Placement of CapEx in Financial Statements
CapEx is often debated whether it should be placed above or below the line in the income statement.
Common argument for placing CapEx below the Net Operating Income (NOI) line:
It's seen as non-recurring and not necessary for normal operations, not part of Operating Expenses (OPEX).
Ownership Variation:
CapEx needs can vary based on owner intentions (e.g., renovations vs. maintaining as is).
Effect on OPEX Ratios:
Differing ownership decisions can lead to different CapEx treatments, affecting OPEX ratios.
Example:
If one owner maintains a property while another renovates (e.g., adding a pool), their financial outcomes will differ, causing a disparity in operational comparisons.
Inclusion in Operating Expenses:
Supporters argue that CapEx, even if infrequent, is essential to operating the asset, thus should be included in OPEX.
This approach helps provide a more comprehensive view of net operating income.
Impact on Asset Value:
How CapEx is reported can significantly influence asset valuation, particularly in calculations involving cash flow and IRR.
Cap Rate Analysis:
Cap rate changes when CapEx is placed above or below the NOI line.
This discrepancy can result in drastically varied investment returns.
Example:
If an asset is marked at $5 million with a cap rate of 10%, moving CapEx below the line may decrease the perceived value compared to when placed above.
Asset Valuation Calculation Example:
When calculating the cap rate with CapEx treated differently:
Asset price of $5,000,000 with a 10% cap rate results in differing valuations based on CapEx treatment.
Example Calculation:
If treated above the line, cap rate could fall to around 7% and thus lower ultimate property valuation to approximately $5,800,000.
Conversely, if below the line, it could maintain higher valuations.
Clarity on Return Expectations:
Knowing how CapEx is classified affects anticipated returns and valuation comparisons in the market.
Decisions about placement should always consider the asset management strategy and investment criteria.
Definition of Core Factor:
Indicates the amount by which rentable space exceeds usable space due to common area allocations.
Landlords often charge tenants for these additional spaces, which can range from lobbies to shared bathrooms.
Calculating Load Factor:
Calculate by dividing total square footage by usable square footage, which establishes how much space tenants are paying for compared to what they occupy.
Example: A total building size of 6,500 square feet with 5,500 square feet usable space results in a load factor of 1.18, indicating additional square footage charged for common areas.
Tenant Awareness of Rent Structures:
Tenants need to understand how shared space affects their rent and ensure fair calculation with the landlord.
Relating load factors to rent can help negotiate better terms in lease agreements.
Building Owners and Managers Association (BOMA):
Provides standards for measuring building space which affect how landlords can charge for space.
Changes in BOMA measurement standards can lead to increased rentable areas, affecting tenant costs.
The Importance of Clearly Defined Expenses:
Correct classification and understanding of CapEx impact financial assessments and investment decisions.
Both landlords and tenants should stay mindful of how CapEx, load factors, and pro-rata shares are established to ensure balanced agreements and valuations.