Chapter 6 - Natural Law (Blackboard)

Introduction to Natural Law Theory

  • Natural Law Theory follows Divine Command Theory, especially for theists who see its potential.
  • It offers a way to discuss morality that seeks natural bases for right and wrong, appealing to both believers and non-believers.

Definition of Natural Law Theory

  • Broad category of normative theories.
  • Core idea: Actions are considered right if they are natural and wrong if they are unnatural.
  • Determining the morality of actions involves assessing their naturalness.

Complexity of Naturalness

  • The concept of natural vs. unnatural is simplified: needs further clarification.
  • Different interpretations exist within Natural Law Theory.

Advantages of Natural Law Theory

  1. Objective Morality

    • Can serve as a foundation for objective morality.
    • Right and wrong can be seen as facts tied to the nature of reality.
    • Morality is based on how things are, not subjective belief.
  2. Moral Knowledge

    • Addresses how moral knowledge is possible.
    • David Hume's challenge: all knowledge arises from understanding conceptual truths or empirical observations.
    • Natural Law theorists argue moral truths are observable through understanding purposes/functions of nature.

Hume's Argument on Knowledge of Moral Claims

  • First Premise: Knowledge arises from conceptual truths (meaning-based) or empirical truths (observation-based).

  • Distinguishes between:

    • Conceptual truths: Learn through definitions without observation (e.g., "triangles have three sides").
    • Empirical truths: Based on sensory experience (e.g., "there are five trees in the yard").
  • Second Premise: Moral claims (e.g., "lying is good") cannot be conceptual truths since they can be debated and justified differently.

  • Third Premise: Moral claims cannot be observational, as wrongness isn't a physical observable.

Natural Law Response to Hume

  • Natural Law theorists reject the third premise, believing wrongness can be observed.
  • Morality linked to the function/purpose of things, examined through our senses.
  • Decision-making hinges on whether an action facilitates or hinders an entity’s purpose.
    • Example: Glasses help vision -> good; jamming a finger in the eye -> bad.

Fitness Model of Natural Law Theory

  • Most common interpretation today.
  • Right actions promote survival; wrong actions hinder survival.
  • Survival can refer to:
    • Life: continuing to live.
    • Genetic Material: survival through descendants.
    • Species: ensuring the continuation of a species.

Application of Natural Law Theory

  • Commonly reflected in the teachings of the Catholic Church.
  • Opposition to Capital Punishment: Ends life, hinders survival, thus seen as morally wrong.
  • Sexual Ethics Debate:
    • Church's stance against birth control: sexual organs' purpose is reproduction.
    • Actions that prevent reproduction are labeled wrong, emphasizing the survival of genes and species.
  • Same-Sex Relationships:
    • Church argues actions, not people, are wrong based on lack of reproductive potential.

Summary and Next Steps

  • The fitness model offers a framework for assessing moral questions based on survival and purpose.
  • Further discussions on objections to Natural Law Theory will be explored in future content.