Introduction
What is a Market Failure?
Causes of Market Failure
Government Intervention and Market Failure
Government Failure
Examples of Government Failure
Conclusion
The market creates an enabling environment for efficient resource allocation.
Firms seek income and profit maximization, constantly entering or exiting markets based on economic factors.
The price mechanism and market equilibrium contribute to sustainability.
Markets may fail to operate optimally due to various factors preventing productive efficiency, especially in common ownership scenarios.
Government intervention becomes necessary, but potential government failure also exists.
Market failure occurs when the price mechanism results in inefficient resource allocation.
Defined as a situation where the forces of demand and supply cannot allocate resources effectively.
Several factors disrupt the price mechanism in resource allocation:
Externalities
Free-rider Problems
Asymmetric Information
Arise when production/consumption harms third parties (e.g., pollution).
Negative Externality: Environmental damage affecting communities (e.g., polluted rivers).
Positive Externality: Benefits to third parties from a product that would be underproduced by market forces.
Occurs when the benefits of a product exceed private benefit, making it unprofitable in a market context.
Efficiency in markets is best achieved through two-party agreements.
Free-rider problems emerge when non-payers can benefit from goods/services.
Exists when some participants in a transaction have more information than others.
Leads to market inefficiency as consumers may rely on more informed producers.
Used strategically, knowledgeable producers can direct consumer choices, potentially resulting in market failure.
Various approaches address different types of market failures.
Methods include:
Market-based instruments
Government spending
Publicity and information initiatives
Government regulations
Negative Externalities: Taxes and levies (e.g., landfill tax).
Free-Rider Problems: Provision of public goods, tax relief for contamination clean-up.
Asymmetric Information: Green deal initiatives, energy performance certificates.
Tax collection for 2023-2024: £829.1 billion.
Major components: Income Tax, Capital Gains Tax, National Insurance Contributions (57%).
VAT and business taxes comprise 21% and 10%, respectively.
Recent taxation patterns focus on modifying private expenditure while also raising revenue.
Taxation incentives affect consumption patterns moving towards electric and fuel-efficient vehicles.
Aims to promote alternative waste disposal methods.
Classified into lower rates for non-toxic waste and standard rates for other types.
Construction industry incurs significant waste and pays £3.30/tonne for lower rates and £103.70/tonne for standard rates.
Tax applied to energy usage by businesses/non-domestic sectors.
Charged per kilowatt with varied rates according to energy source (e.g., electricity taxed higher than coal).
Aimed at motivating businesses to account for their negative externalities.
Charged on the commercial use of natural aggregates.
Excludes exported aggregates in the UK.
Designed to minimize noise and environmental impact from quarrying.
Encourages recycling and reduction of aggregate demand in construction.
Addresses excludability related to the free-rider problem by promoting public goods.
Public goods examples: National security, street lighting.
Categories of goods include public, private, and quasi-public goods.
Public goods facilitate government intervention to supply goods/services that generate external benefits.
Tax relief serves as incentives for the private sector to innovate beneficially for society.
Involves setting regulatory standards and providing information to guide market decisions.
Less likely to increase business costs but can be viewed as generally ineffective.
Involves legislation to manage business decisions and minimize negative externalities.
Example: Building Regulations to control construction standards.
Government efforts to raise awareness and support market decisions, addressing transparency issues.
Example: The Carbon Trust helps with low-carbon technology opportunities.
Many government interventions to address market failures have proven ineffective.
Raises the question of whether markets could allocate resources more efficiently than bureaucratic government systems.
Summarizes causes of market failure alongside interventions:
Externalities: Taxation/levies
Free-Rider Problem: Public goods, tax credits
Asymmetric Information: Campaigns, building regulations enforcement
Government accountability for negative externalities can be obscured due to difficulty in measurement.
Examples include business activities impacting ecosystem integrity which are hard to quantify.
Free-rider problems hinder effective provision of public goods; costs are shared indirectly through taxes.
Citizens may essentially work for the state’s tax obligations early in a calendar year.
Rule-based interventions incur costs for implementation and compliance oversight.
Example: Non-compliance with Building Regulations often goes unpunished.
Suggests policies may not improve economic efficiency.
Factors causing government failure include poor judgment, lack of information, corruption, and bureaucratic inefficiency.
Increased government intervention may reduce individual liberty and competitive market dynamics.
Intended to curb excessive rental prices in housing markets through maximum pricing policies.
Failure arises as rent caps dissuade landlords, reduce rental stock, and can lead to black markets.
Aims to stabilize volatile EU agricultural market prices and guarantee minimum income for farmers.
Causes economic burden due to excess supplies purchased by the government, promoting overproduction.
Intended to alleviate road traffic and enhance public transport’s accessibility and affordability.
Policy fails as public transport remains less preferred by higher earners and may still be costly for taxpayers.
Aims to handle excessive fishing depleting resources.
Failure evidenced by continuous depletion of stocks and wasteful discard practices.
Monitoring and enforcement raise significant costs.