Course Title: PSYC203
Focus: Coursework preparation – Part 2
Instructor: Dr. Chris Walton
Institution: Lancaster University
Weeks 15 & 16:
Activities: Search, prioritize, and read materials; make notes.
Weeks 17 & 18:
Activities: Plan, structure, and write first draft of essay.
Week 19:
Activities: Review draft; proofread, read aloud, edit, revise.
Final Submission Deadline: 12 noon on Friday 14th March 2025.
Focus: Critically assess the relevance of social psychology to events relating to the Black Lives Matter movement.
Intergroup Relations
Collective Behaviour
Word Limit: 2000 words
Assessment Weighting: CWA (50%) and exam (50%)
CWA Deadline: 12 noon on Friday 17th March 2025.
Review notes to identify:
Organizing themes
Patterns of findings
Contrasting theoretical explanations
Methodological differences
e.g. samples (uni students or naturally occurring)
Balance of evidence
do not just outline negatives or studies
Determine your argument:
Structuring approach
Evidence required to support the argument
Title Tips:
Should not repeat the coursework question.
Be specific to the topic and approach.
Example Title: "A critical evaluation of the relevance of Social Identity Theory-based approaches to the policing of crowds."
Identify the specific area of the Black Lives Matter events that you will focus on
Identify the social psychological perspective/approach for examination.
Main body of essay
Describe approach and define core concepts
Describe state of evidence in relation to this approach; break down by core concepts e.g., if you were looking at SIMCA you might need to deal separately with the evidence for the effects of group identification, beliefs about group efficacy, perceived/felt group injustice. –
Critical assessment (establishing relevance to BLM) • Internal and external validity – are there any paradigmatic/methodological issues? •
Any key areas of tension, e.g., in SIT-based approaches, the social category vs its content.
Any issues about balance of evidence, or with replicability etc.?
Look at Meta analysis’s
Generalisability, in theory and in practice (application)?
Summarize key points and take-home messages without repeating prior sentences.
Assert a clear position—avoid neutrality.
Offer recommendations for enhancing social psychology’s relevance to real-world issues.
End with impactful concluding sentences.
**Avoid:
No planning leading to unstructured essays.**
Over-reliance on general knowledge (“common sense”).
Failure to coherently describe relevant studies.
Imbalance in detail regarding methodologies and findings.
Absence of a clear argument and conclusion that merely summarizes.
Conduct thorough research and read widely.
Develop a clear plan for points to make.
Maintain clarity in argument about social psychology’s relevance to specific issues.
Use well-structured paragraphs:
Each paragraph narrates a story (beginning, middle, end).
Organize sources efficiently and integrate across multiple studies.
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough."
Be concise; avoid unnecessary verbosity while adhering to the 2000-word limit.
Ensure clarity and accuracy in terminology.
Integrate information from various sources without disjointed presentation.
Be patient and strategic in writing paragraphs.
Ensure connection between paragraphs to support a cohesive argument.
Review final conclusions against essay body for addressal.
Proofread thoroughly and read aloud for clarity.
Answering incorrect questions or misinterpreting prompts.
Lack of engagement with social psychology literature, falling back on common sense.
Poorly structured arguments leading to disconnection.
Superficial relevance claims without substantial evidence.
Neglecting detailed evaluations of evidence against theoretical frameworks.
Insufficient integration across sources; merely listing findings.
Selection of outdated or inappropriate sources.
Unsubstantiated claims without evidence.
Insufficient depth in discussing key findings.
Absence of a critical perspective in analysis.
Insufficient critical engagement with debatable psychological processes such as deindividuation.
Ignoring more recent theoretical developments like the SIDE model.
Confusion between related concepts like deindividuation and dehumanization.
Overgeneralizing based on limited research findings.
Inadequate critical analysis of sample limitations.
Poor adherence to submission guidelines, including proofreading inadequacies.
Failing to maintain APA 7 standards in citations and references.
Poor clarity: Ambiguously linking social comparison processes to prejudices without sufficient evidence.
Lacks distinction between inherent biases and social influences on behavior.
Fonts: 11-point Calibri, Arial; 12-point Times New Roman, Georgia.
Margins: 2.5 cm/1 inch on all sides.
Double-spacing, left-aligned, with first lines indented, no extra space between paragraphs.
Header includes page numbers; the introduction is not a heading.
Excellent understanding of theories and concepts.
Extensive research evidenced.
Clear structure and argument with strong integration of theory and evidence.
Proper APA formatting throughout.
Good understanding; evidence of range of reading; solid structure; mostly clear arguments.
Reasonable understanding but basic/faulty structure and sources.
Sparse or irrelevant content; weak comprehension of key ideas; excessive reliance on common sense or non-researched claims.
Issues with clarity, structure, and adherence to APA guidelines.
Clarity, breadth, depth of understanding, coherence of argument, utilization of evidence, referencing accuracy.
Feedback coversheet (completed)
Title page with title, SRN, and word count
The essay and references
AI transparency sheet if applicable
Final Submission Deadline: Before 12 noon on Friday 14th March 2025 via Moodle.
Post questions on the discussion forum or engage during Q&A sessions until week 18.
Use Slido for anonymous questions during week 15 sessions.