Technical application of biological material is biotechnology.
Understanding biotechnology requires considering the starting material.
Biotechnology uses living material or biological products to create new products in medicine, agriculture, pharmaceuticals, and environment.
The ultimate goal of biotechnology is to benefit humanity through resistant crops, recombinant proteins, and higher milk-producing animals.
Developmental stages have occurred to meet specific human needs.
Development based on observations and their practical application.
The complexity of biotechnology has increased due to new technologies and a better understanding of life science principles.
Categories of biotechnology:
Ancient biotechnology (pre-1800)
Classical biotechnology
Modern biotechnology
Biotechnology development can be divided into stages:
Ancient biotechnology (8000–4000 BC):
Early history related to food and shelter.
Domestication of animals.
Classical biotechnology (2000 BC; 1800–1900 AD):
Built on ancient biotechnology.
Fermentation promotes food production and medicine.
1900–1953: Genetics.
1953–1976: DNA research, science explodes.
Modern biotechnology (1977):
Manipulates genetic information in organisms.
Genetic engineering.
Technologies improve crop yield and food quality and broaden the array of industrial products.
Industrial biotechnology
Biotechnology and the environment
Biotechnology and agriculture
Biotechnology in medicine
P4 medicine:
Predictive
Preventive
Personalized
Participatory
Past:
Health Model: Biomedical
Focus: Treatment of acute illness and injury
Time Frame: Immediate, short-term (days, weeks)
Importance of maternal and child health: Low
Present:
Health Model: Biopsychosocial
Focus: Management of chronic illness
Time Frame: Medium term (months, years)
Importance of maternal and child health: Moderate
Future:
Health Model: Health Development
Focus: Health optimization for all
Time Frame: Lifelong and multi-generational
Importance of maternal and child health: High
Health trajectories illustrate the impact of risk and protective factors on health development.
A. Health development trajectories are influenced by risk and protective factors.
B. Trajectories are not linear but fluctuate relative to influences at different points in time.
1st Era (1900s):
Life expectancy: 47
Ideas and Theories:
Germ Theory
Medical Anatomic/Pathologic Framework
2nd Era (1950s):
Life expectancy: 66
Biological Systems Ideas and Theories:
Darwinian Evolution
Mendelian Genetics
Population Genetics
Neo-Darwinian Synthesis: Molecular Biology (1 gene, 1 phenotype)
Epigenetics 1.0 (Waddington)
Medical and Health Systems Ideas and Theories:
BioMedical Models
Social Epidemiology
Epidemiology (Smoking, Eating, Exercise, Stress)
3rd Era (Today):
Life expectancy: 79
Biological Systems Ideas and Theories:
Systems Biology
Genomics
Biocomplexity
Other "omics"
DOAD
Epigenetics
Network Biology/Biocomplexity
Medical and Health Systems Ideas and Theories:
Biopsychosocial Models
Complex Systems Science
Post-Genomic Synthesis (relational gene networks)
Lifecourse Health Development
Framingham
Alameda
Life Span Human Developmental Psychology
Lifecourse Sociology
Lifecourse Chronic Disease Epidemiology
National Birth Cohort Studies
Neurodevelopment
Lifecourse Health Development (LCHD) Synthesis
Social Network Analysis
New Birth Cohort Studies
Conceptual Pathway Research Influence
Health Development Model
Two streams of scientific inquiry:
Biological System Ideas and Theories:
Development of conceptual constructs related to biological systems.
Darwinian evolution and Mendelian genetics influenced Neo-Darwinian synthesis and modern molecular biology.
Continues to evolve under systems biology, genomics, epigenetics, and complex systems science.
Medical and Health System Ideas and Theories:
Evolution from a simple biomedical model to a biopsychosocial model and then to a complex model of lifecourse health development (LCHD).
The Eras of Modern Health Care suggest the timing of conceptual changes in relation to healthcare organization and delivery.
Reactive Medicine—Evidence-Based Medicine:
Reactive: Responds after a patient is sick (symptoms-based).
Disease treatment system.
Few measurements.
Disease-centric with standard of care associated with population-based disease diagnosis.
Records not highly linked nor data integrated.
Large-scale diffusion of medical information mediated mostly through physicians alone.
Drugs tested against large populations (tens of thousands) to develop statistics for FDA.
Proactive P4 Medicine:
Proactive: Responds before a patient is sick (based on pre-symptomatic markers).
Wellness maintenance system.
Many measurements, including complete genome sequencing, high-parameter blood diagnostics, many longitudinal omics measurements.
Individual-centric, with standard of care tailored more fully to multiple measurements on the individual.
Deeply integrated data that can be mined for continued improvement of health care strategies.
Social networking of patients to enhance shared experiences and diffusion of knowledge in consultation with their physicians.
Stratification of disease populations into small groups (50 or so) that can be effectively treated to achieve FDA approval.