Latin America: Problems and Promise - Comprehensive Study Notes
1. Colonial Legacies
**Spanish and Portuguese Rule (1492
–1820s):**
- Established extractive economies, focusing on commodities like silver in Mexico and Peru, and sugar in Brazil and the Caribbean.
- The encomienda and hacienda systems led to significant land concentration in the hands of colonial elites.
- Instituted rigid racial hierarchies: Europeans occupied the top, while Indigenous peoples and Africans were relegated to the bottom.
Impact on Development:
Created entrenched long-lasting inequality and a dependency on commodity exports.
Political institutions were designed primarily to serve the interests of colonial elites, not the majority population.
2. Independence and Nation-Building (Early 19^{th} Century)
Creole Elites: Descendants of Europeans born in the Americas, these groups spearheaded the independence revolutions.
Outcome: Achieved political independence, but the underlying social and economic structures largely retained their colonial characteristics.
Marginalization: Indigenous and Afro-descendant populations continued to face marginalization and exclusion.
3. Economic Patterns After Independence
Export Economies:
Latin American economies became heavily reliant on the export of raw materials and agricultural products such as coffee, sugar, copper, silver, nitrates, beef, and wheat.
Integration into the global economy primarily served to reinforce economic dependency on world markets.
Boom-and-Bust Cycles:
Volatility in commodity prices drove economic instability.
Examples include the guano boom in Peru and the rubber boom in Brazil, which led to temporary prosperity followed by economic decline.
Foreign Influence:
Britain was the dominant foreign investor in the 19^{th} century, financing infrastructure like railroads, banking, and mining operations.
British influence was later supplanted by the United States, particularly after the 1898 Spanish-American War.
4. Political Instability
Caudillismo: Characterized by personalist, authoritarian rule exercised by local strongmen known as caudillos.
This led to frequent coups, weak state institutions, and significant regional fragmentation.
Notable examples include Santa Anna in Mexico and Juan Manuel de Rosas in Argentina.
Liberal vs. Conservative Conflicts:
Liberals advocated for policies such as free trade, secularization of society, and land reform.
Conservatives typically defended the privileges of the Catholic Church, maintained social hierarchies, and protected the interests of landed elites.
5. Social Structure and Inequality
Land Concentration:
Large estates, known as latifundia, formed the dominant feature of rural life.
Peasants and Indigenous communities were frequently dispossessed of their communal lands.
Race and Class:
Social mobility was severely restricted, and a concept of racial and class hierarchies remained deeply ingrained and influential in society.