Understanding: Focus on intentional vs. automatic processes in visual-motor control
Intentional Processes: Volitional, conscious adjustments made during visual-motor tasks
Automatic Processes: Unconscious, rapid corrections occurring without awareness
Study and Distinction: Differences are primarily studied through experimental paradigms
Double-Step Paradigm: Experimental setup to understand how visual changes affect reaching
Saccadic Suppression: Reduced awareness of changes during rapid eye movements
Correction Mechanisms: Involves racing between automatic and volitional control strategies
The PPC updates and corrects reaching movements online based on visual input
Evidence suggests it processes both visual and proprioceptive information
Eye-Hand Coordination: Describe characteristics during reaching movements
Double-Step Paradigm: Explain the dissociation between perception and action
Volitional vs. Automatic Control: Discuss empirical distinctions and evidence
PPC Involvement: Explain its role in online movement control
Perception-Action Dissociations: Discussive two-visual systems framework
Participants often make rapid, unawareness corrections to hand placement after seeing a shifted target
Main Findings: Movements adjusted even when changes to target location were not perceived
Eye movements typically precede hand movements in peripheral targeting scenarios
Sequence of Movements: Eye -> Head -> Hand
Kinematics of reaching can be altered based on visual feedback
Stable vs. Dynamic Targeting: Differences in hand movement correction
Stationary Targets: Consistent aiming with foveated and peripheral vision
Displaced Targets: Ability to adjust trajectories post-target shift
Understanding reduced visual sensitivity during eye saccades
Affects awareness of target changes occurring within that period
Key Differences:
Fast, automatic corrections vs. slower, voluntary adjustments
Importance of understanding underlying processes for rehabilitation and motor control theories
The PPC's involvement in monitoring and correcting movements dynamically
Evidence through TMS indicating its critical role during on-line adjustments
Distinctions in performance between patients with PPC lesions vs. healthy subjects in grasping tasks
Visuo-Motor Processes: Timing of responses and alterations based on target movements
Studies indicating dual pathways for automatic vs volitional adjustments
Importance of sensory feedback in adjusting movements dynamically
Understanding automatic corrections enhances knowledge of motor control
Practical implications for designing interventions for motor impairments
Ongoing research continues to explore the intricate relationships between perception, intention, and action in motor tasks.