top hat chapter 3
have been used to seperate morphemes in linear fashion
morphological trees can represent the internal structure of words
→ known was word trees
ex. the word joblessness in word tree
review
one morpheme word → free morphemes
simple words are free morphemes that have a syntactic catergory
simple words internal structure is usually not drawn because it is only one word
allomorph: multiple representations of a morpheme
two facts about affixation
affixes/bound morphemes attach to specfic bases
→ ex. -able prefers attaching to verbs, -ish prefers nouns and some adjectives
derivational affixes change the syntactic catrgory they attach to
→ ex. words that end with -able are adjectives, words that end with -ment or -ness are nouns
need to identify root of complex word
once root is found, find all attaching affixes to it
when multiple affixes, the closest affix is attached first
derivational affix attach to words first
derivational affixes: change meaning of words
inflectional affixes attach last
ex. two trees for reuseable since reuse and usable are both words
ex. -re attaches first since it can only attach to verbs and then -able
→ -able first makes it an adjective
ex. for discontinuation
-dis first because it cannot attach to nouns (continuation)
-tion after
words with more then one affix have a hierarchical structure
→ structure reflects in order of attachment
english words come from latin and greek that can be broken down into smaller units of words
→ english speakers cannot analyze those → consider them as free morphemes
words with one meaning allows us to derive 1 morphological tree
words with many meanings are structurally ambiguous words
structurally ambigous words can have more then 1 morphological tree
ex. untieable
can put -un and then -able
can put -able then -un
different meanings: able to untie, unable to tie
affixation: affix(es) attach to form new words/grammatical function
derivational affixation is one of the most common word formation processes in english and other languages
english has derivational suffixation and prefixation
adding a derivational affix can create words with new meanings/syntactic catergories
-un → negated meaning
derivational affixation is not the only way to make new words
compounding: join two words/units into a new word
→ very common process to make new words
usually two free morphemes make a compound
→ ex. greenhouse and green house have different meanings in a sentence
→ green is an adjective, greenhouse is a noun
resulting compounds are in the following syntactic categories:
noun → ex. parking ticket, force-feed
adjective → ex. carsick
adverb → downward
verb
compound propositions exist → ex. without
prepositions a part of other compounds → ex. outsource (proposition + verb)
most right word defines syntactic category of entire compound
→ ex. parking ticket is a noun bec ticket is a noun
head: element that defines syntactic category of a compound
english is a right headed language
other languages can be left headed
→ where the left most element determines the compounds syntactic category
compounds can be formed by multiple morphemes
→ not limited to two
affixation is not compounds
compounding helps expand dictionaries
compounds can be written with:
hyphen (-)
single word
separate words
pronunciation of compounds is different from separate words
emphasis/loudness (defined as stress) falls on first element in a compound
→ this falls on the second element in a non compound combination of words
ex. greenhouse → stress on green (compound)
green house → stress on house (non-compound)
compounds are classified by conveyed meaning
endocentric compounds: meaning based on head of compound (head in english is the right element!!)
→ predictable meanings
→ ex. earthworm (type of worm), self-care (type of care)
exocentric compounds: meaning not from the head of compound
→ not directly derived from head/not obvious or predictable
reduplication is a formation process that denotes grammatical/semantic contrast
reduplication: doubling a free morpheme or a part of it to make new words
semantic: logic of languages
two types of reduplication:
partial reduplication: repeating a part of the morphological base (sound or syllable)
total/full reduplication: copying entire morpheme to change meaning
english does not use reduplication to make new words
can indicate intensity/focus of the object in a sentence
some languages use reduplication to make new words
some languages use reduplication to show grammatical information
→ ex. tagalog and Indonesian
zero derivation/conversion: changes a words syntactic category without changing its form
→ ex. google as a verb and noun
does not involve affixation
conversions change stress
clipping: deletes one or more syllables to a multisyllabic word
→ ex. rob, kat, liz
usually the first syllable is chosen to be the new shortened form (ex. rob, kat, liz)
→ not always though (ex. flu ← influenza, mum ← chrysanthemum)
other languages that are not english use clipping as well
→ ex. german
blending/portmanteau: makes new words from parts of words
→ usually first part of the first word, final part from another word
ex. include:
brunch (breakfast and lunch)
motel (motor and hotel)
smog (smoke and fog)
sponcon (sponsored and content)
backformation: creating new lexical entries from removing supposed morphemes from a word
→ supposed as in it is not actually a morpheme removed
→ removes what looks like a morpheme but actually is not one
cannot tell what words are backformed until researched
ex. donate came from removing -ion from donation
words that end with -er or -or are at risk for backformation
→ ex. editor → edit
acronyms: take first letters of a word and pronouncing them as a word
→ words made by abbreviations
ex.
