Knowt
COURT CASE: Engel v. Vitale
background
New York state’s Board of Regents wrote a voluntary nondenominational prayer that would be recited by students at the beginning of each school day
Part of the prayer reads… “Almighty God, we acknowledge our dependence upon Thee, and we beg Thy blessings upon us, our parents, our teachers, and our country,”
The law allowed students to absent themselves from this activity if they found it objectionable.
A parent sued on behalf of his child, saying that the law violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment
The school board president, William Vitale v. Parent Steven Engel
jurisdictions
original jurisdiction
first heard by a New York court
Petitioners filed a successful appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court
Engel was supported by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and briefs were filed on their behalf by many committees, while the governments of over 20 states called on the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold the prayer.
supreme court ruling
Holding: Supported Engle 6-1
The majority held that school-sponsored prayer violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
Even though the provision allowed students to absent themselves from saying prayer did not make the law constitutional because the main purpose of the First Amendment was to prevent government interference with religion.
The majority recognized that religion is very important to a big part of the American population, but it still is not appropriate for the government to push any particular belief system.
Dissent
Justice Stewart argued in his dissent that the Establishment Clause was only meant to prohibit the establishment of a state-sponsored church, and not prohibit all types of government involvement with religion.
He thought that the nondenominational nature of the prayer and the way it was written removed constitutional issues.
He could not understand “how an ‘official religion’ is established by letting those who want to say a prayer say it. On the contrary, I think to deny the wish of these school children to join in reciting this prayer is to deny them the opportunity of sharing in the spiritual heritage of our Nation.”
The Supreme Court ruled that it is unconstitutional for a public school to sponsor religion. It violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, freedom of religion.
companion case
Abington School District v. Schempp (1963)
Found that school-sponsored Bible reading before class is unconstitutional.
A Pennsylvania law required that each school day starts with the Pledge of Allegiance and a reading from the Bible. The law let the students excuse themselves from this activity if they found it dissagrable to their beliefs.
The Court held that school-sponsored Bible reading constituted government endorsement of a particular religion, and thus violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
Holding was 8-1
COURT CASE: Engel v. Vitale
background
New York state’s Board of Regents wrote a voluntary nondenominational prayer that would be recited by students at the beginning of each school day
Part of the prayer reads… “Almighty God, we acknowledge our dependence upon Thee, and we beg Thy blessings upon us, our parents, our teachers, and our country,”
The law allowed students to absent themselves from this activity if they found it objectionable.
A parent sued on behalf of his child, saying that the law violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment
The school board president, William Vitale v. Parent Steven Engel
jurisdictions
original jurisdiction
first heard by a New York court
Petitioners filed a successful appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court
Engel was supported by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and briefs were filed on their behalf by many committees, while the governments of over 20 states called on the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold the prayer.
supreme court ruling
Holding: Supported Engle 6-1
The majority held that school-sponsored prayer violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
Even though the provision allowed students to absent themselves from saying prayer did not make the law constitutional because the main purpose of the First Amendment was to prevent government interference with religion.
The majority recognized that religion is very important to a big part of the American population, but it still is not appropriate for the government to push any particular belief system.
Dissent
Justice Stewart argued in his dissent that the Establishment Clause was only meant to prohibit the establishment of a state-sponsored church, and not prohibit all types of government involvement with religion.
He thought that the nondenominational nature of the prayer and the way it was written removed constitutional issues.
He could not understand “how an ‘official religion’ is established by letting those who want to say a prayer say it. On the contrary, I think to deny the wish of these school children to join in reciting this prayer is to deny them the opportunity of sharing in the spiritual heritage of our Nation.”
The Supreme Court ruled that it is unconstitutional for a public school to sponsor religion. It violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, freedom of religion.
companion case
Abington School District v. Schempp (1963)
Found that school-sponsored Bible reading before class is unconstitutional.
A Pennsylvania law required that each school day starts with the Pledge of Allegiance and a reading from the Bible. The law let the students excuse themselves from this activity if they found it dissagrable to their beliefs.
The Court held that school-sponsored Bible reading constituted government endorsement of a particular religion, and thus violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
Holding was 8-1