LECTURE 1- CRIM JUSTICE POLICY
Definition:
A complex network of police, prosecutors, courts, correctional agencies, and parole boards.
Functions:
Prevention, law enforcement, crime investigation
Court processing
Punishment of offenders
Characteristics:
Not coordinated:
Checks and balances, different mandates, conflicting interests.
Formal Systems
Legislators
Bureaucracy
Police
Courts
Prosecution/ Crown
Correctional Services
Parole Services
Informal Systems
Media Victim’s Groups
Defense Counsel
Factors Affecting Crime Reporting:
Must come to police attention.
Differences between police departments.
Social/economic factors
Definitional changes.
Limitations:
Not all crimes are reported.
Public confidence in police affects reporting.
Stats are political tools.
Three Rules of Crime Stats (Gardner):
Trends depend on positive/negative framing.
Critics’ reactions depend on direction of stats.
Violent incidents shift focus to negative stats.
Core Insights:
Safety and security as core government functions.
Relationships between citizens, state, and institutions.
Unique political science perspectives (e.g., institutionalism).
Strengths of Political Science for Studying Criminal Justice
Criminal justice policymaking as influenced by the political and policy process
elections matter
who is the government matters
the policies reflect the policy process and the politics
Provide insight into the relationships between citizens and the state, between government actors within the state
Theoretical, methodological and normative perspectives that differ/challenge those of sociology, criminology and law
brings a diff lens
institutionalism
Institutions vs Actors
Institutions
Laws
Rules
Policy
Structure
Actors
Politicians
Bureaucrats
Criminal Justice Actors
Reciprocal Relationship:
Institutions shape actors; actors shape institutions.
Examples: Police powers, constitutional impacts.
Policy Influences:
Westminster Parliamentary system (executive-dominated).
Federalism and constitutional power division.
Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Accountability:
Limits on actors’ power (checks and balances).
Mechanisms to ensure oversight (e.g., undercover policing).
Independence:
Judges have significant independence but require balance.
Purposes:
Define unacceptable behaviors.
Strengthen formal social controls.
Structure the justice system.
Regulate criminal justice officials' behavior.
Trigger actions leading to individual liberty deprivation.
Characteristics:
Fragmented: Different goals, roles, and ideologies.
Symbolic: Reflects public values and emotions.
Important to Note
High degree of fragmentation between courts, police, and corrections
All have different mandates and all different roles
What Diff Actors are Responsible For
Police
crime prevention
law enforcement
assistance of victims of crime
public order maintenance
emergency response
Crown
prosecute, but not to gain a conviction, to enforce law and maintain justice
provide legal advice, not what charges to lay
Represent the public interest
Defense
represent legal rights of the accused
help the accused navigate the criminal justice system
Corrections
carry out sentences through safe and humane custody and supervision
assist in the rehabilitation and reintegration of offenders
Constitution Act, 1867:
Federal: Criminal Code, prosecuting federal offences other than the criminal code, penitentiaries (> 2 years sentence), parole.
Provincial: Quasi-criminal law, prosecuting criminal code and criminal offences, sentences <2 years.
Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1982):
Sections 7-14: Protect legal rights (e.g., search/seizure, fair trials).
Section 24(2): Judges can exclude evidence if justice would be disreputed.
Remedy
Impact of the Charter
Defining what is criminal
Investigation stage
Pre-trial stage
Trial stage
Post-trial stage
Key Documents:
Criminal Code of Canada (CCC).
Youth Criminal Justice Act.
Other statutes (e.g., Firearms Act).
CCC Principles:
Offence Types:
Indictable (serious crimes, jury trial).
Summary (less serious, no jury).
Hybrid (prosecutor chooses).
Proof: Beyond reasonable doubt (actus reus + mens rea).
Bill C-51 (2019):
Removed “zombie laws” (e.g., dueling, witchcraft).
Focused on bail, jury selection.
