AR

Culture and Psychiatric Diagnosis (DSM 5)

Key Terms and Core Concepts

  • Culture: systems of knowledge, concepts, values, norms, and practices that are learned and transmitted across generations; includes language, religion and spirituality, family structures, life-cycle stages, ceremonial rituals, customs, and broader moral, political, economic, and legal systems. Cultures are open, dynamic systems that change over time; individuals often inhabit multiple cultural contexts that shape identity and experience. Meaning-making derives from developmental and everyday social experiences (including health care) and varies by context. Overgeneralization and fixed cultural traits should be avoided.
  • Race: a social, not biological, construct that divides humanity based on superficial physical traits (e.g., skin color) historically used to justify oppression; varies across history and societies; linked to racism, discrimination, and social oppression; can negatively affect mental health and diagnostic processes.
  • Ethnicity: a culturally constructed group identity defined by shared history, ancestry, geography, language, religion, or other characteristics; may be self-identified or attributed by others; mobility and intermarriage can create mixed or hybrid identities; identification can dilute over time.
  • Intersections with health care: culture, race, and ethnicity relate to social structural inequities (racism, discrimination) that contribute to health disparities; they can also be sources of strength, resilience, and community support; but may cause conflicts in adaptation or during diagnosis requiring culturally informed assessment.
  • DSM-5-TR reference: terms related to race, ethnicity, and cultural factors are discussed in the DSM-5-TR under Cultural and Social Structural Issues, including impact of racism and discrimination on psychiatric diagnosis.

Cultural Formulation: Purpose and Overview

  • Cultural Formulation is a systematic, person-centered framework to assess how culture influences mental health problems within social context and history.
  • It is designed for use by clinicians in any care setting to improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment relevance.
  • Cultural Formulation may be especially helpful for individuals affected by healthcare disparities driven by systemic disadvantage and discrimination.
  • Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI): a practical, interview-based tool that operationalizes the Cultural Formulation components for clinical use.

Cultural Concepts of Distress

  • Definition: ways people express, report, and interpret illness experiences, distress, or suffering; include
    • Cultural idioms of distress: culturally shared ways of talking about distress (e.g., metaphors, phrases, or symptoms expressed in culturally familiar terms) that may not map to a specific psychiatric disorder.
    • Cultural explanations or perceived causes: culturally recognized etiologies or meanings attached to symptoms or distress.
    • Cultural syndromes: clusters of symptoms and attributions that co-occur within specific cultural groups and contexts, recognized locally as coherent patterns.
  • Significance: cultural concepts of distress are often more informative for clinical practice than older culture-bound syndromes; all forms of distress, including DSM disorders, are shaped by culture and may not align neatly with DSM categories.
  • DSM-5-TR alignment: cultural concepts of distress have four key features and influence detection, diagnosis, risk assessment, prognosis, engagement, and treatment planning.

Outline for Cultural Formulation (DSM-5-TR Update)

  • The Outline structures systematic assessment across four major domains and an overall synthesis, focusing on context and illness experience for every individual.
  • Updated from DSM-IV and DSM-5, DSM-5-TR adds an expanded Outline and an assessment approach via the Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI).
  • Categories to assess:
    • Cultural identity of the individual: demographic and culturally defined characteristics (e.g., age, gender, ethnoracial background); consider intersectionality and interaction with clinical setting; include language abilities and preferences; note degree of involvement with cultures of origin vs. new contexts for migrants; consider how identity interaction affects access to care and communication.
    • Cultural concepts of distress: describe constructs that influence experience, understanding, and communication of symptoms; assess severity and meaning in relation to cultural norms; consider help-seeking expectations and patterns of self-coping.
    • Psychosocial stressors and cultural features of vulnerability and resilience: identify stressors and supports in social environment; assess social determinants of mental health (housing, transportation, education, employment); exposure to racism and discrimination; social marginalization; role of religion, family, and social networks; assess functioning, disability, and resilience in cultural context.
    • Cultural features of the relationship between the individual and the clinician, treatment team, and institution: identify cultural distance, language, education, and social status differences that may impede communication or trust; consider effects of racism and discrimination on rapport and symptom elicitation.
    • Overall cultural assessment: summarize implications for differential diagnosis and management; integrate with other clinical information for a comprehensive evaluation.

Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI): What it is and how it is used

  • The CFI is a brief semistructured interview designed to assess cultural factors relevant to care across individuals, in any age group and clinical setting.
  • Core idea: focus on the individual’s experience and social context; use a person-centered approach to avoid stereotyping; responses reflect individual interpretation and help-seeking patterns.
  • Components:
    • Core CFI: 16 questions covering four domains; designed for initial assessment. An Informant version collects collateral information; Supplementary modules expand depth or cover specific populations.
    • Informant Version: collects collateral information from a knowledgeable informant (family, caregiver, etc.).
    • Supplementary Modules: expand on each domain; include modules for children/adolescents, elderly, caregivers, immigrants/refugees, etc.; available online.
  • Format and use: the core CFI is presented in two text columns (left: interviewer instructions and goals; right: example questions). Questions can be rephrased; not exhaustive; follow-up questions may be needed; integrate CFI data with all other clinical materials.
  • Demographics and tailoring: best used with pre-interview demographic information to tailor questions; domains vary by individual and setting.
  • Indications for use: when diagnostic assessment is difficult due to cultural differences; uncertainty about symptom–criterion fit; disagreement about care; mistrust from historical trauma; limited treatment engagement.
  • Interaction with care teams and institutions: includes consideration of provider background, language, and system-level cultural assumptions; aims to improve engagement and rapport.

CFI Core Structure and Domains

  • The core CFI emphasizes four assessment domains:
    • Cultural Definition of the Problem (questions 1–3)
    • Cultural Perceptions of Cause, Context, and Support (questions 4–10)
    • Cultural Factors Affecting Self-Coping and Past Help Seeking (questions 11–13)
    • Cultural Factors Affecting Current Help Seeking (questions 14–16)
  • Purpose: enhance cultural validity of diagnostic assessment, guide treatment planning, and promote patient engagement and satisfaction.
  • Informant version: mirrors core domains to collect collateral data from a social network.
  • Supplementary modules: expand on each domain and cover specific populations; accessible online.

Core Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) — Individual Version (Questions 1–16)

  • Introduction for the individual: state goal to understand problems from the individual’s and social network perspective; emphasize no right or wrong answers.
  • 1. Cultural Definition of the Problem (Explanatory Model, Level of Functioning):
    • Elicit the individual’s view of the core problems and concerns; focus on the individual’s conceptualization of the problem; identify how they frame it for others in their network.
    • 2. How would you describe your problem to family/friends/community?
    • 3. What troubles you most about your problem?
  • 4. Cultural Perceptions of Cause, Context, and Support (Causes):
    • Ask for the individual’s view on causes of the problem.
    • 5. What do others in your family, friends, or community think is causing your problem?
  • 6–7. Stressors and Supports: identify supports that help and stresses that worsen the problem (social, economic, discrimination, etc.).
  • 8–10. Role of Cultural Identity: identify important aspects of cultural background and determine how these aspects influence the problem; examine whether certain identities modulate severity or help-seeking.
  • 11–13. Self-Coping and Past Help Seeking: explore self-coping strategies and past help from various sources; assess usefulness of prior help and barriers to access.
  • 14–16. Current Help-Seeking Preferences: determine what kinds of help would be most useful now; consider input from social network about additional supports; address clinician-patient relationship concerns (perceptions of racism, language barriers, cultural differences).

CFI Informant Version — How it differs

  • The Informant Version collects collateral information from someone close to the patient about the patient’s problems and life circumstances, and can be used when the patient cannot provide information (e.g., children, florid psychosis, cognitive impairment).
  • Structure and questions largely parallel the core CFI, with domain prompts adapted for an informant’s perspective:
    • 1–4: Cultural Definition of the Problem (informant’s view and framing for social network)
    • 5–6: Cultural Perceptions of Cause, Context, and Support
    • 7–8: Stressors and Supports
    • 9–11: Role of Cultural Identity
    • 12–13: Self-Coping and Past Help Seeking
    • 14–16: Current Help-Seeking Preferences
    • 17: Clinician-Patient Relationship concerns
  • The informant version emphasizes the informant’s perspective on the individual’s, family, or community problem and help-seeking dynamics.

