Cooper et al. 2015
Abstract
Study tested if wildlife recreationists are more likely to engage in pro-environmental behavior (PEB) than non-recreationists.
Compared PEB engagement among four groups: hunters, birdwatchers, hunter-birdwatchers, and non-nature-based recreationists.
Found that wildlife recreationists engaged in conservation behaviors 4-5 times more than non-recreationists, while lifestyle behaviors were similar across groups.
Key Findings
Wildlife recreationists (hunters and birdwatchers) significantly contribute to conservation initiatives.
Hunter-birdwatchers exhibited the highest conservation engagement.
No significant differences in environmental lifestyle behaviors between recreationist types.
Pro-environmental Behaviors (PEB)
Defined as actions promoting positive environmental impact and sustainable resource use.
90 million Americans engaged in some wildlife recreation as per 2011 National Survey.
Lack of clear links between types of wildlife recreation, environmental concern, and PEB in existing research.
Research Methodology
Surveys conducted with 941 rural New York residents.
Participants classified into four groups based on self-identification and activity levels.
Socio-demographic variables and beliefs were statistically controlled.
Results and Implications
High levels of self-reported PEB among birdwatchers.
Participation rates in conservation behaviors were notably higher relative to demographic factors.
PEBs include habitat enhancement, supporting environmental groups, and advocating for wildlife.
Socio-Demographics Data
Birdwatchers tend to be more educated, environmentally concerned, and predominantly female.
Hunters typically younger, less educated, and predominantly male.
Hunter-birdwatchers share traits with both groups.
Management Recommendations
Consolidate efforts to support both hunting and wildlife viewing to enhance conservation outcomes.
Recognize common values in conservation efforts between hunters and birdwatchers to increase engagement.
Assess and leverage demographic differences in conservation strategies.
Cooper et al. 2015
Abstract
Study tested if wildlife recreationists are more likely to engage in pro-environmental behavior (PEB) than non-recreationists.
Compared PEB engagement among four groups: hunters, birdwatchers, hunter-birdwatchers, and non-nature-based recreationists.
Found that wildlife recreationists engaged in conservation behaviors 4-5 times more than non-recreationists, while lifestyle behaviors were similar across groups.
Key Findings
Wildlife recreationists (hunters and birdwatchers) significantly contribute to conservation initiatives.
Hunter-birdwatchers exhibited the highest conservation engagement.
No significant differences in environmental lifestyle behaviors between recreationist types.
Pro-environmental Behaviors (PEB)
Defined as actions promoting positive environmental impact and sustainable resource use.
90 million Americans engaged in some wildlife recreation as per 2011 National Survey.
Lack of clear links between types of wildlife recreation, environmental concern, and PEB in existing research.
Research Methodology
Surveys conducted with 941 rural New York residents.
Participants classified into four groups based on self-identification and activity levels.
Socio-demographic variables and beliefs were statistically controlled.
Results and Implications
High levels of self-reported PEB among birdwatchers.
Participation rates in conservation behaviors were notably higher relative to demographic factors.
PEBs include habitat enhancement, supporting environmental groups, and advocating for wildlife.
Socio-Demographics Data
Birdwatchers tend to be more educated, environmentally concerned, and predominantly female.
Hunters typically younger, less educated, and predominantly male.
Hunter-birdwatchers share traits with both groups.
Management Recommendations
Consolidate efforts to support both hunting and wildlife viewing to enhance conservation outcomes.
Recognize common values in conservation efforts between hunters and birdwatchers to increase engagement.
Assess and leverage demographic differences in conservation strategies.