Reclassified offences.
Need for Reform:
Criminal law reflects societal values but lacks systematic reviews.
LECTURE 2- EXECUTIVE AND FEDERALISM
Policy environment: contextual factors that influence actors in the system and decision-making about the system
Structural and demographic factors
demographics shape policy
regionalism shapes policy
social attitudes/ opinions
political ideology
social movements
Federalism, the most pervasive constraint on what governments can and cannot do
shapes almost every aspect of canadian politics
federalism- system fo two orders of government, that have their own specific constitutional jurisdiction
Executive, the core source of power
Political and bureaucracy
political exec in canada- prime minister, cabinet, provicial premeiers and their cabinets
Administration and execution of government functions
Crown (Head of State), represented by the Governor General and the Prime Minister + Cabinet
responsible for putting the policy into practice
Major decision-making and policy role
Centralization of power
key decision making forum
power of exec important for policy making environment
Political Executive: Criminal Justice
First minister – Prime Minister (federal) or Premier (provincial)
Attorney General/Minister of Justice
Solicitor-General – Minister of Public Safety (federal) or Solicitor General (Ontario)
Federal (Minister of Public Saftey)- David Mcginty?
Provicial (Solitcor General)- Michael Curtsner
In some provinces, the Solicitor General and the A.G./Minister of Justice are housed in the same department (e.g. Nova Scotia, New Brunswick)
Created in 1966
was not a formal member of cabinet until then
Primary responsibilities: domestic security; RCMP, parole and correctional services
CSIS was added in 1984
Significant restructuring in 2003
Now, Public Safety Canada
Response to 9/11 and SARS outbreak
important times for canadian emergency response
respond to natural disasters, public safety systems, resources
should the RCMP have to wear body cameras? should police have province wide systems? interjurisdictional policing for bigger issues?
CBSA- canadian border services agency
CSIS- canadian security intelligence service
CSC- correctional service canada
PBC- parole board of canada
RCMP- royal candian mounted police
review bodies
CRC for RCMP
OCI
conduct independent investigations related to correctional services
inmate complaints for ex
RCMP ERC
labour relations
union
Created in 2003
Combined the Customs and Revenue Agency with Citizenship and Immigration and Canadian Food Inspection Agency
admin legislation that govern the admissability of people and goods in canada
1,200 service locations in Canada and 39 other countries
Detention centres in Laval, Toronto, Kingston and Vancouver
Since 2006, some officers are armed
Main Responsibilities:
Criminal Investigation and Prosecutions
lay charges
Intelligence
Border Watch
responsible for more than 90 diff types of laws
regulation, legislation, international agreements
Created in 1984
Response to the McDonald Commission on RCMP activities in the 1970s
Pre-CSIS: RCMP Security Service
Involved in many illegal and unsavory activities
1970 FLQ/October Crisis and proactive strategy
had a lot of problems
started in the 1970s, the october crisis
FLQ kidnapped a prov cabinet minister and a british diplomat
one was murdered
domestic terrorist organization
radical thing to happen in a democracy
RCMP did some illegal things in response
broke into political office and stole things
burnt down a barn where a meeting was to be held
committed 400 illegal break ins that were not ordered by the government
spied on individuals, Tommy Douglas (father of universal healthcare in canada, considered a socialist)
they gathered info on him illegally
Institutional problems with the RCMP Security Service
all the powers of police, but a large degree of independence
removed from the other parts of the RCMP
Responsible for collecting, analyzing, reporting and disseminating intelligence threats to national security
Covert and overt
covert- undercover
Domestic and international
work within canada and international
CIVILIAN AGENCY
cannot investigate lawful activity, do not hold the same powers as the police
No restriction on where CSIS can collect information
Over 2,000 employees, 85 languages spoken
CSIS subject to criticism:
Aggressive tactics
federal court critized for not being transparent or being aggressive to get what they want
Excessive secrecy
often dont know what they are doing
lack of transparency
national security and _______ of parlimentarians
review a lot of what CSIS does
Created in 2002
Correctional services
Provincial facilities (< 2 years)
Probation and parole offices
Public Safety and Security
Fire and emergency services
Scientific investigations, coroner
Policing Services
All municipal police services in Ontario
Ontario Provincial Police
Regulation of private security individuals/agencies
How much influence should the Solicitor General have over the operations of the police and correctional facilities?
where do we draw the line?
