WIC program (woman infant children)
supplies supplemental food, health care referrals
participation is associated with better birth outcomes
children who participate have better cognitive development
the longer children are in the program, the better diet is in the long run
Piaget’s preoperational stage
2-7 years of age
symbolic function substage
children start to use symbolic representation of things
ex. language, drawing something on a piece of paper, pretending a stick is a sword, pretend play
pretend play
egocentrism: child believes that they are the main character
everyone else is seeing the world the same way they are seeing it
mountain task:
3d model of mountain landscape that is different from other sides
“what does the doll see”
child describes what they themselves are looking at
animism: giving human qualities/feeling to inanimate objects
intuitive thought substage
asking why
want to know everything
want true concrete answers
centration
focus only on one feature of something
Vygotsky’s theory
social constructivist approach
zone of proximal development
lower limit: things a child can do without help
upper limit: things a child can do with instruction
in between is ZPD, new things a child can learn how to do
scaffolding
restructuring where child is given the tools to do something on their own that they normally wouldn’t be able to do
thought
develop in a 3 step process
others’ statement
direct child’s behavior
private speech
child verbally talks to themselves
internalized private speech
the talk is internalized
Information-processing theory
overall idea is that the brain is a computer
attention
executive attention
overall organizing yourself
ex. what class do i have after this
sustained attention
focusing all your attention on one thing
school readiness
better prepared for school when attention is better
they score higher of school readiness
skills that children are expected to have when they start school
short-term memory
aka working memory
actively holding information in attention
digit-span task
limited capacity of 7-9 things at a time
strategies to remember numbers
can chunk numbers together
rehearsal
theory that children have a full capacity but they develop strategies to remember more numbers at once
long-term memory
first long-term memories begin around early childhood
memory is malleable, especially for young children
they are very susceptible to suggestion and they rely on others to help remember things
age
younger children are more willing to believe somebody than older
individual differences
personality and temperment
some children will be more resistant and other will be more accepting/open
interviewing techniques
for having children testify in court
children are susceptible to leading questions
need interviewers with a neutral tone and don’t ask any leading questions for more accurate memory recall
autobiographical memory
experiences that the child has had
a type of long term memory
executive function
in prefrontal cortex
cognitive inhibition: stop yourself from doing things
ex. temper tantrum, saying rude things
cognitive flexibility: dealing with new situations well
goal-setting: create a goal and taking steps to complete
delay of gratification: choosing not to accept an immediate reward to get a better reward later
ex. marshmellow test
Phonology and Morphology
phonology: sound system of a language, how different sounds can be combined to make words
morphology: knowledge that different sounds can change the meaning of the word
ex. adding -ed to the end of a word to make it past tense
overgeneralization: learning one rule and using it on everything
ex. learning that you put -s to make something plural, “I have two foots”
Berko (1958): to test the grammar rule of adding an s at the end, do the children actually understand or have they just memorized the word
syntax: the structure of a sentence
semantics: meaning of words and sentences
Pragmatics: how to appropriately use language
rules of conversation and politeness
project head start - federally funded program
target disadvantaged children who can’t afford preschool
build up academic skills so they are ready to start grade school and won’t be behind
mixed results
children in the program perform better academically in the start of school but then the effects plateau after a while
parenting contributions
good home environments, programs like head start will show better, long-lasting results
curriculum
constructivist approach
kids actively participating in activities
has more emphasis on socioemotional development
kids typically interact with each other, which builds socioemotional skills
direct-instruction approach
kids sitting on a mat listening to a teacher telling them how to do something
Erikson’s psychosocial development
initiative vs guilt
stage is categorized by curiosity on how the world works
if child is taking initiative and exploring, they will overcome the crisis
if they are ridiculed and punished, they will feel guilty and less likely to take initiative for the future
first step to developing an identity
Piaget’s Moral Reasoning
heteronomous morality stage
cannot change or break rules
if you break rules you are bad
