Darwin's Proposal:
Darwin proposed two processes through which evolution occurs:
Natural Selection
Sexual Selection
Definition:
A process through which organisms develop characteristics that enhance their ability to survive.
Process:
Organisms with advantageous characteristics are more likely to survive to reproductive age and pass these traits on to the next generation.
Impact Over Generations:
Over successive generations, survival-enhancing characteristics increase in frequency, becoming common within the species.
Offspring inheriting these traits are also more likely to survive and continue the cycle.
Example:
Preference for sweet, fatty, and salty foods among humans.
Definition:
A process through which organisms develop characteristics that enhance their reproductive success.
Darwin's Observations:
Darwin found phenomena such as a peacock's tail aesthetically displeasing, yet it played a role in sexual selection.
Mechanisms Proposed by Darwin:
Intrasexual Selection (Same-sex competition)
Organisms of the same sex compete for the mating interest of the opposite sex.
Those with traits favorable for winning mating battles are more successful in reproduction.
Example: Aerial hover display of the male bronzed cowbird.
Intersexual Selection (Female/Male choice)
Members of one sex prefer mates with specific, desirable characteristics.
Traits that attract the opposite sex become more common over generations.
Example: The brilliant plumage of the male peacock.
Evolutionary Psychologists' View:
Psychological processes are seen as products of natural and sexual selection; adaptations to ancestral survival and reproductive challenges.
Focus Areas:
A significant emphasis on sex differences in personality, stemming from reproductive capacity and parental investment differences.
Reproductive Capacity:
Males: Can have a high number of offspring (max recorded: 900).
Females: Limited to about 8-12 offspring across their lifespan.
Minimal Parental Investment:
Females invest more significantly in offspring (e.g., pregnancy, lactation).
Males mainly engage in mating.
Hypothesis A:
Differences in reproductive capacity and parental investment lead to sex differences in mate preferences:
Males value physical appearance more.
Females value resource potential more.
Supporting Evidence:
Study showing differences in ratings of desirable traits in prospective mates.
Hypothesis B:
Differences in sexual behavior and willingness to engage in uncommitted sexual contact stem from evolutionary pressures.
Males tend to score higher in sociosexuality than females, being more open to multiple partners.
Research Evidence:
Studies by Clark and Hatfield showcasing response differences in dating and sexual propositions.
Participants indicated desired number of sexual partners over life span, showing significant differences based on gender.
Common Critiques:
Concepts in evolutionary psychology are considered unfalsifiable or controversial.
Criticisms include societal implications such as the Cinderella effect, fears of promoting heteronormative and heterosexist views.
Overall Impact:
Evolutionary theories have greatly influenced psychological theory despite noted criticisms.