The session focuses on Chapter 9, Assignment 4 with prior discussions.
Solutions for the assignment and Gradebook updates already available on Canvas.
Exam Number Two review took place prior to the class.
Small issues with exam content noted to avoid mistakes in grading.
Students encouraged to familiarize themselves with the assignment problems, particularly those appearing on the exam.
Presents a comparison of two industries in China and Pakistan producing earrings and shoes.
China's output:
8 earrings per hour
4 pairs of shoes per hour
Pakistan’s output:
2 earrings per hour
4 pairs of shoes per hour
Additional anecdote about lost shoes observed on roads.
Opportunity cost reflects the real cost of producing one more unit of a good.
China’s opportunity cost for earrings:
1 earring = 0.5 pairs of shoes (calculation: 4 shoes/8 earrings)
Pakistan’s opportunity cost for earrings:
1 earring = 2 pairs of shoes (calculation: 4 shoes/2 earrings)
Opportunity cost for shoes:
China: 1 pair of shoes = 2 earrings (calculation: 8 earrings/4 shoes)
Pakistan: 1 pair of shoes = 0.5 earrings (calculation: 2 earrings/4 shoes)
Comparative advantage determines which country should produce which good.
China has a comparative advantage in earrings (0.5 < 2).
Pakistan has a comparative advantage in shoes (0.5 < 2).
Autarky implies no trade; each country solely consumes what it produces.
Each country has 1,000 labor hours, with a split of 500 hours to each good:
China:
Earrings: 4,000 produced (8 earrings x 500 hours)
Shoes: 2,000 produced (4 shoes x 500 hours)
Pakistan:
Earrings: 1,000 produced (2 earrings x 500 hours)
Shoes: 2,000 produced (4 shoes x 500 hours)
Trade specialization leads to higher overall production.
If both countries specialize:
China would focus on earrings: Producing 8,000 earrings (8 earrings x 1,000 hours).
Pakistan would focus on shoes: Producing 4,000 shoes (4 shoes x 1,000 hours).
Terms of trade: China trades 2,000 earrings for 2,000 pairs of shoes from Pakistan.
Following trade:
China ends up with 6,000 earrings and 2,000 shoes.
Pakistan ends up with 2,000 earrings and 2,000 shoes.
Free trade is without government restrictions, yielding better economic outcomes for consumers and producers.
Consumers generally benefit from lower prices on goods due to international trade.
Surplus calculations:
Economic surplus combines consumer surplus and producer surplus.
Any reduction in economic surplus represents a deadweight loss.
Some industries lobby for tariffs and quotas to protect jobs, leading to inefficiencies in the economy.
Estimated high costs per job maintained through tariffs (e.g., sugar, tires, and steel tariffs).
Restrictive policies harm overall economic welfare despite benefiting a small number of workers.
Trade restrictions often create inefficiencies, leading to potential deadweight loss.
Economic theory suggests that unilaterally reducing trade barriers, even without reciprocity, would improve overall welfare.