justice and rules are unchangeable properties
outcome > intention
believe in immanent justice
if you do something wrong, your consequence will happen immediately
transition stage is 3 years
autonomous morality
rules and laws are created by people
social contracts that we have all agreed to follow
they are changeable
intention > outcome
kinner’s operant conditioning
behaviors have consequences
learn morals based on reinforcements/punishments given by caregiver
more likely to be reinforced for good moral behavior
Bandura’s social cognitive theory
observation, vicarious reinforcement
caregiver models moral behavior
social role theory
gender differences of how people act within society
children understand what these roles are
psychoanalytic theory of gender (Freud)
Oedipus and Electra complex
children are attracted to the opposite sex parent
same-sex parent
then switch and identify more with same sex parents
because they learn that sex is bad
critique of Freud (Callan, 2001)
relies on children have sexual feelings
gender-typed behavior: behavior that align with gender
Freud said this starts around 5 years old but gender-typed behavior starts before that
social cognitive theory of gender
observation and imitation of those with the same behavior
reward and punishment of gender-typed behavior
the way that people react to them based on how ppl behave
ex. girls get reinforced for playing for doll but boys get punished
gender-based treatment
gender schema theory
schema: what is appropriate for each gender
flow chart
emotional security theory
how children evaluate conflict
negative conflict: when parents are fighting and being nasty to each other
unhealthy for child to witness
positive conflict: parents can calmly discuss it, constructively working through the problem
healthy for child to witness
functions of play
anxiety and conflict
Freud said children play to alleviate anxiety because they are always thinking about sex
cognitive development
play is a way to explore environments, learn how to manipulate environments
exploratory drive
satisfy the need to explore and try new things
language and communication
play can develop language and communication
because you are with others
establishing rules/expectations
types of play
sensorimotor play
babies and toddlers
interacting with things in environment
looking at textures/colors/etc
practice play
repeating the same action to try to get better at it
ex. sports
pretense/symbolic play
imagining stuff in the environment is something else
ex. couch is a pirate ship, stick is a sword
social play
interacting with others
constructive play
combo of sensorimotor/practice and symbolic
ex. build a pirate ship with blocks
games
things that have rules
usually involves competition
learning disabilities
difficulty in understanding or using spoken or written language
listening, thinking, reading, writing, spelling
dyslexia: difficulty reading and spelling
dysgraphia: difficulty hand writing and matching sounds and letters
dyscalculia: difficulty understanding numbers and performing math equations
may be caused by issues information integration across brain regions
diff parts of brain not communicating with each other
education of children with disabilities
individuals with disabilities education act (IDEA)
required children to have access to public schooling, regardless of disability status
individualized education plan (IEP)
taking individual needs into account and accommodating them so they can be successful in school
least restrictive environment (LRE)
educating those with disabilities in a environment that looks like a classroom
their experiences align to as closely as possible to other children while having need met
inclusion
Piaget’s Concrete Operational Stage
7-11 years old
logical reasoning
more logical reasoning
increase in classifications and understanding of interrelationships
seriation: putting things in order by some sort of rule
can do this
develop transitivity: using what you know about a few relationships to develop a conclusion about a new relationship
A=B
B=C
A _ C
Information-Processing Theory
working memory: actively manipulating and analyzing
if good working memory, then better at:
language comprehension
math skills
problem solving
reasoning
long-term memory
building knowledge and expertise
ex. Chess (Chi, 1978)
elementary students who were experts in chess vs college students who didn’t play chess
children were better at remembering the position of the pieces
understanding of how chess works
children learn strategies when learning info to make it easier to retrieve it later
elaboration: process it in more detail
ex. your own example, relate it to your own life
mental imagery: visualize it
comprehension > memorization
thinking
critical thinking: thinking reflectively, evaluating info to come to your own conclusion
schools don’t teach this
you don’t analyze content, you rehearse
critical thinking allows for deep understanding of info
creative thinking: use a new strategy to solve problems
intelligence vs creativity
intelligence test convergent thinking (same, correct answer)
creativity tests divergent thinking
creativity in the US
