Date Downloaded: Wed Jan 1, 2025
Source: Content Downloaded from HeinOnline
Citation Formats: Provided examples for various citation styles (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.) for Roscoe Pound's work.
The distinction between written law and practical application of law.
Example from literature illustrating the difference in practices due to adherence to tradition over practicality.
Tom requests case-knives for a task better suited for pickaxes, indicating adherence to tradition despite inefficiency.
The eventual realization that using the proper tools (pickaxe) is more effective illustrates the conflict between tradition and practicality in legal practice.
Early legal systems emphasized continuity of family and household.
Example: Adoption was used to address failure of lineages regarding household worship.
Roman law developed methods to handle property distribution without violating ancient doctrines.
Kings extended peace and legality through public adoption of individuals into their households.
Evolution of legal concepts to adapt to practical realities rather than strict adherence to forms.
Courts historically have upheld outdated practices versus progressive social and legal changes.
Constitutionality: Courts often contradict theoretical guarantees of constitutional protections in favor of practical judgments.
Example: New York court rulings on hours of labor regulation; revealed inconsistencies between state and supreme courts.
Judicial decisions increasingly reflect social policy rather than strict legal doctrines.
Judicial power: Courts adapt laws in practice that do not align with written statutes, particularly in fields such as labor and property law.
The "third degree" in police investigations reflects a gap between legal protections and realities of criminal justice.
Legal rules intended to protect individuals often fail in practice, especially for marginalized populations.
Jury Lawlessness: Juries exercising discretion often modify strict applications of the law, indicating the influence of public opinion on legal outcomes.
American legal doctrine struggles with resolving individual cases while adhering to rigid legislative structures.
Over-reliance on written law leads to inefficiency in actual legal application.
Administrative issues in enforcing law must be addressed to reconcile law in books with law in action.
Legal professionals must remain dynamic, ensuring the law evolves to reflect contemporary social values and needs, rather than relying solely on ancient or rigid doctrines.
The call for a more flexible, responsive legal system that aligns with the realities of modern life.