Limitations of Social Change
Protests often have low participation rates, and demands may be modest.
Significant change is rare and typically slow, though some exceptions exist.
The idea of social inertia and tradition is supported by conservatives like Edmund Burke, who argue for slow change in political and social realms.
Understanding Rare Events
Elementary social movements rarely lead to transformative changes.
Mention of Stanley Lieberman, whose work on social processes, likens social change to rare events in sports.
Key insight: Understanding why events do not happen is as crucial as why they do occur.
Collective Action Problems
Free Rider Problem: Individuals refrain from taking action against injustice, waiting for others to act.
Threshold Problem: Desire to act is present, but individuals hesitate to lead, waiting for a critical mass that never materializes.
Theories of Resistance to Inequality
Pierre Bourdieu: Argues social inequalities are perceived as natural, leading to resignation among the affected.
Social structures are often viewed through personal dispositions, such as gender roles or class preferences.
Consent and Social Structures
Antonio Gramsci: Sees consent as an active investment in a system that perpetuates inequality (e.g., the belief in meritocracy).
The notion that socioeconomic inequalities go unchallenged because people believe in potential upward mobility.
Public vs. Hidden Transcripts
James Scott's Concept: The public transcript reflects interactions between dominant and subordinate classes, often obscuring true power dynamics.
Hidden transcripts include non-observed interactions and dissent, showcasing societal struggles beneath the surface.
The importance of recognizing nuances in resistance that do not appear as overt challenges to power.
Artifacts and Social Life
Bruno Latour's Missing Masses: Argues sociological interpretations must consider material objects contributing to social stability.
Inanimate objects enforce social norms and behaviors (e.g., automatic doors, seat belts).
Human interaction with technology shapes behaviors, lending greater weight to nonhuman actors in social studies.
Critical Reflection on Human-Nonhuman Interaction
Technology seen as extensions of human action, facilitating tasks traditionally done by people.
The evolution of technology, from simple tools to advanced AI, emphasizes how human relationships with tools influence behavior and society.
Implications of AI and Social Interaction
Raises questions on the potential of AI to replicate or even alter human interactions and emotional responses.
Good practices in interaction with AI (e.g., politeness) could reflect on broader societal engagements.
Recent surveys indicate social behaviors may be changing with increased interactions with AI systems.
Key Takeaways
Understanding social movement dynamics involves recognizing why change is often minimal rather than significant.
The interplay of material conditions, societal consent, and the role of nonhuman actors shapes our social reality and its potential for change.
The evolving nature of technology and AI technologies: potential impacts on the way we interact socially, underscoring a need to adapt to new social norms as technologies change.