Colonial Encounters 1750-1914
Raw materials
Wheat from American Midwest and southern Russia
meat from Argentina
bananas from Central America
rubber from Brazil
cocoa & palm oil from West Africa
British Exports
By 1840, 60% cotton cotton
200 million yards to Europe.
300 million yards to Latin America.
145 million yards to India.
Sending out half of its saving to foreign investments
“Yesterday I attended a meeting of the unemployed in London and having listened to the wild speeches which were nothing more than a scream for bread, I returned home convinced more than ever of the importance of imperialism….In order to save the million inhabitants of the United Kingdom from a murderous civil war, and create new markets for the products of the mines and factories.”
--Quoted in Heinz Gollwitzer, Europe in the Age of Imperialism
Competitiveness/Technology
Unification of Italy and Germany increase competition.
desire to be a “Great Power.”
Steam power allowed more and quicker navigation.
quinine protected against malaria and death rates in the tropics decreased.
Breech-loading rifles and machine guns increased the military gap with non-Europeans.
Changing European Attitudes about Asians and Africans
1500s to 1600s
heathens--not Christians
Chinese highly praised
African nations
1750 to 1900s
still heathens
Chinese--”John Chinaman--weak cunning-- “Yellow Peril”
African tribes
Pacific Oceania--”big children who lived closer to nature
European View of Global Expansion
Christianizing
Good Government
Work discipline and production for the market to “lazy natives.”
clothing the naked
limited education
suppressing native customs
First Wave of European Colonialism |
---|
1500s - 1600s |
In the Western Hemisphere (Americas) |
Spain and Portugal = were major players; NOT ANYMORE DUN DUN DUN |
Devastated native populations |
Europeans chose the path of conquest and outright colonial rule |
Second Wave of European Colonialism |
---|
1750 – 1900 |
In Africa and Asia |
New countries involved = Germany, Italy, Belgium, the U.S., Japan |
No massive devastation done to native peoples except in Australia |
Europeans preferred informal control (cheaper & less likely to cause war) |
Construction of 2nd-wave European empires in Africa and Asia involved military force or the threat of using it
Although they would have preferred non-violent takeovers, Europeans often had to fight in wars of conquest to create their empires
Always won in the end 🡪 superior militaries and weapons
Various Paths to Colonial Status
India and Indonesia = colonial conquest grew out of earlier interactions with European trading companies
India = became controlled by Britain
Indonesia = became controlled by the Dutch
Neither country had a clear-cut plan for conquest
Conquest evolved slowly as local authorities and European traders made and unmade a variety of alliances
Acquisition of India and Indonesia = fairly easy because both were fragmented territories with no political unity
Australia and New Zealand = both taken over by the British
Similar to the earlier colonization of North America
Conquest accompanied by: massive European settlement and diseases that reduced native numbers
Became settler colonies = “neo-European” societies in the Pacific
Africa, mainland Southeast Asia, and the Pacific islands = occurred later = in the 2nd half of the 19th century
More abruptly and deliberately than anywhere else
The “Scramble for Africa”
Until the 1800s = Europeans knew very little about Africa
1840 = David Livingstone went to Africa
Traveled around and explored there for 30 years
He lost contact with the outside world for 6 years in the 1860s
American Journalist Henry Stanley was sent to look for him -- ended up leading several expeditions himself
Journeys of Livingstone and Stanley increased interest in Africa and its many resources
One European country after another began to claim parts of Africa
Able to take African territories easily because they had superior weapons and a lot of money
1885 = the Berlin Conference = Several European nations met in Berlin to decide how to divide up Africa
No African leaders invited
Peaceful negotiations made between the European powers that officially decided “who got what”
By 1914 = Europeans controlled 90% of Africa
European powers often had to use extensive and bloody military action to maintain control within their acquired African territories
Varying Responses to European Encroachment
Some tried to enlist Europeans in their own internal struggles for power or in their external rivalries with neighboring states
Some tried to pit imperial powers against each other
Some wanted to fight back against the Europeans
Some believed resistance was futile and acceptance of the situation was the only option
Some negotiated with Europeans in an effort to keep as much independence and power as possible
Under European Rule: Cooperation
Many groups and individuals willingly cooperated with colonial authorities
Many men found employment, status, and security in the European-led armed forces
Colonial rulers = expensive, in short supply, and could rarely communicate with their subjects
Result = local intermediaries needed
Local intermediaries = typically from elite or governing families
Local intermediaries = could retain their status and gain wealth by exercising authority at the local level
Many found it beneficial to pursue Western education
Western-educated class served the colonial state, European businesses, and Christian missions as teachers, clerks, translators, and lower-level administrators
Some with even more education = became lawyers, doctors, engineers, journalists, etc.
