knowt logo

top hat chapter 3

1. representing word structures

  • have been used to seperate morphemes in linear fashion

  • morphological trees can represent the internal structure of words

→ known was word trees

  • ex. the word joblessness in word tree

  • review

    • one morpheme word → free morphemes

    • simple words are free morphemes that have a syntactic catergory

    • simple words internal structure is usually not drawn because it is only one word

    • allomorph: multiple representations of a morpheme

  • two facts about affixation

    • affixes/bound morphemes attach to specfic bases

    → ex. -able prefers attaching to verbs, -ish prefers nouns and some adjectives

    • derivational affixes change the syntactic catrgory they attach to

    → ex. words that end with -able are adjectives, words that end with -ment or -ness are nouns

  • need to identify root of complex word

  • once root is found, find all attaching affixes to it

  • when multiple affixes, the closest affix is attached first

  • derivational affix attach to words first

  • derivational affixes: change meaning of words

  • inflectional affixes attach last

  • ex. two trees for reuseable since reuse and usable are both words

  • ex. -re attaches first since it can only attach to verbs and then -able

→ -able first makes it an adjective

  • ex. for discontinuation

    • -dis first because it cannot attach to nouns (continuation)

    • -tion after

  • words with more then one affix have a hierarchical structure

→ structure reflects in order of attachment

  • english words come from latin and greek that can be broken down into smaller units of words

→ english speakers cannot analyze those → consider them as free morphemes

1.1 morphological ambiguity

  • words with one meaning allows us to derive 1 morphological tree

  • words with many meanings are structurally ambiguous words

  • structurally ambigous words can have more then 1 morphological tree

  • ex. untieable

    • can put -un and then -able

    • can put -able then -un

    • different meanings: able to untie, unable to tie

2. derivation: word formation processes

  • affixation: affix(es) attach to form new words/grammatical function

  • derivational affixation is one of the most common word formation processes in english and other languages

  • english has derivational suffixation and prefixation

  • adding a derivational affix can create words with new meanings/syntactic catergories

  • -un → negated meaning

  • derivational affixation is not the only way to make new words

2.1 compounding

  • compounding: join two words/units into a new word

→ very common process to make new words

  • usually two free morphemes make a compound

→ ex. greenhouse and green house have different meanings in a sentence

→ green is an adjective, greenhouse is a noun

  • resulting compounds are in the following syntactic categories:

    • noun → ex. parking ticket, force-feed

    • adjective → ex. carsick

    • adverb → downward

    • verb

  • compound propositions exist → ex. without

  • prepositions a part of other compounds → ex. outsource (proposition + verb)

  • most right word defines syntactic category of entire compound

→ ex. parking ticket is a noun bec ticket is a noun

  • head: element that defines syntactic category of a compound

  • english is a right headed language

  • other languages can be left headed

→ where the left most element determines the compounds syntactic category

  • compounds can be formed by multiple morphemes

→ not limited to two

  • affixation is not compounds

  • compounding helps expand dictionaries

2.1.1 properties of compounds

  • compounds can be written with:

    • hyphen (-)

    • single word

    • separate words

  • pronunciation of compounds is different from separate words

  • emphasis/loudness (defined as stress) falls on first element in a compound

→ this falls on the second element in a non compound combination of words

ex. greenhouse → stress on green (compound)

green house → stress on house (non-compound)

2.1.2 endocentric and exocentric compounds

  • compounds are classified by conveyed meaning

  • endocentric compounds: meaning based on head of compound (head in english is the right element!!)

→ predictable meanings

→ ex. earthworm (type of worm), self-care (type of care)

  • exocentric compounds: meaning not from the head of compound

→ not directly derived from head/not obvious or predictable

2.2 reduplication

  • reduplication is a formation process that denotes grammatical/semantic contrast

  • reduplication: doubling a free morpheme or a part of it to make new words

  • semantic: logic of languages

  • two types of reduplication:

    • partial reduplication: repeating a part of the morphological base (sound or syllable)

    • total/full reduplication: copying entire morpheme to change meaning

  • english does not use reduplication to make new words

  • can indicate intensity/focus of the object in a sentence

  • some languages use reduplication to make new words

  • some languages use reduplication to show grammatical information

→ ex. tagalog and Indonesian

2.3 zero derivation

  • zero derivation/conversion: changes a words syntactic category without changing its form

→ ex. google as a verb and noun

  • does not involve affixation

  • conversions change stress

2.4 clipping

  • clipping: deletes one or more syllables to a multisyllabic word

→ ex. rob, kat, liz

  • usually the first syllable is chosen to be the new shortened form (ex. rob, kat, liz)

→ not always though (ex. flu ← influenza, mum ← chrysanthemum)

  • other languages that are not english use clipping as well

→ ex. german

2.5 blending

  • blending/portmanteau: makes new words from parts of words

→ usually first part of the first word, final part from another word

  • ex. include:

    • brunch (breakfast and lunch)

    • motel (motor and hotel)

    • smog (smoke and fog)

    • sponcon (sponsored and content)

2.6 backformation

  • backformation: creating new lexical entries from removing supposed morphemes from a word

→ supposed as in it is not actually a morpheme removed

→ removes what looks like a morpheme but actually is not one

  • cannot tell what words are backformed until researched

  • ex. donate came from removing -ion from donation

  • words that end with -er or -or are at risk for backformation

→ ex. editor → edit

2.7 acronyms and abbreviations

  • acronyms: take first letters of a word and pronouncing them as a word

→ words made by abbreviations

  • ex.

