This lecture aims to provide an understanding of implementation science and its application in healthcare.
Key objectives include understanding implementation science, the Surgical Safety Checklist, processes in implementation, gaps in understanding, interventions, and research gaps.
Improvement Science
Terms related to improvement science include:
Knowledge mobilization
Knowledge utilization
Quality improvement
Knowledge transfer
Knowledge translation
Implementation of Evidence
Implementation of evidence results in behavior change, which can involve:
Replacing a behavior
Rejecting a behavior
Adopting a new behavior
Occurring at individual, group, or system levels
WHO Surgical Safety Checklist
The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist, adapted for England and Wales, includes:
Sign In: Before anesthesia induction, verifying patient identity, site, procedure, consent, surgical site marking, anesthesia machine check, allergies, difficult airway/aspiration risk, and risk of significant blood loss (>500ml or 7ml/kg in children).
Time Out: Before surgical intervention, team members introduce themselves, and the surgeon, anesthetist, and nurse confirm patient name, procedure, site, position, anticipated blood loss, equipment requirements, specific concerns, ASA grade, monitoring equipment, sterility of instrumentation, equipment issues, SSI bundle, antibiotic prophylaxis, patient warming, hair removal, glycemic control, VTE prophylaxis, and essential imaging.
Sign Out: Before leaving the operating room, the registered practitioner confirms the procedure name, instrument/swab/sharp counts, specimen labeling, equipment problems, and key concerns for recovery.
Evidence-Based Medicine and the Surgical Safety Checklist
A study by Haynes et al. (2009) in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) demonstrated the impact of the Surgical Safety Checklist on reducing morbidity and mortality.
Outcomes Before and After Checklist Implementation
Table 5 from the NEJM article presents outcomes before and after checklist implementation across multiple sites.
Key metrics include surgical-site infection rates, unplanned returns to the operating room, pneumonia incidence, death rates, and overall complication rates.
Significant reductions were observed in surgical-site infections, mortality, and overall complications after checklist implementation.
Specific Data Points
Site 1: Surgical-Site Infection decreased from 4.0\% to 2.0\%, Unplanned Return to OR decreased from 4.6\% to 1.8\%, Death decreased from 1.0\% to 0.0\%, Any Complication decreased from 11.6\% to 7.0\%.
Site 5: Surgical-Site Infection decreased dramatically from 20.5\% to 3.6\%, Any Complication decreased from 21.4\% to 5.5\%.
Overall: Surgical-Site Infection decreased from 6.2\% to 3.4\%, Death decreased from 1.5\% to 0.8\%, Any Complication decreased from 11.0\% to 7.0\%.
Impact of the Checklist
The rate of death decreased from 1.5\% before the checklist to 0.8\% after (P=0.003).
Inpatient complications decreased from 11.0\% to 7.0\% (P<0.001).
Canadian Trial – NEJM 2014
A Canadian trial published in NEJM in 2014 assessed the impact of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist.
Pre-checklist (n=109,341): 30-day mortality rate of 0.71\%, complication risk of 3.86\%.
Post-checklist (n=106,370): 30-day mortality rate of 0.65\%, complication risk of 3.82\%.
Lack of Replication
In some instances the results of implementing the checklist weren't replicated, which raises the following questions.
Reasons for the lack of replication include different materials and protocols, different locations and contexts, and statistical regression to the mean.
Importance of Actual Use
Dr. Lucian Leape (Harvard, NEJM 2014) suggested that the likely reason for the failure to replicate results was that the checklist was not consistently used.
The behavior in the operating theatre didn't change.
Checklist as a Tool for Behavior Change
A checklist on its own has no power; its effectiveness depends on the surgical team incorporating it into their practice, leading to behavior change.
Behavior change can be a powerful force for good or ill.
Barriers and Facilitators of Implementation
A study by Russ et al. (Ann Surg 2015) evaluated the barriers and facilitators of implementing the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist across hospitals in England.
Implementation varied across hospitals, with some using preplanned/phased approaches.
Staff sometimes felt the checklist was imposed, and there were issues with integrating it into pre-existing processes.
The most common barrier was resistance from senior clinicians.
Determinants of Behavior
Behavior is influenced by internal and external factors, including:
Knowledge
Skills
Social/professional role and identity
Beliefs about capabilities
Beliefs about consequences
Motivation and goals
Memory, attention, and decision processes
Environmental context and resources
Social influences
Emotion
Behavioral regulation
Nature of the behaviors
Behavior Change Techniques (BCTs)
Susan Michie developed a taxonomy of behavior change techniques (93 at last count).
This taxonomy serves as a reference point for selecting BCTs to achieve specific behavioral outcomes.
Effective use of BCTs requires understanding the behavior change required and the behavior targeted for change.
Approaches to Changing Behavior in Healthcare
Various approaches exist for changing behavior in healthcare, including:
Public health campaigns (media, health service, schools)
Local commissioning of services (smoking, breastfeeding)
Education of healthcare staff (prevention programs)
Financial incentives (Quality and Outcomes Framework, Commission for Quality and Innovation)
Policing of services (Care Quality Commission)
Statins and Behavior Change Example
Statins are drugs used to lower cholesterol and reduce the risk of arterial blockage recurrence.
They should be prescribed in high doses of the cheapest form.
Obstacles to changing statin prescription practices include various prescriber and system-level factors.
Potential Interventions:
Educational programs for prescribers on statin use.
National media campaigns to inform patients.
Preventing the dispensing of more expensive statins without justification.
Implementing a pop-up notification in the computer system.
Blocking the prescription of expensive statins within the NHS.
Conducting an experiment to determine the most cost-effective approach.
NICE and Implementation
NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) is committed to implementing its guidance.
They offer >1100 pieces of guidance on guideline implementation in local settings.
Their approach is often common-sense, focusing on dissemination, audit, local service encouragement, and incentives.
However, there is limited evidence on what works best in each circumstance.
'Do Not Do' Recommendations
NICE makes 'do not do' recommendations, such as avoiding antipsychotics for ADHD treatment in adults.
Routine blood tests and ECGs are generally not recommended for people taking methylphenidate, dexamfetamine, and atomoxetine unless clinically indicated.
Drug treatment is not the first-line treatment for all school-age children with ADHD.
Cessation of Treatment
An example is the cessation of combined inhalers in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
In 2003, combination inhalers for COPD were introduced and became the most costly drugs in the NHS within three years.
Most COPD patients took them, even though they were only indicated for a minority.
Evidence published in 2013 showed it took six years for prescribing to fall (White P et al 2013 PLOS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075221).
Obstacles to Implementation
Common obstacles to implementation include:
Lack of experience in executors
Inadequate planning
Disorganized work culture
Poor readiness to change
Poor team structure
Lack of necessary resources
Lack of leadership
Lack of commitment
Lack of prioritization
Key Issues in Implementation Science
Implementation of evidence-based practice is about behavior change.
To achieve change, the behavior should be understood.
Understanding the behavior leads to the best change techniques.
Evidence of benefit does not ensure implementation in practice.
Interventions to implement change in healthcare should be tested.
The Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice
There is a significant financial investment in showing intervention efficacy/effectiveness.
However, the implementation of an intervention in clinical practice is rarely tested!