Clinical Leadership MRTY3122 - Practice Flashcards
What is Clinical Leadership
Clinical leadership is about advocating for patients, delivering high‑quality patient care, and motivating teams to achieve patient‑centred outcomes.
It also involves instigating and facilitating change when current systems aren’t working.
Important distinction: clinical leadership is not management (see contrasts below).
Clinical Leadership at a glance
Core focus: delivering safe, effective care; speaking up for safety; empowering colleagues; aligning goals and sharing a vision for excellent care.
Leadership vs management:
Leadership focuses on patient care and team empowerment.
Management covers recruitment, rostering, financial performance, capital projects, administration, accreditation, and performance management.
Both are needed, but clinical leadership emphasizes advocacy, safety, and system improvement.
Emotional wellbeing and safety context
Topics may be emotionally triggering: adverse events with case images; motorcycle trauma; clinical deterioration; workplace issues.
The University offers wellbeing and counselling services; access is free for students.
Emphasis on creating a supportive learning environment.
Values and traits in clinical leadership
Traits deemed most important (collective view):
Being relational and flexible; caring/compassionate; visible in practice; effective communicator; courageous; able to manage resources; inspires confidence; articulate; adaptable to change; approachable. (Examples of perceived importance: 90%, 89% levels across several traits.)
Traits deemed least important in some assessments: artistic/imaginative; aligning people; being a teacher; taking calculated risks; mentoring; negotiating; creative/imaginative; consistency; management experience; being a coach.
Key takeaway: people‑facing, relational, and adaptive capabilities are prioritized over purely administrative traits.
Emotional intelligence (EI)
EI definition: the ability to perceive and express emotion, assimilate emotion in thought, understand and reason with emotion, and regulate emotion in self and others.
High EI is highly desirable for managers and leaders and particularly valued in clinical leaders.
Pillars of Clinical Leadership
Communication
Innovation
Patient safety
Courage
Clinical knowledge and experience
Humility
Psychological safety
A psychologically safe workplace enables clinical leadership by encouraging staff to speak up and challenge the status quo.
Four domains of psychological safety:
Learner safety
Collaborator safety
Inclusion safety
Challenger safety
Barriers to clinical leadership
Lessons from "Silence That May Kill" (aviation): challenger safety is essential.
Barriers include:
Authority gradient (power gradient) between staff and leaders.
Dysfunctional team dynamics.
Medical dominance and competing stakeholder interests.
Poor organizational culture.
Consequences of poor organizational culture
Internal impacts: organizational failure, reputational damage, loss of trained staff, higher turnover, poor working conditions, increased workload, higher costs, lost time, reduced service capacity.
External impacts: negative health outcomes, poor clinical care, patient harm, delays in care, reduced access to health services, loss of public confidence.
Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Inquiry (2013)
Scale: served ~320{,}000 patients and employed ~3{,}000 staff.
Findings: between 2005–2008, between 400 and 1{,}200 patients died due to substandard care.
Critical organizational cultural issues identified:
Lack of openness to criticism
Lack of patient-centered thinking
Secrecy and concealment of problems
Acceptance of poor standards
Failure to place the patient first in all actions
Practical implications for radiography and clinical practice
ALARA principle: keep exposures As Low As Reasonably Achievable.
Imaging request screening: assess whether the examination is appropriate.
Resource allocation and radiation safety considerations.
Contrast safety and overall patient safety.
Team‑based responsibility for safety and dose management.
Clinical leadership in radiography and multi‑disciplinary teams
Patient safety priorities:
ALARA
Procedural safety and patient care
Radiation safety for team members (PPE, shielding, monitoring)
Image/dose optimisation
Soft patient‑care tasks: patient comfort, room turnover, and non‑technical duties integral to safe care.
