Learning languages can have positive effects, making the researcher personally interested in the topic.
Previous lectures discussed speech perception and categorization.
Speech sounds can be placed on a seven-step continuum where participants may shift their categorization (step 3 to 4).
The categorization curve resembles an S-curve and can be influenced by various factors such as visual cues.
The perceptual categorization is not a direct reflection of acoustic reality; it integrates environmental details.
Recent bilingual studies are happening in Montreal, exploring various sociolinguistic contexts.
Use of EEG and fMRI to study language processing in bilingual individuals.
Researchers trained English and French bilingual infants to recognize minimal pairs spoken by monolingual and bilingual adults.
Results indicate:
Monolingual infants are sensitive to sounds from monolingual speakers.
Bilingual infants respond better to bilingual speakers.
This shows early adaptation of infants to their linguistic environments.
A 2011 study analyzed the vocabulary of five-year-old children with varying language exposure (French and English).
Vocabulary types defined as:
Receptive Vocabulary: Understanding—recognizing objects.
Expressive Vocabulary: Producing—naming the objects.
Findings:
Receptive vocab comparisons show similar results between bilingual and monolingual children.
Expressive vocab shows bilinguals initially lagging but then catching up rapidly as they grow.
fMRI tracks oxygen levels in the brain, highlighting areas active during language tasks.
Example: Mandarin vs. French bilinguals.
Lexical Tone in Mandarin contrasted with no tone function in French.
Study identified three populations:
Fluent Chinese-French bilinguals.
French monolinguals raised in Mandarin environments.
French non-bilinguals.
Results showed the influence of early exposure on language processing areas, even in adults who had no active use of Mandarin.
Eye-tracking technology records eye movement and reading patterns, particularly focused on emotional words.
Findings reveal:
Bilinguals process emotional words slower compared to monolinguals, particularly negative words, although performance on positive emotional words is comparable.
Eye-tracking can also be used to study syntax processing by looking at how individuals react to sentences with grammatical errors.
Bilingualism lacks a universal definition; it can include various competencies such as reading, writing, speaking, and understanding.
Importance of distinguishing between dominant and native languages.
Research considers age of acquisition and frequency of language use in defining bilinguals.
Common methods include self-rated assessments and structured tasks.
Self-rating may present biases due to humility or misjudgment of language ability.
Task-based measures could include:
Lexical Decision Tasks: Participants identify real vs. fake words to assess vocabulary size.
Natural Speech Samples: Native speakers rate the fluency and skill of a second language speaker.
Studies indicate bilingualism correlates with delayed onset of dementia.
Despite similar brain deterioration, bilinguals demonstrate better cognitive functioning and task performance compared to monolinguals with the same level of decline.
Need to identify methods that effectively categorize bilingualism and consider individual differences in language acquisition and use.
Advanced statistical models may offer better clarity in research studies.
The continuous spectrum approach enables more nuanced understanding of bilingual abilities.