declining since the 1990s
because of screens, internet
never bored because we don’t have to entertain ourselves
metacognition: knowledge about cognition and thinking, strategies for thinking
error recognition
ex. comes in play when learning how to do math
better metacognition, higher school achievement
includes metamemory: knowledge about memories
ex. what kinds of things are harder/easier to remember
includes knowledge about strategies to think better
executive function
increase in self-control/inhibition
working memory is a big part of doing things in school
ex. activities in class, homework assignments
flexibility
ex. problem solving, adapting
the Binet Tests
first test to test intelligence
mental age (MA)
performing better than other ppl same chronological age: better mental age
intelligence quotient (IQ)
IQ = mental age / chronological age x 100
current name is Stanford-Binet tests
the Wechsler Scales
Wechler intelligence scale for Children-fifth edition (WISC-V)
scale for child
different scales for different age groups
give IQ score
individual scores for:
verbal comprehension
processing speed
fluid reasoning
visual spatial
Sternber’s Triarchic Theory
analytical intelligence
academic skills: make judgements, analyze info
are better students in school
creative intelligence
imaginative, design and invent things
want to solve problems in their own way, don’t like having explicit instruction
practical intelligence
relate to people socially, be able to go out in the world
street smarts, have a lot of common sense and social abilities
Gardner’s Eight frames of mind
kinds of intelligence
verbal: ability to use langauge
mathematical
spatial: ability to manipulate objects in 3d space
interpersonal: communicating with others
intrapersonal: knowledge about yourself, your thoughts and feelings
naturalistic: observing patterns in nature, understanding how ppl interact with each other
Erikson’s theory of psychosocial development
industry vs inferiority
curiosity about the world and how it works
how useful do you feel when you are older
industry
how things are made
how things work
encourage “doing”
ex. pulling apart a mechanical toy to see the parts
encouraged by parents
inferiority
mischief
making a mess
told that exploring is bad, being met with punishment
won’t feel useful when they are older
Kohlberg Levels
preconventional level
stage 1: punishment and obedience orientation
rules are the rules, if you break them you deserve to be punished
stage 2: instrumental exchange orientation
an eye for an eye, you do smth to me, i get to do smth to you back
conventional level
stage 3: mutual interpersonal expectations, relationships, and interpersonal conformity orientation
behavior is judged right/wrong based on how other interpret it
you behave in a way that makes others like you
stage 4: social system and conscience orientation
keeping the wheel of society turning in a beneficial manner, not behaving that causes a breakdown of society’s systems
maintaining social order
postconventional level
stage 5: social contracts or individual rights orientation
behave in ways that maximize the benefit for the majority of people
universal ethics principles
most people don’t ever reach this stage
you as an individual have developed a code of ethics and you behave in ways that follow that code
it’s okay to break rules if you’re upholding your personal ethical principles
Kohlberg’s critics
focused more on moral thought rather than moral behavior (Walker 2004)
is it more important to focus on how they would behave in fake dilemmas, or how they actually act in real life
conscious/deliberate vs unconscious/automatic (Haidt 2018)
people have a lot of time to think in these scenarios
some think that this should be based on a gut reaction
gender (Gilligan 1982, 1996)
justice perspective vs care perspective
all Kohlberg’s research was done on teenage boys
Gilligan said boys and girls prioritize different things
boys tend to lend more towards the justice perspective: was someone wronged, do they deserve retribution, how to get a justifiable outcome
girls tend to look via a care perspective: making sure someone is benefitting, connecting with others
girls tended to show lower moral development than boys did
culture and moral reasoning (Helwig, 2013)
other countries score “lower” bc they were not represented in the research
families (Narvaez and Bradshaw, 2023)
didn’t consider the effect of families on moral development
Kohlberg’s only thought peers had a influence
domain theory of moral development
to differentiate between moral vs societal conventions
moral domain
right vs wrong
based on justice
ex. lying, cheating
societal domain (social conventional reasoning)
rules, laws, and social conventions
arbitrary, malleable
ex. not holding the door open for someone
personal domain
individual preference, doesn’t impact anyone else
ex. what clothes to wear
sociometric status - where each child falls in hierarchy
if in the middle, you are average (most children)
popular: good social skills, well liked
neglected: forgotten about by peers
rejected: 2 subgroups are aggressive and withdrawn
controversial: well liked by some, disliked by others