Cultural Concepts of Distress: Four Key Points and Clinical Relevance

  • Four key features of cultural concepts of distress in relation to DSM-5-TR nosology:
    • There is seldom a one-to-one correspondence between any cultural concept of distress and a DSM diagnostic entity; mapping is often one-to-many.
    • Symptoms or behaviors that could map onto multiple DSM disorders may be encompassed within a single cultural concept of distress, and conversely, a single DSM disorder might be described by several culturally defined distress concepts.
    • Cultural concepts of distress can apply across a wide range of severity, including presentations not meeting DSM criteria for any disorder (e.g., acute grief, social distress).
    • The same cultural term may denote more than one type of distress concept (e.g., depression may refer to a syndrome, an idiom of distress, or a causal explanation).
  • Practical implications:
    • They facilitate identification of concerns and potential psychopathology in culturally resonant terms; improve screening and rapport; help tailor risk assessment and intervention strategies; guide clinical research and cross-cultural epidemiology; aid in culturally informed differential diagnosis when considering DSM-classified disorders.
  • Clinical use: incorporate cultural concepts of distress into case formulations and DSM-5-TR differential diagnosis when appropriate; they may inform the choice of treatment and engagement strategies; they may also clarify etiological attributions and coping mechanisms within cultural contexts.

Examples of Cultural Concepts of Distress (Selected Illustrative Concepts)

  • Ataque de nervios
    • Latinx contexts; intense emotional upset with crying, shouting, somatic symptoms; often linked to family stressors; overlaps with panic disorder, dissociative disorders, or somatic symptom presentations; in some cases normative distress.
    • Related conditions: in DSM-5-TR, overlaps include panic attack, panic disorder, dissociative disorders, and somatic symptom disorders.
  • Dhat syndrome
    • South Asia; semen loss as causative explanation for anxiety, fatigue, and somatic symptoms; also used as an idiom for non-psychotic distress; prevalence estimates vary by country and setting; related to culture-bound ideas about vital fluids.
    • Related DSM-5-TR conditions: major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, somatic symptom disorders, sexual dysfunctions.
  • Hikikomori
    • Japan; protracted social withdrawal, often with isolation in the home; sometimes ego-syntonic; may be linked to high internet use; duration criteria historically 6+ months (Japan MHLW guideline); can co-occur with DSM-5 disorders or be primary.
    • Related DSM-5-TR conditions: social anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, PTSD, autism spectrum disorder, schizoid and avoidant personality disorders; possible association with internet gaming disorder and school refusal in youth.
  • Khyâl cap (khyal attacks)
    • Cambodians; wind-attacks with panic-like and autonomic symptoms; catastrophic cognitions about wind rising and causing harm; triggers include worry, orthostasis, negative cues, agoraphobic cues; typically aligns with panic attack criteria; may lead to disability;
    • Related DSM-5-TR conditions: panic attack, panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, PTSD, illness anxiety disorder.
  • Kufungisisa
    • Shona (Zimbabwe); idiom of distress meaning “thinking too much”; both explanatory model and psychosocial distress; linked to anxiety, depression, somatic symptoms, ruminative thoughts, interpersonal stress; across cultures linked to various psychopathologies including PTSD and OCD components.
    • Related DSM-5-TR conditions: major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, PTSD, OCD, prolonged grief disorder.
  • Maladi dyab (maladi satan, “sent sickness”)
    • Haitian contexts; illness attributed to envy or malice causing others to harm the individual via sorcery; explains diverse disorders (psychosis, depression, functional impairment) via interpersonal hostility; onset influenced by social status and signs of success; risk of misdiagnosis if taken literally.
    • Related DSM-5-TR conditions: broad range of psychiatric disorders; caution about attributing delusional or persecutory symptoms to supernatural explanations.
  • Nervios
    • Latinx contexts; broad idiom of distress across emotional distress and somatic symptoms; common symptoms include headaches, irritability, sleep disturbance, nervousness, and functional impairment; can resemble anxiety, depression, dissociation, somatic symptom disorders; varies by region (e.g., Puerto Rican variations).
    • Related DSM-5-TR conditions: major depressive disorder, GAD, social anxiety disorder, dissociative and somatic symptom disorders.
  • Shenjing shuairuo (weakness of the nervous system)
    • Mandarin Chinese context; traditional neurasthenia syndrome linking TCM concepts to neurasthenia; symptom clusters include weakness, emotions, excitement, nervous pain, and sleep disturbances; prevalence has declined with ICD-11/ICD-10 transitions; often used to communicate with traditional patients and reduce stigma.
    • Related DSM-5-TR conditions: depressive and anxiety disorders; somatic symptom disorders; brain-related syndromes in other contexts.
  • Susto (fright)
    • Latin America; fright causes soul loss, resulting in unhappiness and illness; symptoms may include sleep disturbance, appetite changes, sadness, low self-worth, social withdrawal; precipitating events vary; some susto cases resemble major depressive disorder or PTSD; others resemble somatic symptom presentations.
    • Related DSM-5-TR conditions: major depressive disorder, PTSD, somatic symptom disorders; related terms espanto in Andean regions; soul-loss concepts present across South Asia and Southeast Asia.
  • Taijin kyofusho (interpersonal fear disorder)
    • Japan; fear/avoidance of social interactions due to concern that appearance or actions are offensive to others; two forms: sensitive type (social anxiety) and offensive type (offending others); includes variants like sekimen-kyofu (facial blushing), jiko-shu-kyofu (olfactory concerns), jiko-kyofu (gaze issues), shubo-kyofu (bodily deformity concerns); broader than DSM-5 social anxiety disorder; overlaps with body dysmorphic and related disorders.
    • Related DSM-5-TR conditions: social anxiety disorder, body dysmorphic disorder, delusional disorder, OCD, olfactory reference syndrome.

