Environmental Policy & Ontario Greenbelt Lecture
Rational-Comprehensive (Idealized) Model of Policy Making
- Four linear, orderly stages frequently cited as the “official” approach to public policy
- Define or identify the problem
- Assess / analyse policy options
- Implement the selected policy
- Evaluate the policy’s performance and outcomes
- Assumptions
- Actors are perfectly rational and pursue the overall public good
- All relevant information is available, reliable, and understood
- Implementation proceeds exactly as designed, and feedback loops trigger timely course-corrections
- Myth vs. reality
- Often referred to as the “rational-comprehensive model” in textbooks, but rarely observed in practice
- Humorous proverb: “There are two things you never want to see made: sausages & public policy”
Environmental Policy Making in Practice
- Typical sequence actually witnessed
- Environmental problem recognised—frequently first documented by science
- Vested interests mobilise and enter public debate
- Scientific findings are repeatedly challenged, frequently as a deliberate delay tactic
- Environmental NGOs push for strict regulation and state oversight
- Industry and incumbent economic actors resist, preferring voluntary or market-based options
- The public may react superficially or become deeply emotional
- Politicians weigh electoral calculations, lobbying pressure, and the “NIMTO” factor (Not In My Term of Office)
- Final compromise reflects relative power, resources, and influence rather than purely technical merit
Chronic Barriers & Challenges
- \textbf{Political\ will\ is\ everything}
- But political will depends on media salience, public opinion, electoral incentives, and lobbying
- Incumbent industries possess capital, jobs, and well-established lobbying channels → structural power
- Environmental issues are broad and diffuse; they matter to everyone in principle, but often rank low on immediate voting priorities
- Controversy & emotion: environmental decisions intersect with values, identities, and livelihoods
- Scientific and socio-ecological uncertainty clashes with the need for clear yes/no regulatory decisions
- Jurisdictional overlaps (federal–provincial, provincial–municipal) complicate authority and accountability
- Every significant policy creates winners and losers; the losers are strongly motivated to defend the status quo
Analytical Lens: 4 I’s → Ideas • Interests • Institutions • Instruments
- Ideas
- Public perceptions & normative frames (e.g., “jobs vs. environment”, “housing affordability”, “wetlands are wastelands or vital ecosystems?”)
- Scientific knowledge about climate, biodiversity, ecosystem services
- Interests
- Concrete stakeholders and their relative power/influence (industries, NGOs, communities, future generations)
- Possibility of “regulatory capture” when governments align too closely with industry
- Institutions
- Formal jurisdictional rules (federal, provincial, municipal authority)
- Governance architectures, treaties, colonial histories
- Instruments
- Command-and-control regulations, taxes, fees
- Subsidies & incentives
- Decision-support tools: Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), modelling, cost–benefit analysis
Case Study — Ontario Greenbelt, Wetlands & Housing
1. Ontario’s Greenbelt & Growth-Plan Context
- The Greenbelt: a provincially designated area protecting farmland, forests, rivers, lakes, and wetlands around the Greater Golden Horseshoe (GGH)
- Historical evolution can be traced via interactive maps and timelines (Greenbelt Foundation)
- Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2006, updated 2017)
- Performance indicator: “Protect, conserve, enhance and wisely use natural resources”
- The GGH is among the fastest-growing regions in North America
- 2006 baseline vs. 2031 projection show municipalities with population increases of >22\%, >27.5\%, >38.5\%, and >44\%
2. Status & Trends in Wetlands
- Cumulative wetland loss in Southern Ontario (1800-2002): 1.4\,\text{million ha} removed
- Township-level percentages: 0!–!25\%, 25.1!–!45\%, 45.1!–!65\%, 65.1!–!85\%, 85.1!–!100\%
- Additional loss 2000-2011 by ecodistrict: 6{,}152\,\text{ha} (percentage classes 0.01!–!0.40\% up to 1.41!–!1.80\%)
- Multiple, interacting stressors
- Invasive species (e.g., \textit{Phragmites})
- Climate change effects on bogs and fens
- Habitat loss via dredging, shoreline alteration, water-level manipulation, urban development
3. Existing Policy Instruments for Wetland Protection
- Ramsar Convention (International, 1971)
- Ontario statutes & programmes
- Planning Act
- Conservation Authorities Act
