Authors: Andrew Brown and Graeme Small
Publisher: Manchester University Press
Focus: Explores the relationship between the court and civic society in the Burgundian territories, particularly from 1420 to 1530.
Context: A grand banquet organized by Duke Philip the Good to signify a commitment to crusading activities.
Huizinga's View: Suggested that the extravagant event was more about chivalric fantasy than serious intent.
Modern Historians' Perspective: They argue for Philip's genuine crusading intentions, evidenced by his actions before and after the Feast.
Symbolic Meaning: The event served political purposes and meant to reinforce Philip's control over the nobility.
Attendees: Exclusively included high nobility from Burgundian territories, emphasizing strict social hierarchies.
Entertainment and Symbolism: Involved jousts and representations that referenced crusading themes and conveyed messages of unity and authority.
The Role of Olivier de la Marche: Provided a firsthand account of the Feast, claiming the role of 'Holy Church' at the event.
Crusading Intent: Most vows taken during the Feast were seen as binding commitments, intended to create a unified front against the Turkish threat.
Criticism of Crusading Motives: Some debates exist regarding whether the vows were genuinely pious or politically motivated.
Creating Community: The Feast aimed to foster a sense of belonging among nobles and demonstrate the strength of Burgundian authority.
Urban Involvement: Although the event was exclusive, it required the participation of urban artisans, tradespeople, and the crafting of ceremonial elements, linking cities to court spectacles.
Political and Social Goals: The Feast not only celebrated victories but also sought to reinforce the duke's authority and quell recent rebellions.
Activities: Contests of jousters, archers, and poets were a defining feature of urban life in the Low Countries during the fifteenth century.
Origins of Shooting Guilds: Traced back to military roles from late thirteenth to early fourteenth centuries; these guilds fostered social connections beyond their military purpose.
Community Engagement: Jousts were opportunities for civic pride and social standing among townsfolk and nobility alike, often organized and subsidized by towns.
Civic Participation: Town economies benefited from these events through the engagement of local artisans and trade.
Connection to Rulership: Dukes like Philip the Good actively participated in these civic events to strengthen social ties and exert authority within their domains.
Emergence and Functions: Rhetoric chambers flourished by the third decade of the fifteenth century and included performance arts and literary competitions.
Civic and Religious Dimensions: While participating in grand civic spectacles, they maintained ties to religious themes to reflect community values.
Social Standing: Members of shooting guilds often came from well-off backgrounds, with roles reflecting urban hierarchies.
Political Unrest: By the end of the fifteenth century, the costs and societal demands associated with jousting led to reduced participation, paralleling a broader shift in civic organization regarding public morality and behavior.
Rhetoric vs. Political Goals: As civic autonomy declined, rhetoric and festive events took on a more pronounced role in political discourse, occasionally posing threats to the state.
Conclusion: The evolution in the nature of urban civic engagement reflects broader societal changes within the Burgundian Low Countries, showcasing the intertwined roles of courtly authority and civic identity.