    • NASA

    • BOGO

  • acronyms are so engrained to the point where speakers sometimes forget/don’t know what they stand for

→ ex. laser, radar, scuba

  • initialisms/abbreviations: words from a initial group of letters

  • they contrast acronyms as they are pronounced by letters instead of as a word

2.8 coinage

  • coinage: creating words from scratch

→ words from non-existing things

  • coinings/new words are applied to new concepts/inventions that do not already exist

  • coinage creates product and company names

  • ex.

    • kleenex

    • kodak

    • teflon

2.9 eponymy

  • eponyms: words created from human names

  • meanings of eponyms are based off of person they are named after

  • ex. morse code → named after samuel morse for telegraphs

  • many eponyms are unambiguously name related

  • some eponyms are less obvious

3. inflectional processes

3.1. internal change

  • internal change is related to inflection

  • internal change is when one non-morphemic element is substituted for another to make grammatical changes

→ ex. goose → geese, foot → feet display internal change of vowels

  • change causes singular-plural distinction

  • ablaut: change in vowel structure instead of affixation

→ marks grammatical contrasts

  • vowels of a verb is replaced by another vowel for grammatical information purposes in some cases

ex. swim → swam

drink → drank

→ changes show past tense

geese → goose

→ changes in plural case

3.2 suppletion

  • suppletion: the process of one morpheme replaced by another phonologically unrelated morpheme

→ when one form of a word are not phonologically related

  • phonologically: relation to sound of a word (reminder)

  • some verbs are unrelated to their infinitival forms

→ infinitival forms are to-infitinvtive and infintitive-without-to

  • ex. go → went

  • be → was → is → am

  • suppletion occurs in verbs and adjectives

  • these irregularities come from historic developments

JH

top hat chapter 3

1. representing word structures

  • have been used to seperate morphemes in linear fashion

  • morphological trees can represent the internal structure of words

→ known was word trees

  • ex. the word joblessness in word tree

  • review

    • one morpheme word → free morphemes

    • simple words are free morphemes that have a syntactic catergory

    • simple words internal structure is usually not drawn because it is only one word

    • allomorph: multiple representations of a morpheme

  • two facts about affixation

    • affixes/bound morphemes attach to specfic bases

    → ex. -able prefers attaching to verbs, -ish prefers nouns and some adjectives

    • derivational affixes change the syntactic catrgory they attach to

    → ex. words that end with -able are adjectives, words that end with -ment or -ness are nouns

  • need to identify root of complex word

  • once root is found, find all attaching affixes to it

  • when multiple affixes, the closest affix is attached first

  • derivational affix attach to words first

  • derivational affixes: change meaning of words

  • inflectional affixes attach last

  • ex. two trees for reuseable since reuse and usable are both words

  • ex. -re attaches first since it can only attach to verbs and then -able

→ -able first makes it an adjective

  • ex. for discontinuation

    • -dis first because it cannot attach to nouns (continuation)

    • -tion after

  • words with more then one affix have a hierarchical structure

→ structure reflects in order of attachment

  • english words come from latin and greek that can be broken down into smaller units of words

→ english speakers cannot analyze those → consider them as free morphemes

1.1 morphological ambiguity

  • words with one meaning allows us to derive 1 morphological tree

  • words with many meanings are structurally ambiguous words

  • structurally ambigous words can have more then 1 morphological tree

  • ex. untieable

    • can put -un and then -able

    • can put -able then -un

    • different meanings: able to untie, unable to tie

2. derivation: word formation processes

  • affixation: affix(es) attach to form new words/grammatical function

  • derivational affixation is one of the most common word formation processes in english and other languages

  • english has derivational suffixation and prefixation

  • adding a derivational affix can create words with new meanings/syntactic catergories

  • -un → negated meaning

  • derivational affixation is not the only way to make new words

2.1 compounding

  • compounding: join two words/units into a new word

→ very common process to make new words

  • usually two free morphemes make a compound

→ ex. greenhouse and green house have different meanings in a sentence

→ green is an adjective, greenhouse is a noun

  • resulting compounds are in the following syntactic categories:

