The chapter explores the formation of Asian American identity and culture, particularly during the Asian American Movement.
It addresses the challenges faced by Asian Americans in a complex America and world.
Highlights the necessity for Asian Americans to understand their cultural history to assert their humanity.
Asian Americans are frequently asked, "Where are you really from?"
The question implies they are strangers, unlike European Americans.
Many young, middle-class Asian Americans felt alienated from American society, mirroring a broader generational malaise.
They viewed American society as culturally sterile and dominated by corrupt institutions.
The U.S. government's foreign policy in Southeast Asia and conscription further fueled their disillusionment.
They questioned aspects beyond their control and experienced racial prejudice, feeling like unwelcome foreigners despite being American.
Asian Americans felt "in American culture, but not of it."
Asian Americans experienced disillusionment upon realizing the U.S. Constitution's promises of equality did not fully apply to them.
This realization led to feelings of betrayal and radicalization.
Having been rejected after attempting assimilation, they sought alternatives.
They aimed to establish a place in America's pluralist society by developing a unique ethnic identity and counterculture.
The Movement facilitated a pan-Asian consciousness, transforming Asian ethnics into Asian Americans.
An early effort to develop an Asian American identity was the "Asian American Experience in America-Yellow Identity" conference in 1969 at UC Berkeley.
Approximately 900 Asian Americans, mainly Chinese and Japanese Americans from the West Coast, attended.
The conference aimed to explore Asian-American history, destiny, and the need for solidarity in a predominantly white society.
The event challenged the stereotype of Asian Americans as "mellow yellow."
The conference shifted unexpectedly into a political convention, with students addressing the Third World strike at San Francisco State College.
Sponsoring groups distanced themselves from adopting resolutions.
The conference highlighted the need for sustained efforts to achieve ethnic solidarity.
Asian Americans formed consciousness-raising groups to address identity issues.
These meetings provided a cathartic experience, allowing individuals to release negative feelings and inner tensions.
Participants helped each other deconstruct unconscious cultural assumptions.
Some Asian Americans had futilely attempted to physically transform themselves to resemble European Americans.
Individuals like Amy Tan and Edward Iwata felt confused and inferior due to societal pressure to conform to the dominant culture.
They recognized the need to develop a self-defined identity to overcome psychological and political vulnerability.
The goal was to integrate past experiences with present conditions and foster group esteem and pride through collective action.
The Movement became the means of accomplishing this identity formation.
Activists believed cultural domination played a central role in shaping individual identities.
The absence of an autonomous culture contributed to their powerlessness.
They felt estranged from Asian cultures, viewing them through a Eurocentric lens.
Asian cultures were perceived negatively due to their emphasis on group conformity, agrarian stagnation, and oppression of women.
American culture was esteemed for individual freedom, commercial enterprise, and material advancement.
Before the 1960s, Asian Americans were often assumed to benefit from both American and Asian cultures.
Activists like Frank Chin criticized the concept of a dual heritage as racist.
He argued that society falsely assumes Asian Americans maintain their cultural integrity as Asians.
This notion explains their seeming inability to assimilate and justifies injustices against them.
Asian American activists rejected the dual heritage concept, emphasizing a distinct Asian American identity shaped by their experiences in America.
They sought to define "Asian America" by refuting stereotypes, reclaiming their history, and reconstructing their culture.
Combating stereotypes was and remains a major concern within the Movement.
Historically, stereotypes reflected antagonism towards Asian immigrants and Asian countries.
Before the Immigration Act of 1924, anti-Asian sentiment stemmed from fears of economic competition and racial mixing.
Nativism portrayed Asians as unassimilable aliens and actively discouraged their assimilation.
The image of Asian Americans as perpetual foreigners reinforced the idea that only European Americans could be "authentic" Americans.
In the 1930s, anti-Asian animus arose from anxieties over the military threat posed by Asian nations, particularly Japan.
Asians were perceived as a Yellow Peril threatening Western civilization.
Racial stereotypes have portrayed Asians as subhumans, inhumans, or superhumans, but rarely as humans.
Subhumans: Asians are depicted as having a low regard for human life, exemplified by suicidal attacks in war movies.
Inhumans: Asian villains are portrayed as lacking compassion and seeking world domination.
Superhumans: Asians are depicted as geniuses with arcane knowledge or masters of martial arts, often used for evil.
Examples: Fu Manchu, Charlie Chan, Bruce Lee.
Asian Americans are often compared unfavorably to European Americans, who are seen as the standard. This skewed representation contributes to a narrow understanding of Asian American identity, positioning them as either the sinister villain or the exotic hero, thereby overshadowing the rich diversity and complexity within Asian American communities.