1.1. Introductory Notes on the Origins and Meaning of the Term Economy.
1.2. From the Company as an Institution and as a System to the Science of Business Administration.
1.3. The Different Meaning of the Term Business in Legal Disciplines.
The term "economy" was first used in the 5th century BC by Xenophon in a book named "Economico".
In Greek, "economy" comes from the fusion of "oikos" (house) and "nomos" (law, regulation, governance).
Initially, the concept referred to household management rather than political economy.
In Xenophon’s time, household management involved various entrepreneurial activities, including farming and crafting for personal use.
Family management was more complex as there were no significant separations of tasks and labor as seen today.
Xenophon not only defines "economy" but also outlines essential principles for governing a household, many of which remain relevant today.
There were larger entrepreneurial families engaged in productive and commercial activities, using slaves for labor.
A dialogue in "Economico" features Socrates advising Critobulus on agricultural entrepreneurship, emphasizing that personal qualities matter more than just financial means.
The essence of an entrepreneur is to recognize potential utility in seemingly useless or dangerous things, transforming them into value.
The civil code defines business as the complex of assets organized by the entrepreneur for business activities.
This highlights a static, asset-based view compared to a dynamic perspective by business economists.
Legal aspects emphasize the need for a representation of businesses that protects obligations to third parties during entrepreneurial activities.
2.1. The Principle of Progress.
2.2. The Principle of Unity and Business Purpose.
2.3. The Principle of Economic Efficiency.
2.4. The Principle of Solvency.
2.5. The Principle of Autonomy.
2.6. The Notion of Efficiency and Effectiveness.
2.7. The Economic-Business Risk: Summary and Referral.
Progress is defined as the capacity to increase available goods to satisfy needs.
Human development and material progress are interconnected and involve philosophical underpinnings.
Aristotle’s concept of "dynamic" features relates to the transformation potential of every creature, which influences the understanding of economic progress.
All resources and operations within the business must be interconnected and work towards satisfying human needs.
Companies applying this principle are more competitive and efficient.
Cohesion among objectives and operations prevents confusion and contributes to longevity.
Economic efficiency measures the relationship between resources used and the value generated.
Resources must be effectively managed to exceed costs with generated returns over time, ensuring sustainable practice.
Solvency represents the company's ability to meet obligations without compromising economic health, emphasizing cash flow management.
Autonomy underpins organizational integrity, allowing businesses to thrive without undue influence from external finances.
Efficiency focuses on resource management while effectiveness emphasizes satisfying stakeholders' needs, aligning with corporate objectives.
Understanding the risks associated with economic environments is essential for making informed business decisions, emphasizing preparedness for unexpected occurrences.
3.1. Premise.
3.2. Relationships between the economicity of management and business solvency.
3.3. Inadequacy of the balance sheet to represent prospective relationships between the economic and financial equilibrium of companies.
The operation of a business relies on effective management tools to track results and adapt strategies accordingly.
Economicity reflects the ability to reintegrate investments, while solvency ensures obligations are met without jeopardizing financial stability.
The balance sheet may not accurately represent future economic viability. A deeper analysis of cash flow and trends is necessary for proper financial health assessments.
5.1. The notion of "business success".
5.2. The so-called "entrepreneurial formula" for analyzing success.
5.3. The analysis of success conditions in strategic business areas.
5.4. The evaluation of the entrepreneurial formula from a social perspective.
Business success is expressed through the achievement of objectives aligned with human needs, differentiated by customer expectations and stakeholder contributions.
The business structure incorporates both competitive and social values, aiming for market dominance and a solid organizational climate aiding sustainable success.
Relate competitive success with social expectations to achieve lasting economic results.