    • noun → ex. parking ticket, force-feed

    • adjective → ex. carsick

    • adverb → downward

    • verb

  • compound propositions exist → ex. without

  • prepositions a part of other compounds → ex. outsource (proposition + verb)

  • most right word defines syntactic category of entire compound

→ ex. parking ticket is a noun bec ticket is a noun

  • head: element that defines syntactic category of a compound

  • english is a right headed language

  • other languages can be left headed

→ where the left most element determines the compounds syntactic category

  • compounds can be formed by multiple morphemes

→ not limited to two

  • affixation is not compounds

  • compounding helps expand dictionaries

2.1.1 properties of compounds

  • compounds can be written with:

    • hyphen (-)

    • single word

    • separate words

  • pronunciation of compounds is different from separate words

  • emphasis/loudness (defined as stress) falls on first element in a compound

→ this falls on the second element in a non compound combination of words

ex. greenhouse → stress on green (compound)

green house → stress on house (non-compound)

2.1.2 endocentric and exocentric compounds

  • compounds are classified by conveyed meaning

  • endocentric compounds: meaning based on head of compound (head in english is the right element!!)

→ predictable meanings

→ ex. earthworm (type of worm), self-care (type of care)

  • exocentric compounds: meaning not from the head of compound

→ not directly derived from head/not obvious or predictable

2.2 reduplication

  • reduplication is a formation process that denotes grammatical/semantic contrast

  • reduplication: doubling a free morpheme or a part of it to make new words

  • semantic: logic of languages

  • two types of reduplication:

    • partial reduplication: repeating a part of the morphological base (sound or syllable)

    • total/full reduplication: copying entire morpheme to change meaning

  • english does not use reduplication to make new words

  • can indicate intensity/focus of the object in a sentence

  • some languages use reduplication to make new words

  • some languages use reduplication to show grammatical information

→ ex. tagalog and Indonesian

2.3 zero derivation

  • zero derivation/conversion: changes a words syntactic category without changing its form

→ ex. google as a verb and noun

  • does not involve affixation

  • conversions change stress

2.4 clipping

  • clipping: deletes one or more syllables to a multisyllabic word

→ ex. rob, kat, liz

  • usually the first syllable is chosen to be the new shortened form (ex. rob, kat, liz)

→ not always though (ex. flu ← influenza, mum ← chrysanthemum)

  • other languages that are not english use clipping as well

→ ex. german

2.5 blending

  • blending/portmanteau: makes new words from parts of words

→ usually first part of the first word, final part from another word

  • ex. include:

    • brunch (breakfast and lunch)

    • motel (motor and hotel)

    • smog (smoke and fog)

    • sponcon (sponsored and content)

2.6 backformation

  • backformation: creating new lexical entries from removing supposed morphemes from a word

→ supposed as in it is not actually a morpheme removed

→ removes what looks like a morpheme but actually is not one

  • cannot tell what words are backformed until researched

  • ex. donate came from removing -ion from donation

  • words that end with -er or -or are at risk for backformation

→ ex. editor → edit

2.7 acronyms and abbreviations

  • acronyms: take first letters of a word and pronouncing them as a word

→ words made by abbreviations

  • ex.

    • NASA

    • BOGO

  • acronyms are so engrained to the point where speakers sometimes forget/don’t know what they stand for

→ ex. laser, radar, scuba

  • initialisms/abbreviations: words from a initial group of letters

  • they contrast acronyms as they are pronounced by letters instead of as a word

2.8 coinage

  • coinage: creating words from scratch

→ words from non-existing things

  • coinings/new words are applied to new concepts/inventions that do not already exist

  • coinage creates product and company names

  • ex.

    • kleenex

    • kodak

    • teflon

2.9 eponymy

  • eponyms: words created from human names

  • meanings of eponyms are based off of person they are named after

  • ex. morse code → named after samuel morse for telegraphs

  • many eponyms are unambiguously name related

  • some eponyms are less obvious

3. inflectional processes

3.1. internal change

  • internal change is related to inflection

  • internal change is when one non-morphemic element is substituted for another to make grammatical changes

→ ex. goose → geese, foot → feet display internal change of vowels

  • change causes singular-plural distinction

  • ablaut: change in vowel structure instead of affixation

→ marks grammatical contrasts

  • vowels of a verb is replaced by another vowel for grammatical information purposes in some cases

ex. swim → swam

drink → drank

→ changes show past tense

geese → goose

→ changes in plural case

3.2 suppletion

  • suppletion: the process of one morpheme replaced by another phonologically unrelated morpheme

→ when one form of a word are not phonologically related

  • phonologically: relation to sound of a word (reminder)

  • some verbs are unrelated to their infinitival forms

→ infinitival forms are to-infitinvtive and infintitive-without-to

  • ex. go → went

  • be → was → is → am

  • suppletion occurs in verbs and adjectives

  • these irregularities come from historic developments

robot