Cloning Notes
Cloning Defined
Cloning is explained through the blueprint metaphor, drawing parallels between various biological entities.
Applications of cloning include:
Plants
Animals
Tissues
Organs
Whole organisms (e.g., animal husbandry)
Current View on Cloning
Regarding ethical perspectives on cloning:
Cloning in humans/persons is viewed as impermissible.
Cloning in non-human animals and plants may be permissible depending on specific circumstances.
Key Concepts Related to Cloning
Genetic Determinism
Definition: The idea that genes determine physical and behavioral traits.
Controversy
This concept is debated extensively in the context of evolutionary psychology and other fields.
Its implications extend to eugenics.
Eugenics
Definition: A set of beliefs and practices aimed at improving the genetic quality of a human population.
Controversy
Historical context of eugenics raises ethical concerns and discussions about implications of genetic intervention.
Comparison is made with animal husbandry practices.
Blank Slatism vs. Biology
The debate of nurture vs. nature involves:
Blank slatism: the belief that individuals are born without built-in mental content.
Biological determinism: the notion that genetics is the primary influence on human behavior.
Landmark Legal Cases
SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) Case
Oliver W. Holmes remarks on the nature of legal responsibility in the context of cloning and genetic intervention.
Normative Theories in Cloning
Kantian Analysis
The analysis revolves around the concepts of ends and means:
Autonomy: Respect for individual agency must be upheld.
Utilitarian Analysis
Focuses on cost-benefit analysis:
Evaluates the outcomes of cloning in terms of overall happiness or welfare.
Issues of moral climate change and the value of human life are central to this discussion.
Cultural and Philosophical References
Influences from Media
Movies, video games, and literature often explore themes of cloning and its ethical implications.
Euthanasia
Related to cloning discussions, particularly within the scope of Natural Law Theory (NLT).
Natural Law Theory (NLT)
Definition: A philosophy asserting that certain rights and values are inherent in human nature.
Distinction between essentialism vs. blank slate
Teleological view: the belief that nature has inherent purposes that dictate moral good or bad.
The discussion includes the distinction between what is “natural” vs. “unnatural” and “normal vs. abnormal.”
Problems with these distinctions arise, informing both religious and secular perspectives of NLT.
Example Discussed: Procreation
Exploration of the purpose or goal of human existence in relation to cloning.
Cloning as Technology
Cloning should be viewed as morally neutral technology.
Arguments presented for cloning include reproductive rights and the concept of meliorism, which focuses on making society better.
Arguments Against Cloning
Repugnance (the “yuck” argument):
Explores the emotional aversion to cloning practices.
Identity Issues:
Cloning may disrupt traditional categories of kinship.
Concerns arise around identity for individuals born through cloning.
Property Arguments:
The view of a child as property raises significant ethical concerns regarding commodification (with Kant's perspective).
Eugenics Argument:
Risks of promoting eugenics in the cloning discourse lead to slippery slope concerns.
Ethical Considerations in Cloning
Can Implies Should?
Discussion on the burden of proof in ethical arguments surrounding cloning.
Burden of proof (BOP) argument forms and their role in determining the default ethical position.
Present Moral Status of Cloning
Cloning Mindless Human Organisms:
Purpose linked to pain, personhood, and moral status.
Rejected property rights analysis as a basis for cloning.
Defense of Cloning:
Cases such as irreversible severe brain damage present arguments for justifiable killing.
Utilitarian analysis emphasizes absence of pain with potential huge benefits from cloning.
Discussions about souls are rejected based on the definitive argument that brain damage outweighs spiritual considerations.
Ockam’s razor and redundancy are mentioned concerning unnecessary complications in arguments.
Cloning Persons
Arguments for Cloning
Knowledge Application:
Knowledge of psychology, child-rearing, and trait production.
Cloning Useful Individuals:
The potential to clone individuals with valuable skills or traits (e.g., scientists).
Health Improvements:
Cloning can lead to improved health outcomes and saving lives, especially in offspring with inherited diseases.
Designer Children:
Cloning raises questions about the ethics of creating 'designer children' to address infertility issues.
Objections to Cloning
Ghoulish Nature:
The ethical argument against cloning based on its perceived grotesqueness is noted, although counter-arguments exist.
Slippery Slope Fallacy:
Concerns about societal implications lead to fears of potential abuses following cloning normalization.
Psychological Distress for Clones:
Potential irrational fears regarding clones’ identities and psychological well-being.
Open Future Argument:
Defined but rejected notion suggesting cloning compromises the openness of future choices for the clone, asserting genetic determinism is false, and valuable information can still be imparted to the clone.