- Wetland Conservation Strategy 2017!–!2030 (includes mapping and evaluation, “no net loss” goal, restoration targets)
- Additional tools
- Wetland evaluation system; municipal land-use planning; provincial mapping; decision-screening under Environmental Assessment Act
4. Ideas Shaping Wetland Policy
- Widespread undervaluation: wetlands historically viewed as “swamps” hindering development
- Development narratives (housing, agriculture) are bolstered by organised interests which influence public discourse
- Emerging climate narrative: peatlands and other wetlands as critical natural carbon sinks → strengthens conservation rationale
5. The Housing-Affordability Argument
- Ontario Housing Affordability Task Force (2022) claims province needs 1.5!–!1.8\,\text{million} new homes by 2030 to keep housing affordable
- Idea competes with, and sometimes overrides, conservation goals in political messaging
6. Institutional Landscape of Land-Use Planning in Ontario
- Layered, policy-led system
- Provincial statutes: Planning Act, Places to Grow Act 2005, Greenbelt Act 2005, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act 2001, Niagara Escarpment Planning & Development Act
- Provincial policy documents: Provincial Policy Statement (PPS), Growth Plan, Greenbelt Plan, Niagara Escarpment Plan, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan
- Municipal official plans (single-, upper-, lower-tier)
- Control instruments under the Planning Act
- Zoning by-laws (§34), subdivision plans (§§50!–!51), site-plan control (§41), minor variances (§45), holding by-laws (§36), interim control (§38), Minister’s Zoning Orders (§47), temporary-use by-laws (§39), increased-height/density bonusing (§37)
7. Instrument Shift — Bill 23 “More Homes Built Faster Act” (2022)
- Reduces Conservation Authorities’ role in reviewing planning decisions; weakens Ontario Wetland Evaluation System
- Curtails public meetings & appeal rights under the Planning Act
- Fast-tracks development in York and Durham Regions; eliminates upper-tier regional planning
- Removes development charges for affordable-housing projects
8. Political Ideas & Controversies Around the Greenbelt
- Premier Doug Ford’s public statements (2018-2022): openness to “opening up” parts of the Greenbelt, promises to replace any developed land, subsequent retractions
- CBC, GlobalNews, YouTube clips document evolving rhetoric
9. Interests & Lobbying Networks
- Investigations (CBC, The Narwhal, Toronto Star) map land parcels slated for removal from the Greenbelt and link them to developers with political connections
- Notable purchasers post-June 2018: FLATO Developments, TORCA II Inc, Wyview Group-linked companies, New Horizon Development Group, Rice Group, etc.
- Lobbyists with past ties to Progressive Conservative (PC) Party: Kailey Vokes, Imran Amin, Leith Coghlin, Peter Van Loan, Amir Remtulla, etc.
- Government actors: Caroline Mulroney (Minister of Transportation), Steve Clark (Minister of Municipal Affairs & Housing), Doug Ford (Premier)
10. Civil-Society Mobilisation & Political Reversal
- Intensifying media coverage and public outcry framed Greenbelt changes as potential “corruption” rather than mere land-use planning
- September 22-23, 2023: Premier Doug Ford reverses plan to remove lands from the Greenbelt—illustrates how shifting public ideas can outweigh earlier interests and instruments
11. Integrative Summary (Ideas • Interests • Institutions • Instruments)
- Ideas: affordability vs. conservation; corruption framing shifted public tolerance
- Interests: developers wield capital and political access; environmentalists harness public trust and media
- Institutions: multi-layered statutes & plans, but can be amended by majority-government legislation (e.g., Bill 23)
- Instruments: from strict land-use zoning & Conservation Authority permits to expedited Minister’s Zoning Orders; selection of tools signals policy priorities and alters power balances
Key Takeaways for Study & Exams
- Distinguish the rational-comprehensive model from messy political reality; be ready to cite concrete steps & deviations
- Memorise the 4 I’s framework to dissect any environmental policy dispute
- Recognise political will as contingent and constructed: media narratives, lobby power, election cycles matter
- In Ontario, understand how multiple provincial statutes and municipal plans interlock—and how a single new act (Bill 23) can reconfigure the entire system
- Case studies (Greenbelt & wetlands) show how ecological science, economic growth pressures, and political scandals intertwine to shape final policy outcomes