NASA
BOGO
acronyms are so engrained to the point where speakers sometimes forget/don’t know what they stand for
→ ex. laser, radar, scuba
initialisms/abbreviations: words from a initial group of letters
they contrast acronyms as they are pronounced by letters instead of as a word
coinage: creating words from scratch
→ words from non-existing things
coinings/new words are applied to new concepts/inventions that do not already exist
coinage creates product and company names
ex.
kleenex
kodak
teflon
eponyms: words created from human names
meanings of eponyms are based off of person they are named after
ex. morse code → named after samuel morse for telegraphs
many eponyms are unambiguously name related
some eponyms are less obvious
internal change is related to inflection
internal change is when one non-morphemic element is substituted for another to make grammatical changes
→ ex. goose → geese, foot → feet display internal change of vowels
change causes singular-plural distinction
ablaut: change in vowel structure instead of affixation
→ marks grammatical contrasts
vowels of a verb is replaced by another vowel for grammatical information purposes in some cases
ex. swim → swam
drink → drank
→ changes show past tense
geese → goose
→ changes in plural case
suppletion: the process of one morpheme replaced by another phonologically unrelated morpheme
→ when one form of a word are not phonologically related
phonologically: relation to sound of a word (reminder)
some verbs are unrelated to their infinitival forms
→ infinitival forms are to-infitinvtive and infintitive-without-to
ex. go → went
be → was → is → am
suppletion occurs in verbs and adjectives
these irregularities come from historic developments
have been used to seperate morphemes in linear fashion
morphological trees can represent the internal structure of words
→ known was word trees
ex. the word joblessness in word tree
review
one morpheme word → free morphemes
simple words are free morphemes that have a syntactic catergory
simple words internal structure is usually not drawn because it is only one word
allomorph: multiple representations of a morpheme
two facts about affixation
affixes/bound morphemes attach to specfic bases
→ ex. -able prefers attaching to verbs, -ish prefers nouns and some adjectives
derivational affixes change the syntactic catrgory they attach to
→ ex. words that end with -able are adjectives, words that end with -ment or -ness are nouns
need to identify root of complex word
once root is found, find all attaching affixes to it
when multiple affixes, the closest affix is attached first
derivational affix attach to words first
derivational affixes: change meaning of words
inflectional affixes attach last
ex. two trees for reuseable since reuse and usable are both words
ex. -re attaches first since it can only attach to verbs and then -able
→ -able first makes it an adjective
ex. for discontinuation
-dis first because it cannot attach to nouns (continuation)
-tion after
words with more then one affix have a hierarchical structure
→ structure reflects in order of attachment
english words come from latin and greek that can be broken down into smaller units of words
→ english speakers cannot analyze those → consider them as free morphemes
words with one meaning allows us to derive 1 morphological tree
words with many meanings are structurally ambiguous words
structurally ambigous words can have more then 1 morphological tree
ex. untieable
can put -un and then -able
can put -able then -un
different meanings: able to untie, unable to tie
affixation: affix(es) attach to form new words/grammatical function
derivational affixation is one of the most common word formation processes in english and other languages
english has derivational suffixation and prefixation
adding a derivational affix can create words with new meanings/syntactic catergories
-un → negated meaning
derivational affixation is not the only way to make new words
compounding: join two words/units into a new word
→ very common process to make new words
usually two free morphemes make a compound
→ ex. greenhouse and green house have different meanings in a sentence
→ green is an adjective, greenhouse is a noun
resulting compounds are in the following syntactic categories:
noun → ex. parking ticket, force-feed
adjective → ex. carsick
adverb → downward
verb
compound propositions exist → ex. without
prepositions a part of other compounds → ex. outsource (proposition + verb)
most right word defines syntactic category of entire compound
→ ex. parking ticket is a noun bec ticket is a noun
head: element that defines syntactic category of a compound
english is a right headed language
other languages can be left headed
→ where the left most element determines the compounds syntactic category
compounds can be formed by multiple morphemes
→ not limited to two
affixation is not compounds
compounding helps expand dictionaries
compounds can be written with:
hyphen (-)
single word
separate words
pronunciation of compounds is different from separate words
emphasis/loudness (defined as stress) falls on first element in a compound
→ this falls on the second element in a non compound combination of words
ex. greenhouse → stress on green (compound)
green house → stress on house (non-compound)
compounds are classified by conveyed meaning
endocentric compounds: meaning based on head of compound (head in english is the right element!!)
