~Token Economy~
→ Based on operant conditioning
→ When in prison, desirable behaviour may include:
Avoiding confrontation
Following prison rules
Keeping their cell tidy
→ Desirable behaviour is rewarded with a token
→ Each of these behaviours and rewards would be made clear to prisoners before the programme is implemented
→ Disobedience or non-compliance may result in tokens being withheld or removed
→ Tokens are the secondary reinforcers
→ Tokens may be exchanged for a phone call to a loved one, or extra food - all of which would be primary reinforcers
→ Staff must be trained in order to standardise the procedures so that all prison staff are rewarding the same behaviours in the same way
EVALUATION:
Research Support:
→ RESEARCH SUPPORT
One strength of token economies in prisons is that there is research support.
Hobbs & Holt (1976) studied 3 behavioural units where a token economy system was introduced, and a 4th institution for young offenders as a control condition.
The token economy groups showed a significant difference in the amount of positive behaviour.
This shows that token economies have high ecological validity as they truly do work in prison settings.
Conflicting Evidence:
→ TRAINING REQUIRED
One limitation of token economies is that all staff members involved must be trained to a high standard.
Staff must go through extensive training so that the token system can be standardised, in order to not lose the value of the tokens.
For example, untrained staff may reward one persons behaviour with a token, but not another, even if they performed the same behaviour.
This defeats the value of the token, and makes the system unusable.
→ LITTLE REHABILITATIVE VALUE
A further limitation of token economies is that some say it has little rehabilitative value.
Blackburn (1993) states that token economies have ‘little rehabilitative value’. This is due to positive changes being lost quickly when offenders are released.
Progress is unlikely to continue upon release as law-abiding behaviour is not rewarded on the outside. Rewards prisoners receive from breaking the law (such as group status) may be more powerful than abiding by the token economy.
This suggests that once the token economy is discontinued, offenders quickly regress back to their former behaviour.