Freud – Drive/Instinct Psychology (1st Wave)
Psyche governed by unconscious sexual & aggressive drives.
Psychosexual stages: oral → anal → phallic → genital.
Oedipus complex indispensable for healthy development.
Environment mattered (often mis-understood as ignored by Freud).
Anna Freud & Classic “Ego Psychology” (2nd Wave)
Continued father’s work but centred on the ego and its defensive operations.
Expanded the list of defence mechanisms beyond repression.
Focus on how ego adapts to reality (Hartmann, Rapaport, Kernberg, etc.).
British “Object-Relations” & Early Self-Psychology (3rd Wave)
Melanie Klein: infant relates to objects that are largely projections of its internal world (introjected & projected mother).
Ronald Fairbairn: real external objects/people can be pathogenic when they fail to satisfy needs.
Bion: importance of containment, reverie, alpha-function.
Shift from drives → relationships with real objects.
Key Conceptual Shifts
From intrapsychic drives → internal objects → actual interpersonal relations.
In part of the ego resides a structured concept of the Self.
Freud (1905)
Unconscious displacement of old feelings/fantasies onto analyst (“new editions of old conflicts”).
Manifestation of the repetition compulsion.
Initially viewed as resistance; later the very vehicle of cure.
Split into:
Positive (warm, hopeful, trusting feelings).
Negative (hostile, angry, hateful feelings).
Klein (1952)
Roots of transference in earliest object-relations (love/hate oscillations).
Full analysis of negative transference necessary to reach deepest layers.
Definition: Therapist’s total internal/external reactions to a client, shaped by the therapist’s own vulnerabilities & conflicts.
Historical views
Freud: obstacle—projection of analyst’s past figures onto patient.
Winnicott: broader, “objective” countertransference—normal, understandable reactions to patient’s actual personality.
Mother–infant analogy: infant must experience and learn to hate; therapist likewise may feel hate and must manage it.
Clinical Management
Personal therapy, supervision, ongoing self-reflection.
When processed, becomes a diagnostic & empathic tool.
Typology
Proactive (Freud’s original sense) – stems from therapist’s own life.
Concordant: patient evokes feelings linked to therapist’s personal past.
Complementary: patient triggers therapist’s archaic object representations (therapist feels burdened, dislike, etc.).
Reactive – response to patient’s communications/behaviour in the room.
Can also be complementary (feeling as the original object felt) or concordant (feeling as the patient felt with that object).
Foundation stone of the therapeutic relationship; may span up to ≈4 sessions.
Core elements:
Referral question & specification of presenting problem.
History and timeline of the problem.
Analysis of maintaining & eliciting variables.
Motivation & insight assessment.
Mental Status Examination (MSE) via open-ended questions, empathic observation, attention to process.
Triangulation for robustness:
Clinical interview.
Objective tests (e.g., MMPI); beware of deliberate distortion.
Projective tests (e.g., Rorschach inkblots).
Formulation
Integrative hypothesis uniting triggers, history, resilience, context.
Tailored to theoretical orientation (e.g., jointly constructed in CBT, deeper transferential layer in psychodynamic work).
Mind largely unconscious.
Psychic determinism: every act/thought multiply determined by unconscious meaning.
Core motivators: sexuality & aggression, later amended by object-relations needs.
Structural model:
Id: instinctual reservoir, pleasure principle.
Ego: mediator, reality testing, defences (mostly unconscious).
Superego: internalised parental standards, moral conscience.
Drive Theory: conflict between instinctual drives (id) & external reality (ego).
Neurosis: product of repression; all humans neurotic to degree, but defended.
Aggression conceptualised eventually as defensive—death instinct idea largely abandoned by modern Freudians.
Successful navigation of psychosexual stages.
Resolution of Oedipus complex ⇒ capacity for mature love & sexuality.
Early interplay of constitution + adverse environment/trauma.
Loss (object death, rejection) → anxiety → defensive patterns.
Transition toward two-person psychology: drives & object relations equally influential.
Intrapersonal: Resistances (repression, secondary gain, transference, repetition-compulsion, superego resistance).
Interpersonal: Internalised sadomasochistic templates → seeking abusive relationships that reaffirm pathology.
Crisis occurs when defences fail; therapy sought.
Linear deterministic model cannot fully explain spontaneous recovery; contemporary analysts incorporate relational & resilience factors.
Best candidates: neurotic disorders (anxiety, depression), mild–moderate personality issues—especially interpersonal.
Pre-requisites:
Adequate ego strength to face emergent anxiety.
Insight, curiosity, acceptance of need for help.
Capacity for reflection & psychological thinking.
Caution: active suicidality, substance abuse, severe psychosis—risk of symptom exacerbation.
Effective therapist qualities:
Genuine curiosity about human motives.
Empathy; ability to take the patient’s perspective.
Tolerance of uncertainty & intense affect without acting out.
Flexibility, openness, stamina for slow change.
Classical Style
Abstinence: avoid gratifying demands; prevent substitute satisfaction.
Anonymity & neutrality: limit self-disclosure, refrain from advice, teacher, judge roles.
Maintain space for transference to unfold.
Dual stance: empathic elicitation vs. objective data collection.
Evaluate rapport potential, affect tolerance during interview.
Formulation triad:
Presenting problems.
Childhood conflicts/deficits.
Transferential data from interview.
Collaborative discussion of practicalities: setting, frequency, fees, breaks, time-limit.
Informed implicit consent; contrast with explicit CBT contracts.
Holding Environment: protected psychic space for unconscious material (dreams, fantasies, wishes) to surface.
Setting
Classical: patient on couch, analyst out of view.
Once-weekly models: face-to-face.
Free Association: patient articulates thoughts uncensored—the “fundamental rule.”
Intervention Spectrum
Starts supportive → moves to interpretive as ego strengthens.
Work “from surface to depth”: analyse resistances/defences before core fantasies.
Dream Analysis
Dreams = “royal road” to the unconscious.
Distinction: manifest vs. latent content; therapist solicits personal associations to symbols.
Interpretation Types
Genetic/Reconstructive: links present to developmental origins.
Transference (Here-and-Now): highlights re-enactment of past conflicts within patient-therapist relationship.
Working-Through
Time lag between intellectual insight & emotional conviction—repetition across sessions integrates change.