Under European Rule: Rebellion
Periodic rebellions (both big and small) = a constant problem for colonial regimes everywhere
Most famous colonial rebellion = the Indian Rebellion of 1857-1858
Also known as: the Sepoy Rebellion or Sepoy Mutiny
Sepoys = Indian soldiers in the service of European powers
Indian Rebellion of 1857-1858
Triggered by the introduction into the colony’s forces of a new cartridge smeared with animal fat from cows and pigs
Remember: Indian troops = Hindus and Muslims
Hindus = find cows sacred
Muslims = regard pigs as unclean
Both = viewed this military “innovation” as a plot to harm them and convert them to Christianity
Indian troops in Bengal mutinied against their British superiors
Indian Rebellion spread from Bengal to other regions and other social groups
Many social groups within India were upset with British colonial rule
Local rulers = lost power
Landlords = deprived of their estates and/or rent
Peasants = overtaxed and exploited by urban moneylenders and landlords
Weavers = unemployed (displaced by machines)
Religious leaders = opposed to Christian missionary preaching
Crushed in 1858 🡪 but important results followed:
Widening of the racial divide in colonial India between native Indians and their British rulers 🡪 eroded British tolerance for their subjects
British = became more conservative and cautious when it came to trying to change Indian society 🡪 didn’t want another rebellion
British government assumed direct control over India 🡪 ended the British East India Company’s rule there
Colonial Empires with a Difference
Major factor distinguishing the rulers from the ruled = race
Education for colonial subjects = very limited
Limited to practical subjects
Europeans were afraid that education and knowledge would lead to power for colonial subjects
Colonies with large European settler populations = blatant pattern of racial segregation
Example = apartheid
Racial segregation in South Africa
Racial system provided for separate: “homelands,” educational systems, residential areas, public facilities, etc.
European powers were much more involved and “hands on” with their colonial states in the 19th century
Affected the daily lives of people far more than empires had in the past
Centralized tax-collecting agencies
New modes of transportation and communication
Imposed changes in landholding patterns
Integration of colonial economies into global trade network
Public health and sanitation measures
European colonizers felt the need to count, classify, and organize their colonial subjects
Wanted a way to manage the unfamiliar, complex, varied, and changing societies that they now controlled
Made colonial administration easier
Ex: In African colonies, Europeans identified and sometimes even invented distinct tribes 🡪 each with its own territory, language, customs, chief, etc.
Colonial Empires with a Difference
European colonial policies contradicted their own values and practices at home
European Nations | European Colonies |
---|---|
Becoming more democratic | Were mostly dictatorships (used to create order and stability) |
Swept up in nationalism | Total opposite of national independence |
Christian and Enlightenment idea of human equality | Racial divisions, ranked racial classifications, etc. |
Industrialization and modernization | Modernization discouraged because Europeans did not want modernization to cause opposition to colonial rule |
Raw materials
Wheat from American Midwest and southern Russia
meat from Argentina
bananas from Central America
rubber from Brazil
cocoa & palm oil from West Africa
British Exports
By 1840, 60% cotton cotton
200 million yards to Europe.
300 million yards to Latin America.
145 million yards to India.
Sending out half of its saving to foreign investments
“Yesterday I attended a meeting of the unemployed in London and having listened to the wild speeches which were nothing more than a scream for bread, I returned home convinced more than ever of the importance of imperialism….In order to save the million inhabitants of the United Kingdom from a murderous civil war, and create new markets for the products of the mines and factories.”
--Quoted in Heinz Gollwitzer, Europe in the Age of Imperialism
Competitiveness/Technology
Unification of Italy and Germany increase competition.
desire to be a “Great Power.”
Steam power allowed more and quicker navigation.
quinine protected against malaria and death rates in the tropics decreased.
Breech-loading rifles and machine guns increased the military gap with non-Europeans.
Changing European Attitudes about Asians and Africans
1500s to 1600s
heathens--not Christians
Chinese highly praised
African nations
1750 to 1900s
still heathens
Chinese--”John Chinaman--weak cunning-- “Yellow Peril”
African tribes
Pacific Oceania--”big children who lived closer to nature
European View of Global Expansion
Christianizing
Good Government
Work discipline and production for the market to “lazy natives.”
