MA

Co-Teaching Strategies

Introduction

  • Presenters Overview: The district has many presenters, intentionally chosen to hear from teachers implementing co-teaching.

  • Purpose: To discuss co-teaching strategies and their effectiveness in high school settings.

District Presenters

  • Joy DeCino: Director of student support services.

  • Chris Racklip: Algebra teacher.

  • Sarah Georgetti: Ninth-grade regular education algebra teacher.

  • Leo West: Special education teacher, geography.

  • Angela Martinez: General education teacher, Introduction to Teaching.

  • Daniel Rape: Special education teacher.

  • Harry Grace: Special education teacher, World History.

Co-Teaching Overview

  • Expectations: Attendees have interest in co-teaching initiatives and understanding its implementation challenges.

  • Approach Goals: Sharing outcomes on teacher practices and student outcomes, emphasizing anecdotal and statistical insights.

Co-Teaching Training Development

  • Initial Collaboration: Developed co-teaching training focusing on impactful practices.

  • Analogy of Co-Teaching: Compared to college roommates rather than a marriage; often assigned without prior knowledge.

  • Professional Development Focus: Job embedded training, modeling effective co-teaching practices within the classroom.

Key Co-Teaching Models

  • Focus on Three Models: Station teaching, Parallel teaching, and Alternate teaching.

  • Emphasis on Impact: Selection of high-yield models known to enhance student outcomes.

Job Embedded Training Details

  • Implementation Process: Monthly visits from trainers, formative feedback, and co-planning time for teachers.

  • Look For Tool: Developed for evaluating general and specific co-teaching practices without formal evaluation.

Differentiation in Co-Teaching

  • Addressing Disabilities: Integration of strategies tailored to support students with disabilities effectively.

  • Differentiated Instruction: Focus on specially designed instruction versus generic differentiation in co-teaching settings.

Implementation Cycles

  • Three-Step Process:

    • Step 1: Training and coaching on specific models over six weeks.

    • Step 2: Teacher implementation of strategies with feedback sessions following.

    • Step 3: Observation and refinement of strategies leading to ongoing implementation.

  • Year Two Focus: Continuous improvement of the co-teaching approach across all classes.

Teachers’ Experiences and Observations

  • Feedback Mechanism: Teachers receive ongoing feedback through observations and collaborative planning.

  • Student Feedback: Conducted surveys to gauge students’ experiences and perceptions of co-teaching; found higher engagement and understanding with two teachers.

  • Positive Responses: Majority reported increased enjoyment and understanding from dual-teacher models.

Data Insights and Results

  • Student Surveys: 44 responses from grades 9-12 noted greater engagement and understanding from co-taught classes.

  • Classroom Experiences:

    • Improved engagement and instructional effectiveness noted by students due to the collaborative model.

    • Students reported feeling more included and confident in their learning environments.

Challenges and Solutions

  • Common Concerns: Inconsistency in co-teaching partnerships and challenges in classroom management.

  • Strategies for Improvement:

    • Emphasizing collaborative planning for smooth classroom synergy.

    • Focusing on classroom setup to minimize distraction and maximize interaction.

Administrative Support and Training

  • Involvement of Administrators: Ensuring necessary resources and schedule adjustments to support co-teaching models.

  • Critical Training Elements: Importance of having collaborative environments to define roles and expectations clearly.

Panel Insights

  • Effective Strategies Shared: Co-teachers discuss their unique approaches and adjustments made for effective collaboration.

  • Benefits Recognized: Building relationships, focusing on student growth, and enhancing collaboration noted as key takeaways from experiences.

Conclusion

  • Call for Questions: Opportunities for participants to engage with teachers and administrators about experiences and seek advice on implementing co-teaching.

  • Contact Information Provided: For further inquiries and continued conversation on co-teaching practices.