Multi-store model studies
Glanzer and Cunitz (1966)
Aim: 2 Distinct Storage Mechanisms
Investigated Serial Position Effect
46 Army Enlisted Men - split into different groups
Heard list of words -> Had to repeat them with 0, 10, 30 sec delay
0 second - Immediate Free Recall; 30 seconds - Free Recall after Interference Task
More words at Beginning (primacy) and End (recency) of List recalled in 0 sec group
Interference Task removed recency but not primacy
Primacy and Recency are stored differently - Two Separate Memory Stores
Strength | Weakness |
High Internal Validity
High Reliability
| Low Ecological Validity
Low Mundane Realism
|
Baddeley (1966)
Aim: See if coding in STM & LTM is acoustic or semantic
75 participants - shown 1 of 4 lists
List A - acoustically similar
List B - acoustically dissimilar
List C - semantically similar
List D - semantically dissimilar
Testing STM - Write down sequence immediately in order
Testing LTM - 20 min Interval with Interference Task (prevents rehearsal)
STM - List A = worst
LTM - List C = worst
STM -> Codes Acoustically
LTM -> Codes Semantically
Strengths | Weaknesses |
Highly Reliable
Independent Groups Design
| Low Ecological Validity
Independent Groups Design
|
Sacks - Clive Wearing (2007)
Wearing contracted Herpesviral Encephalitis (Herpes.)
Damaged his hippocampus - Unable to store new memories -> STM to LTM
Anterograde Amnesia - Can't store memories after a trauma
'Wakes up' every 30 seconds (once STM elapses)
Can't remember much from before the virus
Retrograde Amnesia - Can't recall memories that happened before a trauma
Can remember how to play piano, but doesn't remember ever playing it
Remembers having kids, doesn't remember their names
Remembers his love for his wife Deborah
Strengths | Weaknesses |
Case Study
Method Triangulation
| Low Representational Generalisability
|
Supports MSM | Highlighting Weakness of MSM |
|
|