�

W2 Reading – Reformation & the Disenchantment Debate (Walsham, 2008)

Origins of the “Disenchantment” Thesis

  • Max Weber (1904–05)
    • Coined the term entzauberung (“disenchantment”) in The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism.
    • Argued that ascetic Protestantism rejected “sacramental magic,” fostering a rationalized, inward faith that expelled numinous forces from everyday life.
    • Calvinist doctrines of vocation and predestination created psychological incentives for disciplined economic activity.
    • Saw the Reformation as part of a larger historical process eliminating magical–supernatural assumptions and enabling capitalism.
  • Ernst Troeltsch (contemporary of Weber)
    • Offered a more nuanced, theological version, still casting the Reformation as an indirect agent of modernization.
  • Intellectual Context
    • Thesis strongly linked to narratives of modernity, secularization, and the triumph of “reason” over “superstition.”
    • Influenced later Anglophone historiography and popular culture.

Classic Anglophone Formulations

  • Keith Thomas, Religion and the Decline of Magic (1971)
    • Adopted Weberian logic—Reformation shifted religion from ritual to internalized dogma.
    • Emancipated English people from “superstitious” beliefs once “rightly disdained by intelligent persons.”
    • Saw process as popular, rapid, and from below rather than imposed.
    • Cast Protestant “rational” religiosity as a step toward technological modernity.
  • Other Weber-inspired scholars
    • Bernhard Vogler; Richard van Dülmen; Thomas Nipperdey; Carlos Eire.
    • Linked Protestant iconoclasm to the Scientific Revolution and an “abstract” faith based on reason.

Revisionism Since the 1980s

  • Robert W. Scribner
    • Emphasized continuities between medieval and Protestant mentalities.
    • Reformation modified, rather than destroyed, the “economy of the sacred.”
    • Protestantism created new rituals and even its own magic.
    • Helped inspire a broader shift from “success” to “failure” narratives of Reformation impact.
  • “Popular Culture” & Mentalité Studies
    • Focus on grass-roots practice, syncretism, resistance to elite theology.
    • Highlights gaps between doctrine and lived religion.
  • Ulinka Rublack, Reformation Europe (2005)
    • Stresses limits of disenchantment and even intensification of sacramental assumptions to c.1650.

Extension to the Long Reformation

  • Concept of a Long Reformation (1500–1800)
    • Recognizes centuries-long evolution rather than a short, decisive break.
  • Post-1700 Studies
    • Owen Davies, Jane Shaw, Sasha Handley: survival of ghosts, angels, miracles in “Age of Reason.”
    • Hanoverian & Victorian occult revivals suggest re-emergence rather than novelty.

Parallel Catholic Developments

  • Counter-Reformation not merely reactive; shared goals of moral reform and anti-superstition.
  • Tridentine Church both restrained and authenticated miracles.
    • Inquisitorial scrutiny of relics, visions, and aspiring saints.
  • Baroque Catholicism re-embraced the miraculous yet policed fraud.

Medieval Reassessment

  • Eamon Duffy et al.: Late medieval piety vibrant, not moribund.
  • Church had long policed superstition (e.g., Guibert de Nogent, John Gerson).
  • Skepticism and belief co-existed; canonization processes used “medical” tests.
  • Demonological elaboration partly a response to crisis of belief (Walter Stephens).

Postmodern & Anthropological Influences

  • Relativizing “reason”; retrieving internal logic of astrology, witchcraft, providence.
  • Stuart Clark: demonology as sophisticated “science of the preternatural.”

Reformation’s Ambiguous Legacy

  • Anti-sacramental Rhetoric
    • Polemics portrayed Catholic practices as “stocks and stones.”
    • Iconoclasm offered experiential proof of image impotence.
  • Providence & Demonology Remained Central
    • Heightened sense of apocalypse → intensified witch-hunting.
  • New Sacred Persons & Objects
    • Protestant martyrs, charismatic preachers, Luther’s “incombustible” images, royal “healing touch.”
    • Bibles/prayer books became amulets; destroyed stained glass kept as relics.
  • Ritual Persistence & Reinvention
    • Fasts, rogations, exorcisms, sabbatarianism show ongoing ritual efficacy.
  • Space & Time Resacralized
    • Consecrated churches; healing mineral springs; national thanksgivings (e.g., 5 Nov. Gunpowder Day).

Engines of Change Beyond Theology

  • Print Culture
    • Dual role: spreads occult handbooks yet mass-produces skeptical exposés.
    • Commercial “strange-but-true” genre → eventual credibility crisis.
  • Social Polarization
    • Learned disdain labelled marvels as “old wives’ tales.”
    • Folklore collection (18th–19th c.) both preserved and patronized popular belief.
  • Private vs Public Spheres
    • Gentlemen hid supernatural interests (e.g., Robert Boyle’s self-censorship).
  • Party & Confessional Conflict
    • Demonology weaponized in polemics; over-use eroded authority.
    • 1736 Witchcraft Act repeal political more than intellectual.

Science, Enlightenment & Re-enchantment

  • Religious Roots of Science
    • Newton, Boyle pursued natural philosophy to glorify providence; involved in alchemy.
    • “Laws of Nature” re-defined miracles rather than abolished them.
  • Experimental Authentication
    • Joseph Glanvill: used empirical methods to prove spirits.
    • Miracles and ghosts investigated with Baconian rigor.
  • Deism & Skepticism
    • Attacked clerical “priestcraft,” not necessarily God.
  • Counter-Moves
    • Methodist revival and Romanticism sought spiritual re-infusion; folklore and Gothic literature aestheticized the supernatural.

Cycles Rather than Linear Decline

  • Walsham proposes thinking in loops of desacralization and resacralization.
  • Early Reformation skepticism → later 17th-century re-supernaturalization.
  • Enlightenment prompts both disbelief and apologetic miracle collections.
  • Ongoing modern “occult revivals” echo earlier patterns.

Historiographical Implications

  • Challenge teleological models tying Protestantism to inevitable secular modernity.
  • Necessity of integrating medieval, early modern, and modern periods; avoid rigid period labels.
  • Recognize interplay of belief/unbelief, elite/popular, practice/theory.
  • Disenchantment thesis now seen as historiographical “red herring”; future work may abandon linear paradigm altogether.