Purposiveness: Research needs a clear purpose or aim.
Rigor: Careful consideration to minimize errors, requiring a solid theoretical base and methodological design.
Testability: Research should allow for logical hypothesis testing.
Replicability: Results should lead to similar conclusions when tests are repeated in similar circumstances.
Precision and Confidence:
Precision: How closely the sample statistic matches the parameter.
Confidence: The probability that estimations are accurate.
Objectivity: Conclusions must stem from actual data findings.
Generalizability: Wider applicability of results enhances validity.
Parsimony: Favor efficient models; prefer fewer variables unless additional insight is gained.
Identify Broad Area of Interest: Initial focus.
Dissect into Sub-Areas: Narrow down potential research topics.
Select a Sub-Area: Often through elimination.
Raise Research Questions: Determine specific queries to explore.
Formulate Objectives: Define what the research aims to achieve.
Assess Feasibility: Consider cost and time constraints.
Ensure Interest: Verify personal motivation for the study.
Establish overarching theme: Health.
Health services provided to the community.
Effectiveness of those services.
Cost of services.
Health insurance schemes available.
Training of health professionals.
Ethics and adherence in health practices.
Consumer attitudes towards health services.
Community responsiveness in service delivery.
Selected theme: Community Responsiveness in Health Services.
Definitions of community responsiveness by stakeholders.
Strategies to achieve responsiveness.
Indicators for evaluating effectiveness.
Main Objective: Evaluate effectiveness of community-responsive strategies in health service delivery.
Understand "Community Responsiveness" concept.
Identify strategies for implementation.
Develop evaluation indicators for effectiveness.
Time availability.
Financial resource requirements.
Personal technical expertise in the area.
Confirm agreement with objectives and adequacy of resources.
Ensure feasibility of data collection before finalizing a research topic.
Confusion can often precede clarity; embrace it.
Involves secondary data analysis and primary data (qualitative).
Review criteria: methodology, error, accuracy, currency, and objective dependability of sources.
Focus Groups: Gathering insights from a small group (8-10 persons).
Individual Depth Interviews: Conversational methods rather than structured.
Projective Techniques: Role play, thematic appreciation tests, cartoon tests.
Case Studies: Contextual analysis of specific events or conditions.
Participant Observation: Engaging with subjects to understand their experiences.
Films/Videotapes: Documenting group dynamics in research.
Results lead to clear problem definitions, such as:
Organizational structure vs. decision-making effectiveness.
Cultural influences on hierarchical relationships.
Effectiveness of downsizing as a turnaround strategy.
Aims to create profiles or describe phenomena, commonly utilizing surveys and observational techniques.
Focuses on relationships between dependent and independent variables, necessitating variable manipulation.
Involves analysis of variables where manipulation is not possible (post-event analysis).
Example: Investigating gender and creativity in children, or the effects of prior training on performance.
Investigates past events and their implications, requiring careful data collection and validity checking.
Ensure full disclosure of research purpose, respect privacy, and maintain participant confidentiality.
Avoid data alterations, biased interpretations, and omitting uncomfortable findings.
Reject deliberate errors or misuse of statistics, and ensure objective recommendations.
Protect participant rights, avoid deception, and ensure freedom to withdraw.
Various categories of errors including measurement, population definition, sampling, data analysis, and respondent-related errors.
Understanding total error: The discrepancy between true population values vs. observed data.
Random Sampling Error: Variation due to differences in sampling.
Non-Sampling Errors: Result from issues in definitions, methods, or analysis; include both non-response and response errors.