clothing the naked
limited education
suppressing native customs
First Wave of European Colonialism |
---|
1500s - 1600s |
In the Western Hemisphere (Americas) |
Spain and Portugal = were major players; NOT ANYMORE DUN DUN DUN |
Devastated native populations |
Europeans chose the path of conquest and outright colonial rule |
Second Wave of European Colonialism |
---|
1750 – 1900 |
In Africa and Asia |
New countries involved = Germany, Italy, Belgium, the U.S., Japan |
No massive devastation done to native peoples except in Australia |
Europeans preferred informal control (cheaper & less likely to cause war) |
Construction of 2nd-wave European empires in Africa and Asia involved military force or the threat of using it
Although they would have preferred non-violent takeovers, Europeans often had to fight in wars of conquest to create their empires
Always won in the end 🡪 superior militaries and weapons
Various Paths to Colonial Status
India and Indonesia = colonial conquest grew out of earlier interactions with European trading companies
India = became controlled by Britain
Indonesia = became controlled by the Dutch
Neither country had a clear-cut plan for conquest
Conquest evolved slowly as local authorities and European traders made and unmade a variety of alliances
Acquisition of India and Indonesia = fairly easy because both were fragmented territories with no political unity
Australia and New Zealand = both taken over by the British
Similar to the earlier colonization of North America
Conquest accompanied by: massive European settlement and diseases that reduced native numbers
Became settler colonies = “neo-European” societies in the Pacific
Africa, mainland Southeast Asia, and the Pacific islands = occurred later = in the 2nd half of the 19th century
More abruptly and deliberately than anywhere else
The “Scramble for Africa”
Until the 1800s = Europeans knew very little about Africa
1840 = David Livingstone went to Africa
Traveled around and explored there for 30 years
He lost contact with the outside world for 6 years in the 1860s
American Journalist Henry Stanley was sent to look for him -- ended up leading several expeditions himself
Journeys of Livingstone and Stanley increased interest in Africa and its many resources
One European country after another began to claim parts of Africa
Able to take African territories easily because they had superior weapons and a lot of money
1885 = the Berlin Conference = Several European nations met in Berlin to decide how to divide up Africa
No African leaders invited
Peaceful negotiations made between the European powers that officially decided “who got what”
By 1914 = Europeans controlled 90% of Africa
European powers often had to use extensive and bloody military action to maintain control within their acquired African territories
Varying Responses to European Encroachment
Some tried to enlist Europeans in their own internal struggles for power or in their external rivalries with neighboring states
Some tried to pit imperial powers against each other
Some wanted to fight back against the Europeans
Some believed resistance was futile and acceptance of the situation was the only option
Some negotiated with Europeans in an effort to keep as much independence and power as possible
Under European Rule: Cooperation
Many groups and individuals willingly cooperated with colonial authorities
Many men found employment, status, and security in the European-led armed forces
Colonial rulers = expensive, in short supply, and could rarely communicate with their subjects
Result = local intermediaries needed
Local intermediaries = typically from elite or governing families
Local intermediaries = could retain their status and gain wealth by exercising authority at the local level
Many found it beneficial to pursue Western education
Western-educated class served the colonial state, European businesses, and Christian missions as teachers, clerks, translators, and lower-level administrators
Some with even more education = became lawyers, doctors, engineers, journalists, etc.
Under European Rule: Rebellion
Periodic rebellions (both big and small) = a constant problem for colonial regimes everywhere
Most famous colonial rebellion = the Indian Rebellion of 1857-1858
Also known as: the Sepoy Rebellion or Sepoy Mutiny
Sepoys = Indian soldiers in the service of European powers
Indian Rebellion of 1857-1858
Triggered by the introduction into the colony’s forces of a new cartridge smeared with animal fat from cows and pigs
Remember: Indian troops = Hindus and Muslims
Hindus = find cows sacred
Muslims = regard pigs as unclean
Both = viewed this military “innovation” as a plot to harm them and convert them to Christianity
Indian troops in Bengal mutinied against their British superiors
Indian Rebellion spread from Bengal to other regions and other social groups
Many social groups within India were upset with British colonial rule
Local rulers = lost power
Landlords = deprived of their estates and/or rent
Peasants = overtaxed and exploited by urban moneylenders and landlords
Weavers = unemployed (displaced by machines)
Religious leaders = opposed to Christian missionary preaching
Crushed in 1858 🡪 but important results followed:
Widening of the racial divide in colonial India between native Indians and their British rulers 🡪 eroded British tolerance for their subjects
British = became more conservative and cautious when it came to trying to change Indian society 🡪 didn’t want another rebellion
British government assumed direct control over India 🡪 ended the British East India Company’s rule there
Colonial Empires with a Difference
Major factor distinguishing the rulers from the ruled = race
Education for colonial subjects = very limited
Limited to practical subjects
Europeans were afraid that education and knowledge would lead to power for colonial subjects
Colonies with large European settler populations = blatant pattern of racial segregation
Example = apartheid
Racial segregation in South Africa
Racial system provided for separate: “homelands,” educational systems, residential areas, public facilities, etc.
European powers were much more involved and “hands on” with their colonial states in the 19th century
Affected the daily lives of people far more than empires had in the past
Centralized tax-collecting agencies
New modes of transportation and communication
Imposed changes in landholding patterns
Integration of colonial economies into global trade network
Public health and sanitation measures
European colonizers felt the need to count, classify, and organize their colonial subjects
Wanted a way to manage the unfamiliar, complex, varied, and changing societies that they now controlled
Made colonial administration easier
Ex: In African colonies, Europeans identified and sometimes even invented distinct tribes 🡪 each with its own territory, language, customs, chief, etc.
Colonial Empires with a Difference
European colonial policies contradicted their own values and practices at home
European Nations | European Colonies |
---|---|
Becoming more democratic | Were mostly dictatorships (used to create order and stability) |
Swept up in nationalism | Total opposite of national independence |
Christian and Enlightenment idea of human equality | Racial divisions, ranked racial classifications, etc. |
Industrialization and modernization | Modernization discouraged because Europeans did not want modernization to cause opposition to colonial rule |