JV

Pretrial and Trial Procedures - Chapter 10

Procedures Following Arrest
  • After an arrest, the accused is taken to the police station where possible criminal charges are listed and information is obtained for booking.

    • Booking includes recording suspect descriptions and offense circumstances.

    • Suspects may be fingerprinted, photographed, and participate in lineups.

    • Arrestees are usually detained until a criminal complaint is filed.

  • Complaint: A formal written document that:

    • Identifies the criminal charge.

    • Includes the date and place of the crime.

    • Details the circumstances of the arrest.

    • Is signed under oath by the complainant.

    • Requests the defendant's presence at an initial hearing (Arraignment).

  • Arraignment: The initial hearing where:

    • The judge informs the defendant of the charge.

    • Ensures proper representation by counsel.

    • Determines bail or other release pending hearing/trial.

  • The defendant may plead guilty (immediate case disposal) or not guilty (trial date set, release on bail).

  • For felonies, probable cause is proven via:

    • Indictment from a grand jury.

    • "Information" issued by a lower court.

  • Bail allows the defendant to prepare a defense in the community.

  • Some may enter court-based treatment programs early.

Bail
  • Bail is a form of security to secure release before trial, ensuring the defendant returns for trial.

    • Failure to appear results in forfeiture.

    • It cannot be used to punish the accused but enables defense preparation and prevents lengthy pretrial detention.

The Legal Right to Bail
  • Criminal defendants were traditionally eligible for release before trial.

  • The Statute of Westminster in 1275 set out bailable and non-bailable offenses.

  • The Judiciary Act of 1789 set conditions for bail, and the Eighth Amendment prohibits "excessive bail."

  • No constitutional right to bail exists; it should ensure the defendant returns for trial, not as punishment.

  • Defendants have the right to reasonable bail and bail review hearings.

  • Stack v. Boyle (1951): Bail is a traditional right to freedom before trial, permitting defense preparation and preventing punishment before conviction; it should align with similar offenses.

Making Bail
  • Most criminal defendants are released before trial.

  • Bail is considered at a court hearing, accounting for crime type, flight risk, and dangerousness.

  • Prior criminal records impact release.

  • Some jurisdictions use bail schedules for uniformity.

Alternative Bail Release Mechanisms
  • Police field citation release: Release on a written promise to appear in court at the time/location of arrest (common for misdemeanors).

  • Police station house citation release: Release deferred until after the arrestee is brought to the station house.

  • Police/pretrial jail citation release: Release deferred until after delivery to a jail for screening, booking, and admission.

  • Pretrial/court direct release by pretrial bail program: Pretrial programs release defendants without direct judicial involvement (typically for misdemeanors).

  • Police/court bail schedule: Posting bail at the station house or jail according to a schedule.

Types of Bail
  • Full cash bail: Payment of the full bail amount.

  • Deposit bail: Deposit a percentage of the bail amount which is returned when the defendant appears.

  • Surety bail: Paying a percentage to a bonding agent (fee not returned).

  • Conditional bail: Release based on abiding by specified conditions.

  • Unsecured bond: Release without immediate payment, liable for full amount if failure to appear.

  • Release on recognizance (ROR): Release without bail upon a promise to return for trial.

Pretrial Detention
  • Defendants ineligible for bail or ROR undergo pretrial detention.

  • Jails conditions are often poor.

  • Pretrial custody accounts for more U.S. incarceration than imprisonment after sentencing; over 60% of those in local jails are pretrial detainees.

  • High detention rates compared to Canada and Great Britain.

Reforming Criminal Justice: Eliminating Cash Bail
  • Kenneth Humphrey case: Highlighted issues of excessive bail for minor offenses disproportionately affecting the poor and violating the Eighth Amendment.

  • SB10 in California (2018):

    • Aimed to eliminate cash bail but was rejected by voters in 2020.

  • Arguments for and against eliminating cash bail:

    • Concerns over cost and court appearances vs. racial and economic equity.

  • National trends in bail reform: Various states are exploring bail reforms.

Evidence-Based Justice: Which Bail Release Mechanism is Most Effective?
  • Limited research on the most effective bail release mechanism.

  • BJS study: Pretrial misconduct was highest for unsecured bonds and emergency release, lowest for property bonds.