→ predictable meanings
→ ex. earthworm (type of worm), self-care (type of care)
exocentric compounds: meaning not from the head of compound
→ not directly derived from head/not obvious or predictable
reduplication is a formation process that denotes grammatical/semantic contrast
reduplication: doubling a free morpheme or a part of it to make new words
semantic: logic of languages
two types of reduplication:
partial reduplication: repeating a part of the morphological base (sound or syllable)
total/full reduplication: copying entire morpheme to change meaning
english does not use reduplication to make new words
can indicate intensity/focus of the object in a sentence
some languages use reduplication to make new words
some languages use reduplication to show grammatical information
→ ex. tagalog and Indonesian
zero derivation/conversion: changes a words syntactic category without changing its form
→ ex. google as a verb and noun
does not involve affixation
conversions change stress
clipping: deletes one or more syllables to a multisyllabic word
→ ex. rob, kat, liz
usually the first syllable is chosen to be the new shortened form (ex. rob, kat, liz)
→ not always though (ex. flu ← influenza, mum ← chrysanthemum)
other languages that are not english use clipping as well
→ ex. german
blending/portmanteau: makes new words from parts of words
→ usually first part of the first word, final part from another word
ex. include:
brunch (breakfast and lunch)
motel (motor and hotel)
smog (smoke and fog)
sponcon (sponsored and content)
backformation: creating new lexical entries from removing supposed morphemes from a word
→ supposed as in it is not actually a morpheme removed
→ removes what looks like a morpheme but actually is not one
cannot tell what words are backformed until researched
ex. donate came from removing -ion from donation
words that end with -er or -or are at risk for backformation
→ ex. editor → edit
acronyms: take first letters of a word and pronouncing them as a word
→ words made by abbreviations
ex.
NASA
BOGO
acronyms are so engrained to the point where speakers sometimes forget/don’t know what they stand for
→ ex. laser, radar, scuba
initialisms/abbreviations: words from a initial group of letters
they contrast acronyms as they are pronounced by letters instead of as a word
coinage: creating words from scratch
→ words from non-existing things
coinings/new words are applied to new concepts/inventions that do not already exist
coinage creates product and company names
ex.
kleenex
kodak
teflon
eponyms: words created from human names
meanings of eponyms are based off of person they are named after
ex. morse code → named after samuel morse for telegraphs
many eponyms are unambiguously name related
some eponyms are less obvious
internal change is related to inflection
internal change is when one non-morphemic element is substituted for another to make grammatical changes
→ ex. goose → geese, foot → feet display internal change of vowels
change causes singular-plural distinction
ablaut: change in vowel structure instead of affixation
→ marks grammatical contrasts
vowels of a verb is replaced by another vowel for grammatical information purposes in some cases
ex. swim → swam
drink → drank
→ changes show past tense
geese → goose
→ changes in plural case
suppletion: the process of one morpheme replaced by another phonologically unrelated morpheme
→ when one form of a word are not phonologically related
phonologically: relation to sound of a word (reminder)
some verbs are unrelated to their infinitival forms
→ infinitival forms are to-infitinvtive and infintitive-without-to
ex. go → went
be → was → is → am
suppletion occurs in verbs and adjectives
these irregularities come from historic developments