The HBR Special Issue on how Apple is organized for innovation explores the company's unique approach to organizational structure and leadership that has significantly contributed to its success in rapid technological change and innovation. The article illustrates how this model allows Apple to remain agile and innovative in a fast-paced digital environment.
Apple, known for its innovations, grew from 8,000 employees and $7 billion in revenue in 1997 to 137,000 employees and $260 billion in revenue by 2019.
When Steve Jobs returned to Apple, he restructured the company from a decentralized business unit model to a functional structure with a single profit and loss (P&L) statement.
Unlike traditional companies where general managers run various business units, Apple’s senior vice presidents manage specific functions such as design, engineering, and marketing.
The functional structure emphasizes collaboration among experts across different domains, ensuring that decision-making aligns with the subject matter expertise.
This organization model has helped Apple innovate continually, particularly in product categories like the iPhone, showcasing a relentless commitment to improving features, notably the iPhone camera.
Continuous innovation is critical for Apple, which is reflected in the evolution of the iPhone camera with numerous updates over the years (e.g., portrait mode, optical image stabilization).
The success of product features often hinges on calculated risks taken by teams led by knowledgeable experts rather than general managers focused primarily on profit.
Apple relies on experts who have deep knowledge and experience, allowing them to make informed decisions swiftly in an environment where technological trends can shift rapidly.
Leadership at Apple is characterized by individuals who possess significant expertise, allowing them to engage thoughtfully in high-level debates and product discussions, contrasted with hires made solely for managerial capability.
Deep Expertise: Leaders are expected to have a strong understanding of their domain, leading to informed, detail-oriented decision-making.
Immersion in Details: There is an imperative for leaders to know critical details, allowing for effective and quick cross-functional team communication.
Collaborative Debate: Open discussion is encouraged among different functions where leaders critically engage with other areas, leading to democracy in the decision-making process.
The development of features like portrait mode for the iPhone's camera required collaboration among numerous specialized teams, showcasing the model of experts leading experts.
Challenges in achieving engineering standards emphasize the need for team collaboration and shared accountability across functions, fostering a results-oriented culture.
As Apple has grown, its leadership model has adapted to the increased complexity of operations, moving to a model that focuses on discretionary leadership where leaders allocate their time efficiently across various responsibilities.
Apple managers now balance between detailed oversight and guiding teams while ensuring expertise is not diluted as responsibilities grow.
Managing a larger and more diverse team necessitates a nuanced approach to leadership that differentiates between responsibilities requiring detailed attention and those that can be delegated.
Leaders are tasked with deciding where to apply their expertise as Apple's functional organization continues to evolve and expand alongside its growth in revenue and product offerings.
Apple exemplifies that a functional organization tool, while unconventional for large companies, can yield extraordinary results in innovation and adaptability. The company’s success illustrates a model where deep expertise, collaborative leadership, and strategic decision-making are core tenets of operational success, allowing it to thrive in a rapidly changing landscape.