Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses
Academically Adrift
Limited Learning on College Campuses
Authors
Richard Arum and Josipa Roksa
The University of Chicago Press
Chapter Four
Overview
Focus on academic preparation and what happens post-enrollment in higher education.
Analysis targets multiple actors affecting limited learning on college campuses.
Faculty Role in Learning Limitations
Faculty members tend to prioritize research over teaching in some institutions.
Critique of higher-education institutions for inadequate focus on educating future generations.
Emphasis on faculty practices and responsibilities in the learning process.
Student Engagement in Learning
Many students spend more time socializing than studying.
Limited study time correlates with minimal learning outcomes.
Cultural norms promote social experiences as a core part of college, at times overshadowing academic pursuits.
The collegiate culture encourages a focus on fun and various activities over academic responsibilities.
Perspectives on Current Education Quality
Comparison of quality evaluation for research versus teaching.
Research evaluated in terms of quality relative to genre (Michelin-style).
Teaching evaluated based on safety or minimal standards (Board of Health analogy).
Research findings indicate significant portions of students (45%) show no improvement in critical skills during their first two years of college.
Students labeled as academically adrift might graduate without developing important cognitive skills.
Remarks on College Experience
College perceived more as a social experience than an academic one.
Increasing enrollment costs and minimal learning gains raise concerns about education value.
Chapter Five
Higher Education's Contributed Societal Roles
Colleges and universities contribute in various fields like pharmaceuticals and sports, yet often neglect undergraduate learning.
Faculty and administrators prioritize competing demands over teaching improvements.
Inequalities in Learning Outcomes
Observed disparities in learning based on socioeconomic, racial, and ethnic backgrounds.
Majority of students report spending less time on academic pursuits versus non-academic activities.
Certain institutions with rigorous academic practices yield better learning outcomes and experiences.
Historical Context of Limited Learning
Historical references to previous limited learning observations from the late 18th and early 19th centuries.
Modern implication of academic skills and credentials for occupational success emphasizes new demands on education.
Global Context
The U.S. once led in higher education participation but has since fallen behind other countries in college graduation rates.
Shift towards a more focused demand for academic skills globally impacting U.S. competitiveness.
Caution against complacency in assessing U.S. higher education's status and effectiveness.
Development of Recommendations
Importance of Student Preparation
Prior academic performance correlates with better learning outcomes in college.
One-third of four-year college students require remediation, hindering higher-order skills development.
Social norms and moral education need emphasis, not just standardized testing.
Leadership in Higher Education
Creating a culture of learning necessitates strong leadership and institutional commitment.
Faculty should prioritize teaching and student learning in alignment with institutional goals.
Reflection on prior roles and responsibility for student development is essential.
Curriculum and Instructional Improvements
Need for enhanced academic rigor in undergraduate coursework.
High expectations and rigorous assignments correlate with improved student performance.
Importance of active learning rooted in scholarship emphasizing student engagement and practical applications.
Recognizing and Addressing Social Integration
The emphasis on social experiences does not equate to increased learning efficiency.
Distinction between persistence in academics (retention) and actual learning outcomes should be noted and adjusted.
Accountabilities and Institutional Challenges
Calls for institutional accountability systems present various challenges and resistances from within colleges.
Importance of developing effective measures for student learning outcomes is highlighted.
Potential for Change
Growth in institutional self-assessment efforts can guide improved student education.
Recognizing that rigorous experiences can foster both individual and institutional educational growth.
Conclusion
Current state of limited learning in higher education is alarming but not deemed a crisis.
The need for educational change framed as a moral imperative to rediscover and prioritize the purpose of education.
Call for collective action amongst stakeholders to impact change in educational culture for the common good of future generations.