Biol 114 Fall 2023
Week 1: 8/22
Unifying themes of Biology and the Biological Hierarchy,
Science is the process of identifying patterns and asking questions that help us to best understand those patterns. More specifically, science is the process of disproving hypotheses (specific, testable, rejectable statements) in an effort to focus in on the true answer to a question. When several related phenomena are identified a much larger concept is described to explain them. This umbrella-like concept is what we call a theory. NOTE: in non-scientific terms, a theory is a statement that attempts to explain an event, and does not have much, or any, evidence to support it yet (sort of like a hypothesis). In science, a theory has a tremendous amount of evidence supporting the concept and patterns it describes. Theories are a way of bringing together multiple related, demonstrated hypotheses. Since scientific advancement is based on the assumptions of previous scientific discoveries, wide realms of scientific thought may be discarded by disproving a single hypothesis that supported one of the initial scientific assumptions.
No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.
– Albert Einstein
Such is the risk of scientific endeavors. However, because of this process, any hypothesis that has stood the test of time is likely one we can trust.
Theories (and most scientific concepts) generally consist of 2 parts: Pattern and Process. Pattern refers to the general observations of repetition one sees within a system (This is akin to the observation phase of the scientific method). Process, on the other hand, is the mechanism, or way in which the pattern occurs. Frequently, there may be several processes involved in an identified pattern. This may depend on how specifically the pattern is considered. Additionally, processes may be divided into proximate vs. ultimate processes or reasons. Proximate refers to that which occurs in the short-term (usually measured in fractions of lifetimes), where ultimate refers to a longer timeframe (e.g., most of a lifetime or more).
Example:
While walking through the woods, you notice that under- and mid-story trees (those with leaves below the uppermost canopy), tend to have larger leaves than upper-story trees do. You also notice that this sometimes occurs within a single tree. That is, lower leaves tend to be larger than leaves higher up. This is your pattern. What is the process? This question can be answered at many levels. You can think about it in terms of the physiology of the plant: what is the physiological mechanism involved in creating larger vs. smaller leaves (proximate)? Or you can ask it in a more ecological way: what environmental conditions exist that cause the tree to perform this pattern (proximate or ultimate, depending on timescale involved)? Also, underlying the whole system is an evolutionary question: what selective forces have caused this pattern and does this pattern increase the fitness (see below for definition) of the tree (ultimate)?
There are two unifying (or underlying) themes in biology:
One conclusion that can be drawn from Cell Theory, is that if you trace a cell’s lineage back far enough, you will conclude that all cells are descended from a common ancestral cell. Prior to the original description of Cell Theory, it was assumed that cells spontaneously generated. That is, cells come to being from certain conditions on their own.
Individuals live, give birth, and die, but their evolutionary success can only be seen over a time longer than their lifespan and by comparing their success with that of other members of the population. Living a year and giving birth to three offspring is relatively successful if the average life span is 10 months with two offspring but relatively unsuccessful if the average is two years with six offspring. In the first case, the individual is favored by evolution, but the same individual is not favored in the second scenario. Evolution is a property of populations.
There are two general ideas within evolutionary theory:
The biological hierarchy is a framework of organization regarding all life around us. It provides us with a simple way of guaranteeing we are talking about the same terms as we consider life across varying scales. This hierarchy may seem simplistic and out of place in a college Biology course. However, it has been my experience that when talking to students about biological concepts, the students frequently jump between levels of the hierarchy without meaning to and, as a result, speak incorrectly about their topic. For example, I frequently hear students referring to the “evolution of an individual”, when this is incorrect. Evolution is a process that happens at the population level, not at the individual or organismal level.
The Biological Hierarchy levels consist of: atoms, molecules, organelles, cells, tissues, organs and organ systems, organisms, populations, communities, ecosystems, and the biosphere. We will not be covering much information on the atoms, molecules, organelles, cells, tissues, and organ systems. These are more the realm of Biol 113. We will, however, cover the remaining levels throughout the course (with occasional dips into the former levels).
Notes About the hierarchy:
To understand this, you have to have a clear idea of what the hierarchy is. The hierarchy is a means of grouping units of something (individual animals, say) into nested levels of groups. Thus, in an organism, atoms are grouped into kinds of molecules, which are grouped into different kinds of organelles, which are grouped into different kinds of cells, which are grouped into different kinds of tissues, etc. This grouping is not just for convenience but is a real grouping (i.e. it exists in nature). The biological hierarchy is real also, and we study it as such because some phenomena are only observable by studying a whole level of organization in the hierarchy. The set of phenomena that can be explained only by looking at an entire hierarchical level are the emergent properties of that level. We study populations, because one may not be able to understand why a species is rare just by looking at how many offspring an organisms can produce. The same reasoning leads us to consider community ecology as a separate subdiscipline, as it may be impossible to understand the change in one population without understanding its interactions with other species.
So, we have a hierarchy of biological subdisciplines because nature is hierarchical and there are phenomena that are understood only when one studies the appropriate level within the hierarchy.
Finally, having argued for separate subdisciplines, I want to caution you about considering them as independent of one another. All belong to the same hierarchy. As a result, changes in one of the levels, frequently brings about a change in the other levels as well.