  • Recent Dallas study: Commercial bail was least likely to abscond, pretrial services least effective.

Pretrial Services
  • Defendants with community ties promise to appear without posting bail.

  • Reduce the importance of money bonds and bonding agents.

  • Federal Bail Reform Act of 1966 formalized conditions before money bail is required.

  • The Bail Reform Act of 1984 included prevention detention provisions.

Preventive Detention
  • Preventive detention statutes confine dangerous defendants before trial for their own and the community's protection.

  • The Bail Reform Act of 1984 allows judges to order preventive detention.

  • Schall v. Martin: Upheld preventive-detention statutes for juvenile defendants.

  • United States v. Salerno: Upheld the Bail Reform Act's denial of bail to dangerous defendants.

Pretrial Services
  • Help courts determine which defendants can safely be released on bail pending trial.

  • Services include gathering information, assessing failure to appear, supervising defendants, and notifying the court of release conditions.

  • Programs now focus on special needs like mental illness and domestic violence.

Charging the Defendant
  • Charging a defendant is a critical stage based on case facts and evidence strength.

The Indictment Process: The Grand Jury
  • Grand jury was created as a check against prosecution (Magna Carta, 1215).

  • Fifth Amendment: Requires indictment for the capital offenses.

  • Power to act as an independent agency that examines a possibility of criminal activity.

    • Community's conscience determining if state accusations justify trial.

  • The grand jury can rely on the testimony of witnesses and decide whether probably cause exists.

    • If so, it affirms the indictment; otherwise, it passes a "no bill."

    • Made of 16-23 individuals.

Reforming the Grand Jury?

  • United States v. Williams (1992): No supervisory power in federal court requires presentment to a grand jury of evidence that clears a defendant.

The Information Process: The Preliminary Hearing
  • Used as an alternative to a grand jury in about half the states.

  • Establishes sufficient probable cause for a trial.

  • Involves prosecuting attorney, defendant, and defense counsel.

  • The defense counsel has the right to cross examine witnesses and to challenge the prosecutor's evidence.

  • If sufficient cause is found, the case is bound over for trial.

Arraignment
  • Takes place after indictment or information is filed.

  • Judge informs the defendant of the charges (Sixth Amendment) and ensures they are understood.

  • A trial date is set if the plea is not guilty by reason of insanity.

  • If the defendant pleads guilty or nolo contendere, a sentencing date is arranged.

The Plea
  • A defendant will enter a plea on three different ways

Guilty
  • More than 90% of defendants plead guilty prior to the trial stage.

  • Functions as an admission of guilt.

    • A surrender of trial rights.

  • Must be understood and valid.

Not Guilty
  • Orally stated by the defendant's council, or entered by the court when there is mute.

Nolo Contendere
  • Basically a plea of guilty but cannot be held as such in other proceedings.

    • Accepted at the discretion of the trial court.

Plea Bargaining
  • Exchange of concessions for guilty pleas.

  • Reasons can include reducing the charges, promising recommendations for bail, and dispensing punishment fairly.

Pros and Cons for Plea Bargaining
  • Pros: Reduces costs, improves court efficiency, allows prosecution to focus on serious cases, and offers defendants leniency.

  • Cons: Encourages waiving constitutional rights, may lead to innocent convictions, circumvents the law, and may be influenced by race.

The Problem of False Confessions
  • Some defendants plead guilty to crimes they didn't commit due to duress, coercion, intoxication, or diminished capacity.

Legal Issues in Plea Bargaining
  • Defendants are entitled to effective and honest assistance to protect from external pressure.

The Role of the Prosecutor in Plea Bargaining
  • Prosecutors have broad discretion in deciding what cases to charge.

The Role of the Defense Counsel in Plea Bargaining
  • Defense counsel must advise the defendant and negotiate effectively.

The Role of the Judge in Plea Bargaining
  • The judge's proper role is challenging; ABA is against it, as it may impede a fair/voluntary determination since Judge's role is limited to approval or disapprovals

The Victim and Plea Bargaining
  • Victim involvement is limited before pretrial.

Plea-Bargaining Reform
  • Aims to enhance fairness by ensuring rights are understood, counsel is present, defense is openly discussed, and judicial supervision is properly applied.