Modules Covered
Module 29: What Is Intelligence?
Module 30: Intelligence Assessment and Dynamics
Module 31: Genetics and Environmental Influences on Intelligence
Definition: Intelligence is the ability to learn from experience, solve problems, and adapt to new situations.
Cultural Aspect: The concept of intelligence is socially constructed and varies across cultures.
Charles Spearman: Proposed the concept of general intelligence (g), suggesting that individuals who excel in one area often perform well in others.
L. L. Thurstone: Criticized Spearman, asserting that intelligence consists of seven primary mental abilities, rather than a single factor.
Research Consensus: While there are various abilities, evidence supports the existence of general intelligence (g).
Components:
Fluid Intelligence (Gf): The ability to reason and think abstractly, which declines with age.
Crystallized Intelligence (Gc): Knowledge and skills acquired over time, increasing with age.
Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC): Integrates different abilities into a comprehensive framework recognizing general and specific abilities.
Howard Gardner: Identified eight intelligences (e.g., linguistic, logical-mathematical), later suggesting a ninth: existential intelligence.
Emphasizes that intelligence comes in diverse packages and reflects preferred learning styles.
Savant Syndrome: Cases such as Kim Peek illustrate unique skill combinations.
Robert Sternberg: Proposed three types of intelligence:
Analytical: Problem-solving skills.
Creative: Ability to generate new ideas.
Practical: Everyday task management.
Gardner vs. Sternberg:
Gardner focuses on multiple independent intelligences.
Sternberg suggests three interconnected intelligences contributing to success.
Common Ground: Both emphasize the importance of diverse abilities in achieving life successes.
Intelligence Tests: Assess mental aptitudes and compare them to others.
Aptitude Tests: Predict future performance based on capacity to learn.
Achievement Tests: Measure knowledge and skills already learned.
Francis Galton: Early attempts to measure intelligence; emphasized hereditary factors.
Alfred Binet: Developed the first practical IQ test to predict school performance, recognizing individual differences in learning rates.
Lewis Terman: Revised Binet's test into the Stanford-Binet IQ test, aiming to measure innate intelligence.
David Wechsler: Created widely used intelligence tests (WAIS and WISC) that yield a general intelligence score and specific scores for different cognitive abilities.
Standardization: Establishing uniform procedures and score meanings compared to a normed group.
Reliability: Consistency of scores across different testing times or forms.
Validity: Accuracy in measuring what the test is intended to measure.
Identical twins show high correlation in IQ, suggesting a strong genetic component.
Heritability estimates range from 50% to 80%, indicating genetics play a significant role, but not absolute.
Environmental differences increasingly predict intelligence scores in diverse settings.
Adoption studies show improvement in intelligence when children are placed in nurturing environments.
Adverse conditions can hinder cognitive development (e.g., deprivation in orphanages).
Emphasizes the importance of enriching environments to enhance potential.
Encourages viewing intelligence as malleable, fostering resilience and adaptability in learning contexts.
Overemphasis can lead to self-blame for difficulties.
Stereotypical perceptions impact self-esteem regarding intelligence.
Men and women show only minor differences in overall intelligence scores, but exhibit strengths in different areas (e.g., spatial vs. verbal).
Intelligence scores show group differences; however, these do not determine individual capabilities.
Factors such as education, socioeconomic status, and environment are critical to understanding these differences.
Cultural Bias: Tests may not predict behavior uniformly across different cultural groups.
Negative stereotypes can impair performance, especially under pressure, impacting individuals' test results based on race or gender.
Interventions, such as reducing reminders of group identity, can mitigate these effects.