Represents combinations of two goods purchasable with:
Given income or budget
Fixed prices of each good
Example: Weekly “FUN” budget of $60.
Night out at club: $20/night.
Club nights (variable) and romantic dates (variable).
Example prices:
Activity 1: Club night at $20
Activity 2: Romantic date at $10
Creative date options include:
Roberto’s Taco: $3.75 x 2 + $2.65 Soda = $10
Bellagio Fountains = $0
Netflix Movie = $0
If streaming a movie costs $10, total price for a Date night may increase to $20.
Student discount at local club lowers price to $15/night.
Utility: Satisfaction from consuming a good or service.
Marginal Utility Analysis: Evaluates consumer decision-making within budget constraints.
Consumers allocate income to maximize well-being.
Identifies optimal point on budget line for maximum utility.
As a product is consumed, additional satisfaction from each unit decreases.
Marginal utility can fall and may become negative.
Graphs demonstrate total utility and marginal utility as consumption increases.
Rule states individuals achieve total satisfaction when marginal utility/$ is equal across goods.
Example analysis for rides at Cedar Point:
Total Utility (TU): compares utility from Top Thrill Dragster and Blue Streak rides.
Decision-making influenced by time and ride preferences.
Difficulty in measuring actual utility received by consumers.
Not all decisions follow strict utility rationality due to behavioral economics.
Sunk Cost Fallacy: Continued investment based on past expenditures; e.g., not dropping a class due to tuition already paid.
Framing Bias: Influence of presentation on decision-making; e.g., sale tactics.
Overconfidence: Misjudgment of personal commitment, e.g., unused gym memberships.
Overvaluing Present vs Future: Preference against long-term benefits, like retirement plans.
Altruism: Generosity in actions, such as tipping beyond service quality.
Scenario analysis to gauge understanding of marginal utility applications and consumer decision factors.