synthesizes.pdf

Article 1: A Bilingual Advantage for Episodic Memory in Older Adults

  • Research Focus: Correlation between episodic memory and bilingualism in older adults.

  • Researchers: Scott R. Schroder and Viorica Marian.

  • Participant Demographics:

    • Total: 36 older adults.

    • Age Range: 73 to 88 years old.

    • Gender Ratio: 17 males, 19 females.

    • Groups: Split into bilingual and monolingual (using self-reported fluency questionnaires).

  • Experiment Design:

    • Episodic Memory Measurement:

      • Participants shown photos quickly.

      • Required to recall all remembered photos.

      • Evaluation based on average recall.

    • Simon Task:

      • Task involved sorting blue and brown rectangles.

      • Measured inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility.

  • Results:

    • Bilingual group recalled an average of 12.0 pictures, monolingual group only 7.3 pictures.

    • Indicates significant correlation between bilingualism and memory due to stronger neural connections that support recalling two languages.

    • Bilinguals showed better inhibitory control in the Simon Task compared to monolingual participants.

  • Conclusion: Findings support initial hypothesis of bilingualism enhancing episodic memory and cognitive flexibility due to enhanced neural connections.


Article 2: Language-Dependent Memory in Bilingual Learning

  • Research Focus: Investigating how memory recall changes based on language of encoding.

  • Researchers: Viorica Marian and Caitlin M. Fausey.

  • Participant Demographics:

    • Total: 24 bilingual English-Spanish speakers from Chile.

    • Used self-report questionnaires for language proficiency.

  • Variables of Interest:

    • Language of encoding (language learned in) and language of retrieval (language recalled).

  • Experiment Design:

    • Participants taught material in both English and Spanish with equal time dedicated to each.

    • Recall assessed in either language after teaching.

    • Measured to obtain reaction times and accuracy during recall.

  • Results:

    • Higher accuracy and quicker retrieval when encoding and retrieval languages matched.

    • Better performance in Spanish than in English overall (indicating native language effects).

    • Language switching negatively affects retrieval speed and accuracy.

  • Conclusion: Supports the hypothesis that consistent language usage during encoding and retrieval optimizes memory performance. Switching languages reduces effectiveness in recall.