Desistance: The phenomenon where crime rates decline as offenders age; often referred to as the "aging-out process."
Motivations for Crime: Individuals may commit crimes for various reasons, including thrill-seeking, greed, revenge, or simply for enjoyment.
Situational Crime Prevention: Strategies aimed at reducing opportunities for crime by altering the environment.
General Deterrence: Punishment aimed at the general populace to discourage crime.
Specific Deterrence: Punishment aimed at an individual offender to prevent them from re-offending.
Incapacitation: Removing offenders from society to prevent them from committing further crimes.
Utilitarianism: The principle that actions should promote the greatest happiness for the greatest number.
Free Will in Behavior: Individuals choose their actions, including criminal behavior, freely.
Social Contract: Society provides protection in exchange for individuals choosing to limit personal freedom.
The law should govern harmful actions only; moral behavior should not be legislated.
Presumption of innocence and protection from torture.
Laws should be clear and written in advance, with predictable punishments.
Punishments must be necessary, limited, swift, certain, and severe to deter crime effectively.
Popularized Cesare Beccaria's ideas, bringing them to British attention.
Advocated that laws must enhance community happiness.
Prevent all criminal offenses.
Convince offenders to commit the least serious crime.
Ensure use of minimal force necessary.
Prevent crime as cheaply as possible.
A design for a prison that allows constant observation of inmates without them knowing when they are being watched.
Compliance results from the risk of detection.
Adopted formally in France's Declaration of the Rights of Man (1789) allowing only lawful punishments for harmful actions.
Emphasized stopping torture and ensuring humane treatment.
Choice theory/classical criminology saw renewed interest in the 1970s.
James Q. Wilson: Suggested that social conditions do not cause crime; people are driven by the lack of inhibition and thrill-seeking.
A conservative policy shift emphasized harsh punishments.
Offense-Specific Crime: Criminals evaluate characteristics specific to crimes, such as potential targets.
Offender-Specific Crimes: Offenders assess their skills and capabilities relating to committing a crime.
Economic Circumstances: Transition away from crime occurs if legal opportunities offer better financial rewards.
Perception of Risk: A higher perceived risk than potential rewards will lead to desistance from crime.
Agnew’s Perspective: Criminals often exhibit traits of lack of self-control and are less deterred by punishment.
Location Choice: Factors such as low risk of capture and convenience influence where crimes occur.
Target Characteristics: Example: home burglaries are influenced by whether occupants are home and the presence of security measures.
Crime results from a decision-making process weighing risks vs. rewards.
Crime occurs when a suitable target is not defended by competent guardians.
Highlights interaction of motivation (offender), opportunity, and target characteristics.
Auto Theft: Target selection is based on making low-risk, high-reward choices (e.g., certain car models).
Sex Work: Workers take calculated risks concerning safety, health, and client choice.
Drug Dealing: Decisions on dealing often hinge on maximizing profit while minimizing risk.
Instrumental Crimes: Committed to achieve tangible benefits.
Violent Crimes: Often based on emotions such as revenge or provocation, despite a rational component to target choice.
Crime prevention methods include fortifying access to targets and increasing surveillance.
Focus on making offenders fear consequences of crime through mandatory sentences and enforcement strategies.
Aimed at individuals to reduce recidivism through harsh punishments.
Enforcing longer sentences to keep potential offenders off the streets.
Increasing Efforts: Implementing harder targets.
Increasing Risks: Employing enhanced surveillance systems.
Reducing Rewards: Making illegal activities less lucrative.
Inducing Guilt or Shame: Using social mechanisms like sex offender registries.
Includes individuals or groups responsible for monitoring targets, offenders, or locations.
Ranges from personal (family) to general (community members).
A strong relationship exists between crime rates and perceived likelihood of punishment—certainty plays a central role over severity.
Social influences, like disapproval from family and peers, can act as more significant deterrents than formal legal punishments.
Many chronic offenders do not deter from crime due to initial positive reinforcements of their actions.
Reintegrative Shaming: Encourages offenders to acknowledge wrongdoings while supporting reintegration into society.
Examples of cultures that emphasize public apology and restoration.
Discussion about the rise in incarceration rates and its modest effectiveness in crime prevention.
Offenders deserve punishment proportional to their crimes.
Preventing added human suffering from the punishment process.
Recognizing the potential for punishment to curb future crimes.
Examines physical or psychological traits that may predispose individuals to crime.
Differentiates between biological and psychological origins of criminal behavior.
Lombroso's concept of "born criminals" dismissed due to lack of control groups.
Focus on the interplay of biology and environment in shaping behavior.
Genetic traits like aggression and psychopathy have been linked to criminality.
Freud's theories emphasize early childhood experiences on later behavior, including potential for delinquency.
High prevalence of mental illness among serious offenders, indicating systemic issues impacting these populations.
Impulsivity, aggression, and sociopathy are significant markers linked to criminal behavior.
Examines how socio-cultural environments influence crime patterns rather than solely individual characteristics.
Discusses how poverty and wealth disparities impact crime rates and perpetuate cycles of disadvantage.
Overrepresentation of minority groups in lower classes and the criminal justice system underlines systemic inequities.
Highlights the role of family, peers, and broader social institutions in the development of criminal behavior.