The interpretation of the past relies on present-day voices; denying one's own voice disconnects us from history.
Western societies celebrated the third millennium as an indication of progress, accompanied by a collective identity shaped by memory and forgetfulness.
The past can be selectively remembered or forgotten, affecting the collective identity.
Examples of selective memory: Military defeats or shameful policies may be forgotten, while glorious revolutions might be celebrated.
Martin Luther King Day is an example of mixed remembrance (celebration and shame).
The notion of a new millennium was associated with a break from the past, seen as obsolete or disposable.
Historical atrocities (e.g., two world wars, the Holocaust) raise questions on how societies can mourn mass loss amid a culture that emphasizes moving forward.
Francis Bacon emphasized the rejection of past philosophies to build a foundation for modern power.
His perspective marked a radical departure from previous understandings of power as limited resources.
Bacon's view of power focused on inventing it through knowledge, connecting power with human ingenuity.
This marks a shift from power as the divine right of kings to a more systematic, scientific approach.
There was a need for a complete overhaul of the mind to align it with the quest for power.
Bacon advocated for a rigorous pursuit of truth and a method of inquiry that views nature as both a laboratory and a conquest.
He distinguished his method from prior knowledge by emphasizing organization and institutional support to nurture scientific inquiry.
Advances in knowledge and technology transformed human existence from the 17th century onward, leading to rising economic standards and life improvements.
Modern society's achievements came at the cost of previous practices and institutions, culminating in significant destruction during events like Hiroshima.
This exemplifies how modern power required the dismantling of established norms and values.
Social movements catalyzed the formation of modern power, leading to political transformations.
These revolutions occasionally enhanced liberties, but they could also lead to dictatorship and marginalization of the lower strata.
Economically, power dynamics shifted towards the elite; workers often became subjects rather than citizens.
Economic theories developed alongside revolutions in politics and science but did not democratize in the same way; labor value recognized but power remains concentrated.
Historic attempts have been made to contain power, as seen in biblical examples (e.g., Solomon's Temple) symbolizing the challenges of controlling divinity and ambition.
Constitutional frameworks developed over time aimed to restrict power for stability and representation.
Aristotelian views stressed the need for constitutions that reflect actual power dynamics within society, acknowledging class disparities.
The evolution of bureaucracy played a significant role in centralizing power and distancing citizens from direct influence.
Modern constitutionalism aims for inclusiveness but often retains underlying class structures and regulatory powers that govern society.