Final check with the whole team and patient before a procedure begins (procedural time‑outs):
Correct patient (+ ID)
Correct procedure (+ consent)
Correct operative site
All relevant clinical concerns addressed
Time‑outs are led by the most senior team member and involve every clinical team member; provide a space to clarify concerns before proceeding.
Time‑outs and graded assertiveness
Time‑outs require respectful, professional communication and clear escalation routes.
Graded assertiveness framework includes phrases such as:
What you are doing is not safe, we need to stop and get help.
I am concerned that…
I think we should consider…
Have you considered…
Can you clarify…
Audience awareness: tailor communication to the target audience and escalation path.
Clinical leadership as a student
Leadership expectations for students are not to be an automatic leadership figure; rather, contribute to patient safety by:
Following directions
Alerting supervisors to potential issues
Reflecting on incidents and considering where clinical leadership fits
Dunning‑Kruger effect in clinical leadership development
Conceptual model: Peak of Mount Stupid → Valley of Despair → Plateau of Sustainability → Slope of Enlightenment.
Highlights that knowledge confidence does not always align with actual competence; learning progresses through awareness of limits and growth.
Obstructive behaviours vs leadership
Obstructive behaviours can delay patient care and increase team workload.
Important to distinguish obstructive behaviours from constructive leadership actions.
Obstruction degrades team dynamics and can worsen patient outcomes.
Practical case study ideas (cath lab context)
Case study: applying clinical leadership in the cath lab may involve
Speaking up when protocol deviations are noticed
Leading a debrief after a near‑miss to implement system changes
Facilitating interprofessional communication during high‑pressure cases
Balancing rapid decision‑making with patient advocacy and safety
Notes on context, ethics, and real‑world relevance
Ethical implications: prioritising patient safety, advocating for vulnerable patients, ensuring transparency and accountability, and balancing resource use with patient need.
Philosophical themes: humility, truthfulness, respect for patient autonomy, and the duty to improve systems for broader health outcomes.
Real‑world relevance: historical lessons from major inquiries (e.g., Mid Staffordshire) underscore the consequences of culture and leadership failures on patient outcomes.
Key numerical references and formulas (LaTeX)
Celebrating 175 years of The University of Sydney: 175 years
Mid Staffordshire Inquiry (2013) findings:
Population served: 320{,}000 patients
Staff: 3{,}000 employees
Deaths attributable to substandard care: between 400 and 1{,}200
Time frame of inquiry findings: 2005 ext{ to } 2008
Leadership trait importance (illustrative): percentages reported include values such as 90\%, 89\%, 89\% for several highly valued traits; least important traits include 22\%–21\% in specific categories.
Safety and exposure references (radiology): ALARA principle; imaging request screening; resource allocation; contrast safety; PPE and radiation safety measures.
Summary of connections to foundational principles
Interprofessional collaboration and patient advocacy align with CPD and lifelong learning.
Psychological safety is a prerequisite for effective leadership in high‑reliability environments like radiology and the cath lab.
Transformational leadership principles support change management, alignment of team goals, and utilization of diverse skills to improve service delivery.
The Dunning‑Kruger framework reminds students that developing leadership competence requires humility, reflective practice, and ongoing learning.
Implications for exam preparation
Be able to distinguish between clinical leadership and management functions.
Understand theoretical models (Great Man, Contingency, Transformational) and their applicability to healthcare settings.
Recall key pillars and values of clinical leadership, and explain how psychological safety enables leadership in practice.
Identify barriers to leadership and consequences of poor culture, with real‑world examples from major inquiries.
Apply the time‑out and graded assertiveness concepts to hypothetical scenarios in radiology or cath lab contexts.
Demonstrate awareness of ethical and professional responsibilities, including patient safety, advocacy, and continuous professional development.
References to course context
Case study focus: Clinical Leadership in the cath lab (practical application)
Content warnings: wellbeing, adverse events, clinical deterioration, workplace issues; resources available through university supports.
CPD and lifelong learning emphasis as part of LO2 and LO5 outcomes.