Clinical and Practice Implications

  • Diagnostic accuracy: Cultural concepts of distress can aid in recognizing culturally shaped presentations and prevent misdiagnosis (e.g., misinterpreting culturally influenced idioms as psychosis).
  • Therapeutic rapport: Using patients’ own cultural concepts and language improves engagement, adherence, and satisfaction with care.
  • Treatment planning: Understanding cultural explanations and help-seeking patterns informs coping strategies and preferred care modalities (professional vs. traditional or alternative healing avenues).
  • Epidemiology and research: Distinguishing idioms, explanations, and syndromes helps study cultural determinants of risk, course, and outcomes.
  • Nosology and DSM-5-TR integration: DSM-5-TR provides guidance on when cultural concepts of distress align with specified disorders vs. when cases may constitute other specified diagnoses; incorporate cultural terms into case formulations for clarity and context.

Practical Reference Points and Tools

  • DSM-5-TR Context: The cultural formulation framework complements standard diagnostic criteria by introducing culturally grounded dimensions that influence symptom expression, attribution, coping, and care-seeking.
  • Data sources: Use CFI and its informant and supplementary modules to gather culturally informed data; integrate with clinical history, collateral information, and contextual factors.
  • When to employ CFI: especially helpful in cases with significant cultural distance between clinician and patient, uncertain fit with DSM criteria, or divergent views on symptoms and care plans; can address mistrust from traumatic or oppressive histories and improve engagement.
  • CFI availability: core CFI and informant version are available in the DSM-5-TR materials online; supplementary modules exist for specific populations and contexts.
  • Core ideas in practice: The CFI emphasizes a person-centered, flexible interview that yields a comprehensive culturally contextualized clinical picture, guiding diagnosis and treatment in a culturally informed way.

Notes on Integration with DSM-5-TR and Practice

  • There is no one-to-one mapping between cultural concepts of distress and DSM categories; clinicians should use CFI data to inform differential diagnosis while avoiding over- or under-pathologizing culturally bound expressions of distress.
  • Cultural factors can influence risk, resilience, and outcomes; clinicians should assess the role of culture in coping strategies, social supports, and barriers to care.
  • Context matters: language, migration status, discrimination experiences, religious and spiritual beliefs, and social identity all shape the diagnostic and treatment landscape.
  • Ethical and practical implications: maintain cultural humility, avoid stereotyping, recognize systemic biases that affect access to care, and utilize culturally appropriate interventions and referrals when needed.

Key References and Resources

  • DSM-5-TR Section I: Cultural and Social Structural Issues; Impact of Racism and Discrimination on Psychiatric Diagnosis.
  • DSM-5-TR: Cultural Concepts of Distress, Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI), and Supplementary Modules; online availability of core and informant versions.
  • Examples of cultural concepts of distress and their cross-cultural manifestations provide templates for recognizing culturally shaped presentations across diverse populations.

Summary Takeaways

  • Culture, race, and ethnicity are central to understanding illness experiences and diagnostics in psychiatry; avoid overgeneralization or stereotyping while acknowledging the influence of sociocultural contexts.
  • The Cultural Formulation provides a structured, patient-centered framework to capture cultural identity, distress concepts, stressors and supports, coping, help-seeking patterns, and clinician-patient dynamics.
  • The Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) operationalizes this framework through a core set of questions (plus informant and supplementary modules) that can be adapted to any clinical setting and population.
  • Cultural concepts of distress offer a nuanced lens to interpret symptoms, risk, and treatment needs, bridging local understandings with DSM-5-TR criteria and improving diagnostic clarity and patient engagement.