Introduction to Liberal Hegemony by John Mearsheimer
Speaker: John J. Mearsheimer, Wendell Harrison Distinguished Service Professor of Political Science and Co-Director of the Program on International Security, University of Chicago.
Notable Works:
The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001, 2014) - addressed realism.
The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy (2007) - co-authored with Steve Walt.
Lecture Series:
Part of this year’s Henry L. Stimson Lectures at Macmillan Center for International and Area Studies.
The lecture series funded by an anonymous donor.
Themes of the series: "Liberal Ideals and International Realities".
Today's lecture: "The Roots of Liberal Hegemony".
Upcoming Lectures:
The False Promise of Liberal Hegemony (Wednesday)
The Case for Restraint (Thursday)
Book Genesis and Structure
Motivation for the Book:
Interest in the relationship between liberalism, nationalism, and realism.
Writing Process:
Initial struggle to conceptualize liberalism and organize the book.
Spent 2-3 years researching and defining liberalism.
Focus:
Begins with core ideas of liberalism before exploring international relations (IR).
Outlines three major sections:
Roots of liberalism (Chapters 1-4)
Chapter 1: Introduction
Chapter 2: Human nature
Chapter 3: Political Liberalism
Chapter 4: Cracks in the liberal edifice
Application in foreign policy (Chapter 5)
Human Nature and Liberal Thought
Human Nature Questions:
Are humans social beings or individuals?
Can a universal consensus on the good life be reached?
Mearsheimer’s Views:
Humans are primarily social animals, heavily influenced by their environments.
Difficulty in achieving universal consensus on key values (e.g., religion and moral principles).
Conflict is embedded in the nature of liberalism due to individual disagreements on essential principles.
Liberal Perspective:
Sees individuals as basic units who construct social contracts (Hobbes, Locke).
Ignores the strong tribal and social bonds inherent in human nature.
Core Elements of Liberalism
Key Assumptions:
Focus on inalienable rights (life, liberty, property).
Importance of tolerance as a principle for resolving conflicts in diverse societies.
Necessity of a state as a night watchman to prevent conflict and protect rights.
Universalism of Liberalism:
Claims that all individuals, regardless of nationality, should enjoy the same rights.
Nationalism vs. Liberalism:
Nationalism is viewed as a powerful political ideology that contradicts the universalist principles of liberalism.
Universities tend to adopt an internationalist perspective, often looking down on nationalism.
Distinction in Types of Liberalism
Two Types:
Classical/Modus Vivendi Liberalism:
Focus on negative rights and minimal state intervention.
Influence of figures like Friedrich Hayek.
Modern/Progressive Liberalism:
Emphasis on positive rights and the need for social engineering by the state.
Associated with thinkers like John Rawls.
Shift Towards Progressive Liberalism:
Progressive liberalism has increasingly dominated the discourse in U.S. politics.
Both major political parties (Democrats and Republicans) engage in social engineering yet advocate for different approaches.
Conclusion and Implications
Failure of Liberal Hegemony:
Mearsheimer argues that liberal hegemony fails due to the challenges posed by nationalism and realism.
The trend of liberal diplomacy leads to conflicts rather than stability.
Seeking Practical Solutions:
Need to assess alternative foreign policies, especially in light of the failures of liberal hegemony.
Upcoming Discussion Points:
Next lecture will delve deeper into the failures of liberal hegemony with specific examples (e.g., NATO expansion, Iraq War).