Problems with transparency and reform
Jahn v. Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services (long title for sol. general)
human rights violation in 2012
held by ottawa detention center
alleges removed from gen pop for the entirety of her sentence, over 200 days
in 2013, agree to a settlement
some had to do with changing how they treat people with mental illness
ont agreed expect as a last resort
2018, have to issue a consent order to force the ministry into the agreement
shows the challenges of forcing the ministry to make changes
challenging to monitor their administration
Is there a distinction between policy and operation?
department is respon for policy
where to draw the line from creating policy and the operation of that policy
dont want the government telling police who or what to investigate
police could be used for political inquiry
Should the Solicitor General be held responsible for actions of front-line officers?
the reverse
Political member of Cabinet
Chief legal officer
Federal- ??
Provincial- Doug Downey
department that helps coordinate between departments
privy counsel office for ex
DOJ is the oldest, 1968
Political Role: Minister of Justice
Develop criminal justice policy
amendments to the CC
Represent views of DOJ at Cabinet, including funding/budget
Communicate overall direction from Cabinet to department
Answer to Parliamentfor policy and administration of criminal justice
Legal Role: Attorney General
Offer legal advice to government and provide legal defence
Administration of justice, including Crowns and courts
Justice – wrongful convictions, conviction review, pardons
Advise Parliament on the constitutionality of government legislation
two roles vs having just one → makes sure that the attorney general has a place on the cabinet, legal issues are heard in cabinet
Department of Justice Canada
first female lawyer on DOJ- 1939
Section 92(14) of the Constitution Act, 1867: prosecution of the criminal law is the responsibility of provincial attorneys general
Offences not in the Criminal Code
Controlled Drug and Substances Act, Firearms Act
The Minister of Justice/A.G. Canada does not personally conduct litigation
delegated to federal crown attorneys
Director of Public Prosecutions and Public Prosecution Service of Canada (established in 2006)
even more delegated by ^
appointed for a 7 year term, cannot be reappointed
just because it is seperate, odes not mean there is no influence from the attorney general
Section 13 notices
must keep AG informed on cases of significance
for the AG to become involved
most of the time they dont get invovled, just to keep them informed
Same dual roles as federal: legal and political
Criminal prosecutions
S.92 Constitution Act, 1867
Carried out by the Crown Attorney
Does not direct charges to be laid
The decision to proceed with a charge is the power of the Attorney General
once the police lay the charges, it is transfer to the attorney general to decide if they will be charged
screening(most important part of the AG’s job)- stage in prosecution where they can decide to withdraw charges, decide it someon eshould be released or if they shoul dgo back into custody after trial
crown may provide advice for what charges to lay, but police lay the charges
Administration of justice
Court services
Legal Aid (operated via an independent board)
Arms- Length Organization
One of the most senior portfolios in Cabinet
Canadian practice of bijuralism (the practice of two legal traditions, in canada= common and civil law)
Justice ministers have become prominent members of cabinet when governments undertake large-scale reform
John Turner during Criminal Code reform in late 1960s
Jean Chretien during constitutional negotiations in the early 1980s
Expansion of role in post-Charter era
we rely of the ministry of justice to ensure constitutionality
provide legal advice on how strong the cases will be in court
Section 4.1 of Department of Justice Act
empowers the MOJ to issue a report if a governments propsed legislation is unconstitutional
no MOJ has ever issues this report
poltical role and legal rule conflicting
Respect for the constitution before policy considerations
Department of Justice has an important role to play in every piece of legislation
Responsibility of resolving legal or Charter based conflicts between departments
prosecuted for bribary, charged with fraud and corruption (crim charges)
if convicted, they would be blocked from competing for fed government contracts for a decade
Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA)
available to corps, spares them a trial and possible conviction to just pay a penalty
escapes the criminal consequence
reasons
when a corp is prosecuted criminally, could have major repercussions on people who had no idea about what was happening
cause a lot of financial impact
Director of Public Prosecutions
decided they were not eligable
MOJ at the time gets invovled
because the company is a huge company mainly in quebec, and quebec is an important province for the liberals
JT was calling and meeting with the MOJ who was also a liberal
MOJ came out with it and said she was being pressured
SNC demonstrates the challenging of the political and legal role of the MOJ conflict with eachother
constitutional convention
holds that the AG must be guided by public interest
cabinet cannot direct, only provide advice
Prosecutorial Independence
Quasi-judicial role
Shawcross doctrine
Should the Minister of Justice and the Attorney General be two separate people?
