Firms: Airbus and Boeing competing in the aeroplane market.
Variables:
qA: aeroplanes produced by Airbus
qB: aeroplanes produced by Boeing
pA: price charged by Airbus
pB: price charged by Boeing
Demand functions:
For Airbus: qA = 10 - pA + βpB (with β ≥ 0)
For Boeing: qB = 10 - pB + αpA (with α ≥ 0)
Cost structure: Each firm incurs a cost of cqi, where c > 0.
Airbus Profit:
πA = pA * qA - c * qA = pA * (10 - pA + βpB) - c(10 - pA + βpB)
Boeing Profit:
πB = pB * qB - c * qB = pB * (10 - pB + αpA) - c(10 - pB + αpA)
Airbus: To maximize profit, set the derivative of πA with respect to pA to zero:
dπA/dpA = 0
Boeing: Set the derivative of πB with respect to pB to zero:
dπB/dpB = 0
Check profit concavity:
Investigate the second derivatives of πA and πB with respect to their own prices.
Explore concavity conditions: are the second derivatives negative, or do they exhibit other behaviors?
Determine the nature of solutions from first-order conditions (maximum or minimum).
First-Order Conditions in matrix form:
AP = B where P is vector of prices (pA, pB)T and A, B are defined parameter matrices.
Given condition (αβ < 4), solve the first-order conditions system to find optimal prices (p∗A, p∗B).
Effect of α and β change:
Discuss how variations in α and β influence the optimal prices (p∗A, p∗B).
Interpret findings from economic perspective.
Government objectives: Minimize loss function L(u, π, α) = (u + απ)^2
Constraints: Phillips curve given by π = g(u, β).
Write Lagrangian based on the optimization problem considering the constraint.
Compute conditions from Lagrangian optimization.
Analyze conditions to check if they indicate a minimum.
Investigate how the increase in β affects the optimal inflation rate in terms of comparative statics.
Use the envelope theorem to compute the comparative statics effect on the loss function, ∂L/∂β.
Decision factors: Household must decide on consumption and savings across two periods with income w1 and w2 and utility v(c1, c2).
Savings: Can save s1 at rate r.
Write out the separate budget constraints and combine them into an intertemporal constraint.
Prove that budget constraints should bind at maximum to ensure no contradictions exist in the consumption decisions.
Develop the Lagrangian for the constrained maximization problem.
List the first-order conditions for the maximization problem based on Lagrangian methods.
Indicate conditions on the utility function v ensuring maximum at first-order conditions solution.
Analyze how c2 changes as a function of c1 through the implicit function theorem.
Hypothesis: There’s a linear relationship between saving (yi) and income (xi).
Modeling equation: yi = α + βxi + εi.
Objective: Minimize sum of squared errors: Σ(εi)^2.
Show the relationship of minimizing the sum of squared errors to maximizing the negative value of the same.
Write first-order conditions from the minimization setup of parameters α and β.
Solve for the optimal values of α and β based on the established conditions.
Explore if solutions from the first-order conditions indicate a minimum or maximum scenario.
Utility function: u(x) subject to budget constraint px ≤ w.
Formulate the Lagrangian for the optimization problem.
Derive the first-order conditions necessary for optimization from the Lagrangian.
Show that if the utility function u is concave, it assures a maximum at the solution.
Utilize Taylor expansion to illustrate utility properties under concavity.
Conclude that there exists λ > 0 such that u(y) ≤ u(x) + λp(y - x).