FW 404: Uneven-aged Systems, 9/4-9/9
Uneven-aged Systems
Create multi-age (greater than 2 ages) stand
Generally, depends on natural regeneration
Low impact on aesthetics since some trees are left and doesn’t look bad to the public
Used to regenerate:
shade-tolerant (like sugar maple)
intermediate shade tolerant
many oaks
longleaf pine
Implementation
Promote small and large trees
Frequent harvest (15-30 years)
cutting cycle is the period between harvests
EX: if our rotation age is 100 years (reach maturity), and we want 4 age classes, what is our cutting cycle? → 25 years
Remove low volume in each harvest
Q-factor
multiplier between age classes that we use to find the ideal distribution of age classes on the landscape
remove trees from each age classto maintain Q-factor
Q-Factor

Why is this not a practical way to manage the forest?
Little trees have a higher chance of dying, so higher risk
Target Q-factor is 1.5
Tree Size Distribution

increasing number of small trees that will hopefully make it to next age class
inverse J-shape on side is the ideal = 1.5
make sure to remove trees from each age class to allow room to grow
Single-tree selection
Individual trees removed
Regeneration in light gaps
Promotes shade-tolerant trees
Not the commercial species of the SE
Promotes vertical structure
Small openings throughout promote vertical structure
Single-tree Selection Structure regarding harvest



Group Selection
Create multi-tree openings (<0.5 ha)
Can favor less shade-tolerant species
Larger for specific objectives
Promotes vertical and horizontal structure
Group opening= ~2x height of adjacent trees, but not an exact answer. Typically less than an acre
Group-selection Opening After
After:
edge of canopy is drip line, limits regeneration
pre-harvest: single tree selection, consider light tolerance (shade tolerant)
establishment cut: Group selection, remove groups of trees, trees favor a little more light
post-removal cut: shelterwood, leave overstory or keep it (2h or single h stand)
Patch Cuts Are Even-aged
Small clearcuts or large group selection?
Patch clearcutting is an even-aged regeneration methods, patch cutting is small clearcuts
Area regulation rather than by tree size
Defined best by intent of the manager
could be considered group selection, depending on intention
Uneven-aged OR patch cut

harvest different portions at different times
Group selection effects on vegetation
promotes vertical structure
promotoes horizontal patchiness
promotes plant species richness
retains canopy
interspersion of forage and cover
hard mast production
patches of browse and low cover
Group selection effects on wildlife
High within-stand wildlife richness
Canopy and understory species
Forest and some shrubland birds
not species of large disturbances
Turkeys nest in openings
Grouse broods in openings
Deer bed and forage in openings
eat acorns adjacent to openings
Challenges with uneven-aged silviculture
cost of frequent harvest
large trees outcompete small trees
mixed species vary in biology
light, water, nutrient requirements
Allowing light for shade-intolerants
Cutting small trees before commercial harvest
< habitat for shrubland species
Damage to residuals and skid trails
Bettering Uneven-aged stands
Retain snags and downed logs
Avoid high-grading
Avoid residual tree damage
Take care with skid trails
Make openings 0.5 to 1 acre
used by shrubland species
Promote more shade-intolerant trees
Single-tree selection harvests:
A
are used in an uneven-aged silvicultural system
B
promote vertical vegetation structure
C
favor shade-tolerant tree species
D
all of the above
E
none of the above
…
Which of the following is a true statement?
A
preservation allows the wise use of natural resources
B
a proximate factor triggers the release of an innate habitat selection behavior
C
"selection" implies that animals are exploiting resources proportionate to their availability
D
all of the above
E
none of the above