We categorized substituents on an aromatic ring and discussed their values in terms of reactivity and stability.
The need for ranking substituents to understand their effect on the aromatic reaction rate.
Electron Donating Groups (EDG):
Inject electron density into the aromatic ring, making the ring a stronger nucleophile and more reactive.
Electron Withdrawing Groups (EWG):
Extract electron density from the aromatic ring, weakening the nucleophilic strength and reducing the rate of reactions.
Definition of Regioselectivity:
Preference for specific sites of substitution on the aromatic ring upon the addition of an electrophile.
The presence of substituents affects which hydrogens can be replaced by new electrophiles.
Importance of site positions: ortho, meta, and para described in relation to substituents on the aromatic ring:
Ortho Position: Adjacent to the substituent.
Meta Position: Two carbons away.
Para Position: Opposite the substituent.
Illustrative case of an aromatic ring with an alcohol substituent reacting with an electrophile.
Possible sites of reaction are ortho, meta, and para.
Introduced carbocation intermediates and resonance forms depending on the position of the incoming electrophile.
Practice drawing resonance structures based on electrophilic added positions and carbocation stability.
When an electrophile adds at the ortho or para positions:
The carbocation ends up adjacent to the electron donating substituent, yielding a more stable resonance structure.
When an electrophile adds at the meta position:
The relevant resonance forms do not place the positive charge near the electron donating substituent, reducing stability.
Activating Groups (EDG): Preferentially direct electrophile addition to ortho and para positions.
Deactivating Groups (EWG): Direct electrophile addition to meta positions due to unstable resonance at ortho and para sites.
Special Cases:
Alkyl Groups: EDG despite no resonance effect; direct ortho and para.
Halogens: Have lone pairs but are EWGs; they are ortho/para directors due to lone pairs yet destabilize due to inductive withdrawal.
Ranking of substituent ability to activate:
EDGs elevate reactivity and favor ortho/para attachment due to resonance contributing to stability.
EWGs decrease reactivity and favor meta attachment as ortho and para additions are less stable.
Prioritization matters when evaluating competing substituents on the aromatic ring
The substituent higher on the ranking will determine preferred sites for electrophile addition.
Students tasked with determining effects of given groups (alkyls, nitro, sulfonic acid) on reactivity and regioselectivity.
Evaluating possible sites for substitution and assessing sterics to conclude the favored substitutions.
Recap on how substituents influence both reactivity and regioselectivity for electrophilic aromatic substitution, emphasizing the significance of lone pairs and inductive effects in determining the behavior of groups.