Participation in the learning session via menti.com using code 4667 7650.
Class: Foundation Year
Module: Communication Professionalism in the Health Sciences 1
Code: COMMPROF.18
Lecturer: Eric Clarke
Date: Thursday, 17-Oct-24
Time: 14:00 - 15:00 (Dublin time)
Understanding Dis and Misinformation: Gain clarity on what constitutes misinformation and disinformation and the mechanics of their spread.
Role of Healthcare Professionals: Reflect on the responsibility of healthcare professionals in challenging poor quality information.
Database Contrast: Differentiate between healthcare-specific databases and general online databases.
Terminology Definitions: Learn and define key terminology related to online information sources.
Validity Analysis: Assess the validity of healthcare websites based on authority, accuracy, objectivity, coverage, currency, and design.
Peer Review: Comprehend the significance of peer review in healthcare journals.
A variety of PDFs including:
A Deadly Infodemic
Buying Meds Online
Cancer Misinformation
Tackling Contraceptive Misinformation
Misinformation: False information spread without the intention to mislead.
Disinformation: False information spread intentionally to deceive.
Bias: Prejudice against a person or group, conscious or unconscious.
Accessibility Issues: Anyone can publish online content.
Misleading Platforms: Social media's loud and unfiltered environments complicate discerning valid sources.
Quality Standards: A lack of uniform quality standards for health information online.
War of the Worlds Broadcast (1938): Examines mass hysteria caused by Orson Welles' broadcast of an alien invasion, showcasing how misinformation can lead to panic.
The Sun's false reports following the Hillsborough disaster and their subsequent impact on public perception of football fans.
Fake News Warnings: Growing concerns over fake news proliferation in Ireland affecting public confidence.
Social Media Impact: Social media often amplifies misleading information, with tech companies criticized for not effectively handling the problem.
Misinformation has serious consequences, including:
Erosion of trust in health systems and science.
Strain on healthcare systems.
Increased morbidity and mortality.
Healthcare professionals need to actively engage with patients and communities on misinformation.
Collaborative efforts with local organizations are crucial for accurate health communication.
Sources:
Commercial websites (71.8%)
Search engines (11.6%)
Academically affiliated sites (11.1%)
Government-sponsored websites (5.5%)
Information-seeking behaviors highlight a significant reliance on less credible sources, particularly among younger demographics.
Key Questions:
Who published the information?
What is the funding source?
How is the information reviewed?
When was it last updated?
How is the privacy of personal information protected?
Recognize different website domains (.gov, .edu, .org, .com) as indicators of credibility.
Authority: Review qualifications and credibility of authors.
Accuracy: Validate information against reliable sources.
Objectivity: Ensure impartial presentation of information.
Coverage: Evaluate comprehensiveness and audience needs.
Currency: Confirm information is up-to-date.
Design: Assess the design and navigation quality of websites.
The Six Key Areas:
Authority
Accuracy
Objectivity
Coverage
Currency
Design
The elimination of the Fairness Doctrine in the US has led to increased polarization in public discourse and declining news quality.
Confirmation Bias: A tendency to accept information that supports existing beliefs.
Cue-taking: Acceptance of claims from preferred leaders and media sources.
People share health misinformation to connect socially, provide protection to loved ones, and make sense of their experiences.
The impact of online misinformation on vaccine hesitancy, particularly highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Peer review serves as a quality control mechanism in academic publications, ensuring validity, accuracy, and credibility of research.