In-depth Notes on Gender-Responsive Approach to Female Offending
Overview of Gender-Responsive Approach (GR) to Female Offending
The Gender-Responsive (GR) approach focuses on understanding and addressing the unique needs of female offenders.
This research note critically examines the effectiveness of GR tools and theory, suggesting that factors like finances and relationships may play a more crucial role than previously acknowledged.
Key Issues Identified in the GR Approach
Mixed Effectiveness: Examination of GR assessment tools shows that results about their effectiveness are inconclusive.
Pathways Literature: Traditional focus on trauma and mental health as primary causes of female offending might be misplaced.
Mixed Gender Findings: Studies indicate significant overlap in male and female pathways to crime, questioning the uniqueness of female offending experiences.
Increase in Female Imprisonment
Between 1990 and 2005, the female prison population doubled in the U.S. and tripled in England despite a decline post-2005.
Number of imprisoned women in the U.S. increased by 83,000 and 2,000 in England over two decades.
Development of GR Assessment Tools
GR tools were developed as a response to the growing recognition of female offenders' needs, in contrast to the traditional Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R).
LSI-R: Measures recidivism risk based on the RNR (risk, needs, responsivity) model. Critics argue that it doesn’t adequately address the unique needs of female offenders.
Criticism of LSI-R
Feminist criminologists argue LSI-R homogenizes women's diverse needs and fails to consider cultural and socioeconomic factors.
A GR hybrid model addressing pathways literature focuses on abuse, mental health, and unhealthy relationships.
Varying Effectiveness of GR Interventions
Evaluations of GR interventions yield mixed results; some show a temporary reduction in recidivism while others find no significant differences compared to traditional interventions.
Example: The Moving On program led to lower recidivism rates in voluntary participants compared to mandatory participants due to inherent willingness to change.
Understanding Pathways to Crime
GR theories suggest distinct pathways for women based on trauma and mental health yet numerous studies indicate significant overlap with male offenders:
Daly's Research: Identified five pathways to crime; overlaps exist in experiences of victimization and later life deficits.
Joosen et al. Study: Found four comparable types of offenders: multiproblem property offenders, multiproblem violent offenders, drug-connected offenders, and low-risk offenders.
Financial Issues and Relationships
Financial instability and problematic relationships are critical factors in female offending, with debts being particularly influential in criminal behavior.
Studies indicate that individuals with debts are 3.6 times more likely to commit crimes. Significant financial strain can aggravate the reoffending cycle post-incarceration.
The Age of Onset in Offending
Patterns in onset of offending differ between genders; women show higher rates of late-onset offending compared to men, with 78% of female offenders starting post-18 years old.
Early onset identified in a minority of women correlates to significant childhood adversity, but late-onset offenders exhibit more stable early lives, complicating the narrative around pathways and risk factors.