The opening chapter titled "The Iron Dice" sets the tone for the discussion on the inevitability of war, specifically World War I.
Quote from Theobold von Bethmann-Hollweg, German Chancellor: "If the iron dice must roll, may God help us."
The chapter posits that the belief in war's inevitability is misguided; it was human decisions, often based in fear and self-delusion, that led to catastrophic outcomes.
The misjudgment of timelines before the war: leaders like Kaiser Wilhelm had faith that conflicts would be resolved quickly (e.g., "You will be home before the leaves have fallen from the trees").
The quote from D.H. Lawrence reflects post-war disillusionment, suggesting that wartime optimism was misplaced.
Reacted strongly to the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, expressing personal grief and a desire for revenge against Serbia.
Observed that the assassination was a threat to the monarchial principle in Europe; life for him was emotionally tied to the monarchy’s prestige.
Offered Austria-Hungary unconditional support (a "blank check") to take action against Serbia.
Misjudged the consequences of his pledge, believing it would unify powers under monarchs against the perceived threat.
Emperor Francis Joseph: There was conflicting impulses due to his personal exhaustion and desire for peace.
Count Leopold von Berchtold: Described as incompetent but grew ambitious following German support, using the assassination as pretext to act against Serbia.
Conrad von Hötzendorff: Militarist chief of staff motivated by national pride and prestige, believing a decisive action was needed against Serbia to uphold Austria-Hungary's status.
The content reviews how decisions escalated quickly after the assassination: Germany supported Austria-Hungary while trying to mediate quickly to prevent Russia's involvement.
The ultimatum issued by Austria to Serbia was seen as oppressive and designed to elicit a rejection.
Serbia's response was conciliatory, but the ultimatum's harshness was premeditated to provoke a conflict.
Austria's declaration of war on Serbia triggered a series of mobilizations.
Kaiser Wilhelm’s efforts to remove Russia from the equation failed; he became increasingly paranoid and his diplomatic efforts weakened.
The escalation led to the broadest conflict as states scrambled to adhere to their military timetables.
The chapter argues all leaders misjudged their power, resulting in overconfidence and lack of flexibility in their plans.
The reliance on military timetables and rigid structures hindered potential diplomatic solutions.
Anxiety-led unreconsidered agreements also pushed leaders towards unavoidable conflicts.
The urgent pressure from military leaders emphasized preventive actions to strike first, regardless of the political landscape.
Rigidity brought about by military planning: preparations were not adaptable, which meant any plans set in motion could not be halted or divested.
A lack of empathy characterized the interactions between leaders as every nation failed to consider the perspective of others involved in the conflict.
Each saw themselves as virtuous while viewing opponents as diabolical, leading to a cycle of hostility.
The chapter concludes with a reflection on how the leaders’ flawed character traits (arrogance, ignorance, fear) contributed to the onset of the war.
It stresses that these consequences were products of personal failings rather than destiny or fate.