Organizations require performance measures for:
Driving strategies and organizational change.
Managing resources.
Operating processes effectively.
Continuously improving.
Data and information:
Support control, diagnosis, and planning.
Benefits of performance measurement:
Improved knowledge of product and service quality.
Worker feedback.
Basis for reward and recognition.
Means of assessing progress.
Reduced costs through better planning.
Four perspectives:
Financial.
Internal.
Customer.
Innovation and learning.
Characteristics:
Contains both leading and lagging measures.
Links them through logical cause-and-effect relationships.
Focuses on five categories of performance results:
Product and process outcomes
Customer-focused outcomes
Workforce-focused outcomes
Leadership and governance outcomes
Financial and market outcomes
Organization should tie specific measures and indicators to factors that make it competitive in its industry.
Providing a perspective of the past, present, and future.
Identifying trends and progress.
Facilitating understanding of cause-and-effect relationships.
Providing direction and support for continuous improvement.
Allowing performance comparison to benchmarks.
Not measuring key characteristics critical to:
Company performance.
Customer behavior.
Taking irrelevant or inappropriate measurements.
Leading organizations use well-defined criteria to select appropriate measures and indicators.
Performance measures and indicators are typically used by senior leaders for high-level performance reviews.
They should be aligned with an organization’s vision and strategy.
Effective performance measures are driven by internal and external factors that shape an organization’s operating environment.
Strategic and process measures should be aligned to drive strategic goals through the organization.
ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) systems provide an infrastructure for managing information across the enterprise.
Examination of facts and data to provide a basis for effective decisions.
Effective analysis capabilities ensure that managers can understand the meaning of data, particularly cause and effect linkages between external lagging results and internal leading indicators.
Information needs to be transformed and integrated into forms that are meaningful to different levels of managers.
Interlinking:
Quantitative modeling of cause-and-effect relationships between external and internal performance measures.
Data mining:
Provides a means of understanding relationships and patterns in data.
Refers to industry averages, competitor performance, world-class benchmarks, or performance measures of other organizations with similar product offerings.
Needed because:
An organization needs to know where it stands relative to competitors and to best practices.
Comparative information and information obtained from benchmarking often provide the impetus for significant (“breakthrough”) improvement or change.
Comparing performance information frequently leads to a better understanding of processes and their performance.
Analysis of data provides the foundation for management review.
Managers review performance results to:
Assess organizational success and performance relative to competitors.
Understand how well progress on strategic objectives and action plans is being achieved.
Identify priorities for improvement and opportunities for innovation for products, services, and processes.
Capturing data only once, and as close to the origin of the data as possible.
Eliminating human error by capturing data electronically where possible.
Using a single database whenever feasible.
Eliminating all unnecessary handling of data by intermediaries, such as data entry clerks.
Placing accountability on the creators of data and information.
Ensuring proper training.
Defining targets and measures of data quality.
Definition:
The accumulated intellectual resources that an organization possesses.
Explicit knowledge:
Information that is stored in documents or other forms of media.
Tacit knowledge:
Information that is formed around intangible factors resulting from an individual’s experience, and is personal and content-specific.
Knowledge management:
The process of identifying, capturing, organizing, and using knowledge assets to create and sustain competitive advantage.
Internal benchmarking:
The ability to identify and transfer best practices within the organization.
Requires:
Identifying and collecting internal knowledge and best practices.
Sharing and understanding those practices.
Adapting and applying them to new situations and bringing them up to best practice performance levels.
Rapid knowledge transfer (RKT):
Involves the discovery, learning, creation and reuse of knowledge that eventually becomes intellectual capital—knowledge that can be converted into value and profits.
A growing reservoir of proven, valuable and profitable best-practice business knowledge is currently available for transfer, and most of it is free.
The worldwide quality and productivity improvement revolution has produced business excellence models that replicate successes, including:
The Baldrige criteria.
The EFQM European Award.
The Shingo Prize for Excellence in Manufacturing.
ISO 9000.
Lean.
Six Sigma.