delibrate choice at confederation
they have perspective over the entire justice system
Division of powers: shared sovereignty between a central governing authority and constituent political units
Inter-state federalism: relations between two equal, autonomous and independent orders of government
But not isolated actors!
The delivery of many programs and services require partnership and cooperation
Division of Powers Disputes
Provinces are responsible for funding a large portion of the criminal justice system
Federal government responsible for creating legislation that have large impact on the provinces
Central area for dispute in criminal justice:
Federal government - criminal law
Provincial governments - administration of justice; property and civil rights
Provinces can enact legislation for public order and safety
Impose fines, penalties and imprisonment
Firearms registry
Competing ideas at Confederation:
National uniformity in the criminal law
Local justice
Some practices and systems already in place at Confederation
Prosecution
Municipal police
local police pre date the constitution
Criminal law seen as a unifying force
john a mcdonald
Creation of a check in the system
Historically, prosecution deemed a local matter
Private prosecution until 1857
Avoiding American practice substantive criminal law at the state level
each state has its own crim code
Definition of crime to be uniform across Canada, but balanced with local prosecution
crim law is the only policy area where functional separation is seen between federal and provincial law
What happens when a provincial government does not agree with federal created criminal law?
Wynne government in Ontario disagrees with Bill C-36
Response to Supreme Court decision in Canada v. Bedford (2013)
Could a government avoid prosecuting a law it did not support?
Provide an important check and balance on federal power
Provinces do not prosecute federally created criminal law in a mechanical way
Prosecutors have wide discretionary powers
Objections?
Increase arbitrariness
Violate the rule of law
Introduces politics
Already considerable variance across provinces
Federal criminal law as a baseline
Shawcross Doctrine
Reasonable likelihood of conviction
Public interest
Powerful example of the checks and balances made possible through the federal division of powers and criminal law
Provincial jurisdiction
Ontario and Quebec only provinces to exclusively provide policing on a provincial scale
Ontario Provincial Police est. 1909
Sûreté du Québec est. 1870
all other provs rely on the RCMP in some capacity
Based on a cost share between province and federal government
Benefits
National presence and standards
sovereignty
used to stake the govs claim on land?
Drawbacks
Bureaucracy
does not do things quick, slow to adapt to tech and other changes
hard time filling positions
Lack of local connection
trained in one specific area, regina
not effective policing, dont understand the community
Surrey, B.C.
voted to get rid of the rcmp as its muni police force
got rid of them in november of 2024
Alberta
Grande Prairie, did not want the rcmp as the muni, able to adjust much faster than surrey
concerned about their crime severity rating
getting rid of rcmp as its provicial police force, too expensive
empowering alberta sheriffs
National policing functions
International crimes
Matters that transcend provincial borders
CPIC
Tensions with contract policing
History of RCMP and Indigenous peoples